Antonio Maria Chiarelli1, Daniele Mascali1, Nikolaos Petsas2, Carlo Pozzilli2, Richard Geoffrey Wise1, and Valentina Tomassini1
1Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti Pescara, Chieti Scalo, Italy, 2Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
Synopsis
The cerebrovascular
system is altered in MS. Using breath-hold BOLD-MRI, we tested
whether pharmacological modulation of MS inflammation influences alteration in
cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). We found that CVR increased with immunomodulation
and this increase was negatively correlated with pre-treatment CVR, suggesting
that cerebrovascular alteration reflects disease activity. Moreover, lower CVR
in the pre-treatment phase was associated with lower grey matter volume and
this correlation was lost with immunomodulation, indicating an involvement of
brain vasculature in neurodegeneration. Given the multiparametric
characteristic of BOLD, further studies are warranted to clarify the vascular
origin of our findings.
Introduction
The cerebrovascular
system is altered in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Whether this is related to MS
tissue damage
and reflects a disease trait remains unexplored. It is plausible that an inability of the cerebrovascular
system to maintain oxygen supply contributes to tissue damage and mediates neurodegeneration
in MS1. MRI-based measurements of cerebrovascular reactivity
(CVR), i.e. the ability of the vasculature to constrict and dilate to regulate
blood flow (CBF), have the potential to
quantify this under-explored aspect of MS2,3.
BOLD signal change per unit of variation in end-tidal partial
pressure of (Pet)CO2 can be used as a metric of CVR with good signal
to noise ratio4. Because BOLD-MRI is sensitive to deoxyhemoglobin
(dHb), during an isometabolic stimulation, the effect of CBF on venous
saturation makes BOLD monotonic with CBF fractional changes, with a
multiplicative coefficient that depends on baseline venous blood volume (CBV) and
deoxy-hemoglobin concentration [dHb]5.
Here, we mapped BOLD-CVR relying on a breath-hold task6 (hypercapnic stimulation) in MS patients and in matched healthy controls
(HC), prior to and during immunomodulation7. Methods
Relapsing-remitting MS patients eligible to start
treatment with interferon beta (IFN-β) and matched HC were scanned using a
Siemens Magnetom-Verio 3T/70 cm bore magnet. Patients were scanned three times,
twice before treatment, and once after 2 months of treatment; HCs were scanned
on one occasion only.
T1-weighted scans (TR/TE = 1900/2.93ms, 512x512
matrix, FOV 260x260 mm, 176 sagittal slices of 1 mm, flip angle 9°) were
acquired for grey matter (GM) volume estimation and for BOLD co-registration. BOLD
images included 92 whole-brain T2*-weighted volumes using 2D gradient
echo-planar-imaging (EPI, TR/TE = 3000/30 ms, 64x64 matrix, FOV 192x192 mm, 50
transverse 3 mm slices, flip angle 90°). During BOLD acquisition, participants performed
5 breath-holds of 16 seconds, interleaved with 34 seconds of recovery6. CO2 was measured in the expired air via a
nasal cannula. T1-weighted images (TR/TE = 550/9.80 ms, 320x320 matrix, FOV
240x240 mm, 25 axial slices of 4 mm, flip angle 9°) were acquired 5 minutes
after gadolinium (Gd) administration to assess the presence/absence of Gd-enhancing
lesions8.
PetCO2 was extracted from CO2
recordings. Structural and functional MRIs were processed using FSL9. CVR maps (expressed in semi-quantitative units of % BOLD/mmHg)
were estimated as regression β-weights between canonical HRF10-convolved PetCO2 and BOLD changes (Figure 1a). Global GM CVRs were
computed as median values of the β-weights within the GM mask whereas statistical
mapping was performed on MNI-warped and smoothed (sigma= 4mm) CVR images. A
trained researcher assessed Gd-enhancing lesions on the post-contrast
T1-weighted images.Results
We tested 23 MS patients and 18 HC. At scan 2 (baseline for treatment), there
were 13 Gd positive scans; at scan 3 (on treatment), the number of active scans
was 3. Figure 1b,c shows a BOLD-CVR map and CVR
distribution within GM. An ANOVA did not reveal significant differences between
MS and HC CVR in GM [F(3,79)=1.71, p=0.17] (Figure 2). Repeated ANOVA identified changes of CVR [F(2,38)=3.29, p=0.04],
with higher post-treatment CVR values, when compared to pre-treatment CVR in GM
(average
of scans 1 and 2), [t(20)=2.43,
p=0.02] (Figure 2). The CVR increase
negatively correlated with pre-treatment CVR in GM, (r=-0.58, p=6.3·10-3)
(Figure 2). A larger CVR increase was
observed in the posterior cingulate and occipital cortices, and in the
cerebellum (Figure 3). In the
patients only, there was a significant correlation between GM CVR and volume (normalized
for intracranial volume) prior to treatment (scan 1, r=0.60 p=3.5·10-3,
and scan 2, r=0.47, p=0.03). This association was lost after treatment (Figure 4).Discussion
We mapped BOLD-CVR4 in HC and in MS patients, before and during IFN-β. An
increase in CVR with IFN-β in GM was found and it was negatively correlated
with pre-treatment CVR, suggesting a restoration of CVR, in which a greater recovery
occurs for larger initial inflammation-mediated vasodilatory impairment. Clusters
of stronger positive changes in CVR were observed in posterior cingulate and occipital
cortices and in the cerebellum. CVR modulation paralleled changes in inflammation,
as assessed Gd-enhancing lesions. A pre-treatment positive association between
CVR and GM volume suggested an involvement of cerebrovascular impairment in MS neurodegeneration.
