Seohee So1, Byungjai Kim1, HyunWook Park1, and Berkin Bilgic2
1Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of, 2Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
Synopsis
An
MR parameter estimation method using spin- and stimulated-echo signals is proposed.
Three-90° pulse sequence is introduced to simultaneously acquire spin and
stimulated echo signals. These signals contain rich information that allow for
estimation of T1, T2, M0, B0 and B1 maps. We utilize Blip Up-Down Acquisition (BUDA) to eliminate geometric
distortion incurred by rapid EPI readout. In order to estimate the parameter
maps from the spin- and stimulated-echo signals with high fidelity, two
parameter estimation methods, analytic fitting and a novel unsupervised deep
neural network method, are developed.
Introduction
MR
parameter quantification enables advanced characterization of tissue and facilitates
longitudinal studies1-4. However, MR parameter estimation techniques
typically require excessive acquisition time, hence they often do not lend
themselves to routine clinical application. Herein, we propose a rapid
parameter estimation technique that provides distortion-free and co-registered
T1, T2, M0, B0 and B0
maps. Method
Acquisition & Reconstruction
The
proposed mapping of T1, T2, M0 and B1
inhomogeneity is based on simultaneously acquired spin- and stimulated-echo signals
from three-90° RF pulse sequence5,6. Figure 1(a) shows the proposed
pulse sequence, where EPI technique is used for rapidly encoding spin- and
stimulated-echo contrasts. The acquired echo signals are formulated as follows:
$$S_{SE}=M_{0}\cdot(1-e^{-TR_{eff}^{prev}/T_{1}})\cdot sin(B_{1}\cdot \frac{\pi}{2})\cdot sin^{2}(B_{1}\cdot \frac{\pi}{4})\cdot e^{-TE/T_{2}}~~~~~[1]$$
$$S_{STE}=\frac{1}{2}\cdot M_{0}\cdot(1-e^{-TR_{eff}^{prev}/T_{1}})\cdot sin^{3}(B_{1}\cdot \frac{\pi}{2})\cdot e^{-TM/T_{1}}\cdot e^{-TE/T_{2}}~~~~~[2]$$
where
TE is the echo time, TM is the mixing time, and $$$TR_{eff}^{prev}=TR^{prev}-\frac{TE^{prev}}{2}-TM^{prev}$$$ is the effective TR of the previous acquisition.
In
order to eliminate the geometric distortion in the EPI readout, we introduce
blip-up/down acquisition (BUDA) and reconstruction7. BUDA acquires two
shots of EPI with opposite phase encoding directions. With this set of opposite-polarity
images, B0 field map can be estimated8. BUDA
reconstruction incorporates the estimated field inhomogeneity into parallel
imaging forward model and employs Hankel structured low-rank constraint9-11
to exploits similarities between the opposite-polarity images while mitigating
potential shot-to-shot phase variation as follows:
$$\min_{I}\sum_{t=1(blip-up)}^{2(blip-down)}‖F_{t}ECI_{t}-k_{t} ‖_{2}^{2}+\lambda‖\mathcal{H}(I)‖_{*}~~~~~[3]$$
where $$$F_{t}$$$ is Fourier operator in $$$t^{th}$$$ shot, $$$E$$$ is field inhomogeneity map, $$$C$$$ is coil sensitivities estimated from
distortion-free gradient-echo calibration data using ESPIRiT12, $$$𝑘_{𝑡}$$$ is k-space data for $$$t^{th}$$$ shot, $$$\mathcal{H}(\cdot)$$$ is the block-Hankel
representation and $$$𝐼$$$
is the distortion-free image.
While
using a larger TM provides T1 sensitivity, this increases the dead
time between the second and the third RF pulses and reduces the acquisition efficiency.
We incorporate an echo-shifting approach6 to ensure high sampling
efficiency, where the mixing time is used for acquiring spin echo data from
different slice locations as shown in Figure 1(c).
Parameter estimation
We
introduce two methods for estimating T1, T2, M0
and B1. First approach is an analytic method with dictionary
matching and nonlinear least square fitting, whereas the second approach uses
unsupervised neural network-based optimization.
Analytic
fitting: We take the signal ratio between stimulated
and spin echoes to eliminate T2 decay effect and spin density
component.
$$\frac{S_{STE}}{S_{SE}}=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\left\{\frac{sin(B_{1}\cdot \frac{\pi}{2})}{sin(B_{1}\cdot \frac{\pi}{4})}\right\}^{2}\cdot e^{-TM/T_{1}}~~~~~[4]$$
The
ratio follows simple exponential decay with respect to TM. T1 and B1
are estimated from these ratio images. Rapid initial estimates for T1
and B1 are first obtained by Bloch-simulated dictionary matching and
the values are used as seed point for subsequent nonlinear least-square
fitting. The estimated T1 and B1 values are plugged in
the spin echo signal equation, which now only contains T2 and M0
components and follows simple exponential decay with respect to TE. T2
and M0 are estimated by nonlinear least-square fitting after an
interim dictionary matching. With the prior knowledge that B1 field
is spatially smooth, B1 is estimated by polynomial fitting and T1
is re-estimated using the estimated B1 to improve estimation
performance.
