Hyun-Seo Ahn1, Jaeseok Park2, Chul Ho Sohn3, and Sung-Hong Park1
1Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advnaced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 3Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
Measurement
of changes in blood-brain barrier permeability is important for early diagnosis
of brain diseases. In this study, we propose multi-slice multi-delay
diffusion-weighted arterial spin labeling for simultaneous acquisition of
various quantitative perfusion estimates including the water exchange rate and
the permeability surface area product, which are known to be closely related to
BBB permeability, and blood perfusion and arterial blood volume. The water
exchange rate in 4 Alzheimer patients were smaller than that in 6 normal
subjects, opposed to common knowledges on BBB permeability. The proposed
approach may work as a new biomarker for early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease.
Introduction
Blood-brain
barrier (BBB) is a semi-permeable barrier wrapping around the brain micro-vasculatures.
BBB prevents free exchange of solutes between blood and brain tissue. BBB
permeability is an important indicator of the BBB function. Conventionally,
methods using exogenous tracers such as PET or DCE-MRI are preferred for
measuring BBB permeability. However, those methods have either limited access
or potential risk of nephropathy.
Also, common gadolinium-based contrast agents have a large molecular weight, so
cannot be used to measure the subtle changes in BBB. For these reasons, arterial
spin labeling (ASL) methods have been tried to measure the BBB water
permeability noninvasively [1-4].
Diffusion-weighted
ASL (DWASL) acquires two sets of images with and without diffusion-weighting
gradients. DWASL is based on the two compartment model composed of the tissue
and capillary compartments, where water molecules can exchange across the BBB
with a finite exchange rate [1].
While the ASL signals without diffusion gradients are from both capillary and
tissue compartments, the capillary compartment is selectively suppressed using the
diffusion gradients because of its relatively fast movement. However, the
arterial compartment, which is in transit phase to the tissue/capillary
exchange sites, is not considered in the two compartments model.
In
this study, perfusion images with and without diffusion gradients were obtained
using pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) with 2D multi-slice gradient-echo EPI
readout. By permuting the slice acquisition order in each set, dynamic perfusion-weighted
images were acquired at multiple time-points. Four-phase perfusion kinetic
model [5]
was used for analysis, and quantitative perfusion measurements including water
permeability ($$$k_w$$$, PS), cerebral blood flow (CBF), arterial transit time
(ATT), and arterial blood volume (aBV) were quantified and compared in patients
and normal subjects.Methods
Model
Schematic
representation of four-phase perfusion kinetic model is shown in Fig.1. Here
are numerical equations describing perfusion compartments of pCASL at each time
phase.
(1) Transit Phase ($$$t<t_A$$$)$$ΔM(t)=0{\cdots}Eq.(1)$$
Before $$$t_A$$$, no signal
contributes to the $$$ΔM$$$.
(2) Arterial Phase ($$${t_A}<t<t_{ex}+{t_A}$$$)$$ΔM(t)=Δ{M_a}(t)={{2α{M_0}{\cdot}CBF}\over{λ}}\cdot{T_{1a}}[{e}^{-R_{1a}max(t-τ,{t_A})}-{e}^{-{R_{1a}t}}]{\cdots}Eq.(2)$$
Arterial
phase is the time for labeled water to reach the water exchange region. It was
assumed that water exchange does not occur until the labeled blood enters the capillary
bed.
(3) Arterial-Capillary Transitional Phase ($$$t_{ex}+{t_A}<t$$$)$$Δ{M_a}(t)={{2α{M_0}{\cdot}CBF}\over{λ}}\cdot{T_{1a}}[{e}^{-R_{1a}max(t-τ,{t_A})}-{e}^{-{R_{1a}T_{ex}}}]{\cdots}Eq.(3)$$$$Δ{M_c}(t)={{2α{M_0}{\cdot}CBF}\over{λ}}\cdot{{e^{-(R_{1a}+k_w)max(T_{ex},t-τ)}-e^{-(R_{1a}+k_w)t}}\over{R_{1a}+k_w}}{\cdots}Eq.(4)$$$$Δ{M_t}(t)={{2α{M_0}{\cdot}CBF}\over{λ}}\cdot{k_we^{-R_{1b}t}\over{R_{1a}+k_w-R_{1b}}}[e^{(-R_{1a}-k_w+R_{1b})max(T_{ex},t-τ)}-e^{(-R_{1a}+k_w)t}]{\cdots}Eq.(5)$$
Water
exchange between capillary and tissue compartments occurs when labeled water
enters the capillary bed. Based on the fact that the tissue blood volume is
much larger than capillary, no re-entering of water from the tissue to the capillary
compartment was assumed.