The interpretation of our findings is not
straightforward. The lack of a significant difference in CVR between HC and MS
at baseline could be due to between-subjects variance in CVR estimates deriving
from the multiparametric origin of BOLD signal5 and from inter-subject variability in the hemodynamic
response function11. It should be noted that longitudinal changes in BOLD
CVR might be related to an increase in baseline CBV rather than to an increase
in fractional CBF with hypercapnia. Such an effect on CBV would be, nonetheless,
interesting in relating inflammation to brain vasculature. Further studies are
needed to elucidate the vascular and metabolic origins of the treatment effect
on MS damage. Conclusion
Our findings lend support to the hypothesis that the cerebrovascular system should be a
main target of investigations in MS utility. Further developments in MRI of brain
physiology will offer
an opportunity to identify alterations and detect changes within this system that
may reveal very valuable in correctly phenotyping patients and in targeting
mechanisms of damage and progression in MS12–15.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially conducted under
the framework of the Departments of Excellence 2018–2022 initiative of the
Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research for the Department of
Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences (DNISC) of the University of
Chieti-Pescara, Italy.References
1. D’haeseleer, M.,
Cambron, M., Vanopdenbosch, L. & De Keyser, J. Vascular aspects of multiple
sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 10, 657–666 (2011).
2. Marshall, O., Chawla,
S., Lu, H., Pape, L. & Ge, Y. Cerebral blood flow modulation insufficiency
in brain networks in multiple sclerosis: A hypercapnia MRI study. J. Cereb.
Blood Flow Metab. 36, 2087–2095 (2016).
3. Marshall, O. et al.
Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 71,
1275 (2014).
4. Heyn, C. et al.
Quantification of Cerebrovascular Reactivity by Blood Oxygen Level–Dependent MR
Imaging and Correlation with Conventional Angiography in Patients with Moyamoya
Disease. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 31, 862–867 (2010).
5. Davis, T. L., Kwong, K.
K., Weisskoff, R. M. & Rosen, B. R. Calibrated functional MRI: Mapping the
dynamics of oxidative metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95,
1834–1839 (1998).
6. Murphy, K., Harris, A.
D. & Wise, R. G. Robustly measuring vascular reactivity differences with
breath-hold: Normalising stimulus-evoked and resting state BOLD fMRI data. NeuroImage
54, 369–379 (2011).
7. Jacobs, L. D. et al.
Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple
sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 39, 285–294 (1996).
8. Kappos, L. et al.
Predictive value of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for relapse
rate and changes in disability or impairment in multiple sclerosis: a
meta-analysis. The Lancet 353, 964–969 (1999).
9. Jenkinson, M., Beckmann,
C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W. & Smith, S. M. FSL. NeuroImage
62, 782–790 (2012).
10. Friston, K. J.
Statistical parametric mapping. in Functional neuroimaging: Technical foundations 79–93 (Academic
Press, 1994).
11. Rangaprakash, D., Wu,
G.-R., Marinazzo, D., Hu, X. & Deshpande, G. Hemodynamic response function
(HRF) variability confounds resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Magn.
Reson. Med. 80, 1697–1713 (2018).
12. Ota, M. et al.
Abnormalities of cerebral blood flow in multiple sclerosis: A pseudocontinuous
arterial spin labeling MRI study. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31,
990–995 (2013).
13. Germuska, M. et al.
Dual-calibrated fMRI measurement of absolute cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen
consumption and effective oxygen diffusivity. NeuroImage 184,
717–728 (2019).
14. Lu, H. et al.
Calibration and validation of TRUST MRI for the estimation of cerebral blood
oxygenation. Magn. Reson. Med. 67, 42–49 (2012).
15. Shmueli, K. et al.
Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn.
Reson. Med. 62, 1510–1522 (2009).