Unsupervised
deep neural network for parameter estimation: In order to exploit
spatial relations between neighboring voxels, we propose a convolutional neural
network-based parameter quantification method. Input of the quantification
network is a set of spin- and stimulated-echo images for various TE and TM. The
quantification network produces T1, T2, M0
maps as output. A residual network is used as the quantification network. Starting
from these output T1, T2, M0 maps and the
polynomial fitted B1, spin- and stimulated-echo signals are
synthesized by Bloch generator as Eqs [1-2]. The signal difference between the
input images and the synthesized images is utilized as loss function, thereby
obviating the need for any additional ground truth information during the
estimation of network weights.
$$Loss=|SE-SE_{syn}|+\lambda|STE-STE_{syn}|~~~~~[5]$$
$$$\lambda$$$ is the regularizing
parameter for compensating signal intensity difference between spin echo and
stimulated echo signals.Result
Phantom
experiments and in vivo MRI experiments were conducted on 3T MRI scanner
(Siemens Magnetom Verio) to validate the proposed method. The proposed
simultaneous spin echo and stimulated echo acquisition was performed with five combinations
of TE and TM.
Parameter
estimation results of phantom experiments with the proposed method and
reference methods are shown in Figure 3 and those of in vivo brain experiments
are shown in Figure 4 and 5. As shown in the parameter estimation results, geometric
distortion are corrected by the proposed BUDA-STEAM. In terms of T1
and T2 values, the proposed and reference methods show similar
results even though the proposed method took shorter time for acquisition,
total 25sec for the phantom experiment and 50sec for the in vivo experiment. The
estimated results with the analytic fitting and the neural network-based
estimation are similar for all parameters of T1, T2, B1,
and M0. The neural network-based estimation provides noise-robust MR
parameters owing to the fact that the convolutional network takes information of
spatially adjacent voxels into account.Discussion & Conclusion
The
proposed BUDA-STEAM parameter estimation method enables acquisition of
distortion-corrected, co-registered T1, T2, M0,
B1 and B0 maps, within a short acquisition time using a
three-90° pulse sequence and BUDA reconstruction. In addition, the parameter
estimation using unsupervised neural network optimization provided noise-robust
results from this rapid acquisition.Acknowledgements
This
research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D
Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded
by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number :
HI14C1135) and MIT-Korea - KAIST Seed Fund of MIT International Science and
Technology Initiatives (MISTI).References
[1] Tofts, Paul, ed. Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes
caused by disease. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
[2] Neema, Mohit, et al. "T1‐and T2‐based MRI measures of diffuse
gray matter and white matter damage in patients with multiple sclerosis." Journal of Neuroimaging 17 (2007):
16S-21S.
[3] Bohnen, Sebastian, et al. "Performance of t1 and t2 mapping
cardiovascular magnetic resonance to detect active myocarditis in patients with
recent-onset heart failure." Circulation:
Cardiovascular Imaging 8.6 (2015): e003073.
[4] Foltz, Warren D., et al. "Changes in apparent diffusion
coefficient and T2 relaxation during radiotherapy for prostate cancer." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
37.4 (2013): 909-916.
[5] Shi, Xianfeng, Seong‐Eun Kim, and
Eun‐Kee Jeong. "Single‐shot T1 mapping using simultaneous acquisitions of
spin‐and stimulated‐echo‐planar imaging (2D ss‐SESTEPI)." Magnetic
resonance in medicine 64.3 (2010): 734-742.
[6] Fritz, Francisco J., Benedikt A. Poser,
and Alard Roebroeck. "MESMERISED: Super-accelerated 7 T STEAM imaging for
quantitative multi-contrast and diffusion MRI." bioRxiv (2020).
[7] Liao, Congyu, et al. "Highly
efficient MRI through multi-shot echo planar imaging." Wavelets
and Sparsity XVIII. Vol. 11138. International Society for Optics and
Photonics, 2019.
[8] Andersson, Jesper LR, Stefan Skare, and
John Ashburner. "How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo
echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging." Neuroimage 20.2
(2003): 870-888.
[9] Haldar, Justin P. "Low-rank modeling of local
k-space neighborhoods (LORAKS) for constrained MRI." IEEE
transactions on medical imaging 33.3 (2013): 668-681.
[10] Lee, Dongwook, et al. "Acceleration of MR parameter
mapping using annihilating filter‐based low rank hankel matrix
(ALOHA)." Magnetic resonance in medicine 76.6 (2016):
1848-1864.
[11] Mani, Merry, et al. "Multi‐shot sensitivity‐encoded
diffusion data recovery using structured low‐rank matrix completion
(MUSSELS)." Magnetic resonance in medicine 78.2 (2017):
494-507.
[12] Uecker, Martin, et al. "ESPIRiT—an eigenvalue
approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA." Magnetic
resonance in medicine 71.3 (2014): 990-1001.