(4) Capillary Phase
After
all the labeled water has entered the capillary bed for exchange, signals from
tissue/capillary compartments contribute to the perfusion signal. The mean
transit time of blood in the capillary bed is known to be large enough for the inverted
longitudinal magnetization to be fully relaxed, so outflow into the vein was not
considered.
Data Acquisition
The
sequence diagram and the proposed permuting slice acquisition order is shown in
Fig. 2. Eight slices were obtained in 4 sets by permuting their acquisition
order in each set, which was repeated for acquisition of 8 control/label pairs.
The scan was repeated twice with and without diffusion gradients (b=50 s/mm2).
For the CBF quantification, $$$M_0$$$ was obtained in ascending order. Total
scan time was 11min.
Normal
subjects (24.2±1.8Y, N=6, 3F) and patients with
Alzheimer disease (75.5±4.2Y,
N=4, 3F) were examined on
a 3T MRI scanner (Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).
Analysis
$$$t_A$$$ and $$$T_{ex}$$$
were calculated by fitting acquired dynamic images of b=0 and 50 s/mm2 to
Eq.(6), respectively. $$$T_{ex}$$$ in pixels with $$$<t_A$$$ were assumed to
be $$$<t_A$$$. Using calculated arrival times, images were analyzed using
Eq.(1)-(5). Bi-exponential model[1] was adopted to analyze the diffusion-weighted ASL images. Diffusion
weighting with b=50 s/mm2 was
assumed to be sufficient to suppress the perfusion signal in the arterial and
capillary compartments[1]. Finally, $$$k_w$$$ was estimated pixel-by-pixel based on least square
errors in Eq.(6)[10].
$${{ΔM_{b50}(t)}\over{ΔM_{b0}(t)}}={{ΔM_t{(t,k_w)}}\over{ΔM_a(t)+ΔM_c(t,k_w)+ΔM_t(t,k_w)}}{\cdots}Eq.(7)$$
aBV
and PS were obtained through the equations in Table.1. Gaussian filters with FWHM
of 3mm, 5mm, and 10mm were applied to the acquired images, CBF&ATT maps,
and $$$k_w$$$ maps, respectively. For statistical analysis, the Wilcoxon signed
rank test was used to compare quantitative perfusion measurements of patients with
those of normal subjects.Results and Discussion
In addition to $$$k_w$$$, PS could
be quantified through aBV in this study, which has been difficult in the
previous DWASL studies. In general, quantitative perfusion maps (CBF, ATT, $$$k_w$$$,
aBV, and PS) were successfully estimated, but edges were erroneous in CBF, aBV,
and PS (Fig.3). No significant differences in CBF, ATT, aBV and PS were
observed between patients and normal subjects (Fig.4). Only $$$k_w$$$ was significantly
lower in patients, opposed to the common knowledge that it increases with aging
and diseases [6, 7]. aBV values were smaller than previous studies [8, 9], however by excluding the voxels with $$$T_{ex}<t_A$$$, the estimate
became comparable.Conclusion
We
demonstrated that the proposed multi-slice multi-delay DWASL enables us to quantify
perfusion measures including CBF, ATT, $$$k_w$$$, aBV, and PS. Further ROI
analysis and clinical interpretation of acquired maps will be necessary to
verify validity and clinical utility of the proposed method for detection of
BBB dysfunction.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] St. Lawrence, K.S., D. Owen, and D.J.
Wang, A two‐stage approach
for measuring vascular water exchange and arterial transit time by diffusion‐weighted
perfusion MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,
2012. 67(5): p. 1275-1284.
[2] Lin, Z., et al., Non‐contrast MR imaging of blood‐brain barrier
permeability to water. Magnetic resonance in
medicine, 2018.
[3] Hales, P.W. and C.A.
Clark, Combined arterial spin labeling
and diffusion-weighted imaging for noninvasive estimation of capillary volume
fraction and permeability-surface product in the human brain. Journal of
Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2013. 33(1): p. 67-75.
[4] Gregori, J., et al., T2‐based arterial spin labeling
measurements of blood to tissue water transfer in human brain. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2013. 37(2): p. 332-342.
[5] Li, K.l., et al., Four‐phase single‐capillary
stepwise model for kinetics in arterial spin labeling MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005. 53(3): p. 511-518.
[6] Montagne, A., et al.,
Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the
aging human hippocampus. Neuron, 2015. 85(2):
p. 296-302.
[7] Farrall, A.J. and
J.M. Wardlaw, Blood–brain barrier: ageing
and microvascular disease–systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiology
of aging, 2009. 30(3): p. 337-352.
[8] Liu, P., J. Uh, and
H. Lu, Determination of spin compartment
in arterial spin labeling MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011. 65(1): p. 120-127.
[9] Petersen, E.T., T.
Lim, and X. Golay, Model‐free arterial
spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006. 55(2): p. 219-232.