Mingxiao Wang1, AIlian Liu1, Yuhui Liu1, Anliang Chen1, wan Dong1, Xinao Wang1, Qingwei Song1, Xinru Zhang1, Liangjie Lin2, and Jiazheng Wang2
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, Dalian, China, 2Philips Healthcare,Beijing,China, Beijing, China
Synopsis
The purpose of this study was to evaluate
the value of amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging in the
identification of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Results showed that,
for patients with rectal cancer, the APTw value in group with lymph node
metastasis was significantly lower than those in group without lymph node
metastasis. APTw imaging can be used as a promising non-invasive method to
predict the lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.
Synopsis
The purpose of this study was to evaluate
the value of amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging in the
identification of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Results showed that,
for patients with rectal cancer, the APTw value in group with lymph node
metastasis was significantly lower than those in group without lymph node
metastasis. APTw imaging can be used as a promising non-invasive method to
predict the lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.(AUC:0.770;sensitivity :70% specificity :80% )Introduction
Rectal cancer is one of the most common
malignant tumors in the digestive tract. Whether there is lymph node metastasis
in patients with rectal cancer has an important impact on the decision-making
of treatment plan and the prognosis of patients. Therefore, the accurate
determination of lymph node metastasis is an important step in the treatment of
rectal cancer. In this study, the amide-proton-transfer weighted (APTw) imaging
on the primary foci of rectal cancer was evaluated for prediction of lymph node
metastasis.[1-3]Materials and Methods
This study has been approved by the local
IRB. A total of 20 cases with informed consent were scanned for a retrospective
study from March 2019 to December 2020.10 patients with lymph node metastasis (group
A,7males,3 females) and 10 patients without lymph node metastasis (group B 7males,3 females )were
enrolled(age range from 28 to 77 years 62.1±11.3). All
patients underwent 3D APTw imaging and routine MR examinations on a 3.0T MR
scanner (Ingenia CX, Philips Healthcare). APTw imaging was performed using a
saturation pulse with duration of 2s and strength of 2μT. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on the
image of rectal cancer. All ROIs were placed within the interested tissue by
avoiding blood vessels. A ROI was manually placed by two radiologists (8years and 2years
of clinical experience) on the same location of the lesion according to the APTw
image, and its APT value was measured (Fig.1). The ICC (Inter-class correlation
coefficient) was used to test the measurement consistency between the two
observers. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the difference of APT value
between group A and group B. If there is a significant difference, the
diagnostic efficiency would be test by the ROC curve analysis.Results
APT values measured by the two doctors were
well consistent (ICC > 0.75). The APT values measured for the primary foci
of the rectal cancer in group A (1.75[1.67, 2.75]%) were significantly lower than those in group B (2.20[1.87, 3.50]%) (Fig. 2).
The area under the ROC curve of APT value to distinguish the lesions of group A
and B was 0.770, and the diagnostic sensitivity and
specificity were 70% and 80% . (Fig. 3).Discussion and Conclusion
The APT values of rectal cancer with lymph
node metastasis were significantly lower than those of rectal cancer without
lymph node metastasis. Therefore, APTw imaging can be sensitive in prediction
of the lymphatic metastasis in rectal cancer.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.
References
[1] Zhou Jinyuan, HeoHye-Young, Knutsson Linda, et al. APT-weighted
MRI: Techniques, current neuro applications, andchallenging issues.Magn Reson
Imaging, 2019, 50: 347-364.
[2] Takayama Y, Nishie A, Sugimoto
M, et al. Amide proton transfer (APT) magnetic
resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison with Gleason scores. MAGMA
2016; 29: 671-679.87.
[3] Zhou J, Payen JF, Wilson DA, et
al. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular
proteins to detect PH effects in MRI[J]. Nat Med, 2003,9:1085-1090.