Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens*1, Jonas Kielmann*1, and N. Jon Shah1,2,3,4
1INM-4, Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany, 2Faculty of Medicine, JARA, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 3INM-11, JARA, Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany, 4Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Synopsis
Quantitative MRI parameters are determined by the
properties of tissue on a microscopic scale and can be expected to reflect microstructural
changes created by aging. Here,
we investigate a multiparametric qMRI signature of healthy ageing on 26 healthy
volunteers, characterised in a high-dimensional parametric space (water
content, relaxometry, qMT). Changes with age in the mean values and
correlations between parameters are observed and interpreted.
Introduction
The
proportion of the world’s population aged 60 or more is predicted to double by
2055 compared to the year 2000 [1]. This change in demographics naturally
generates huge interest in understanding healthy and pathological brain aging.
MRI plays a
major role in characterizing these changes in vivo. In addition to providing
measures of macroscopic morphological changes, MRI delivers quantitative
parameters which are determined by the properties of tissue on a microscopic
(~10um) scale [2]. Microstructural signatures of changes in aging brain tissue
can thus be provided in vivo by quantitative MRI [3,4,5]. Here, we investigate a
multiparametric qMRI signature of healthy ageing on 26 healthy volunteers,
characterised in a high-dimensional parametric space: water content (H2O); R1
and R2* relaxometry; qMT parameters fbound, kex and MTR; QSM; cortical
thickness and local gyrification index, as well as coefficients characterizing
linear dependencies between pairs of parameters.Materials and methods
A quantitative
MRI protocol was measured from a subset of ~150 volunteers among those included
in the population-based cohort study 1000BRAINS [6], conducted on a 3T Tim-Trio scanner.
Data on twenty-six volunteers covering 7 decades
of age as uniformly as possible (between 27 and 80 yo, mean age 53±16 years, male/female 19/7) and
believed to represent healthy aging were selected for analysis. Exclusion criteria
were pathological structure changes visible on MPRAGE or FLAIR (except
age-related changes), known medication intake, a reported history of diseases
affecting the central nervous system, hypertension and diabetes. Details of the
acquisition have been reported in [7,8] on different sub-collectives selected
from the 1000BRAINS cohort. Briefly,
quantitative mapping is based on four 3D multiple-echo (18 echoes) gradient
echo scans, TR=50ms, flip angles of 7deg and 40deg, each with and without
MT preparation, complemented
by flip angle mapping using AFI [9]. Whole-brain coverage with 1x1x2mm3
resolution is achieved in less than 20 minutes. Each pair of scans with 7 and
40deg flip angle (one with, one without MT) provides input for M0, R1 and R2*
mapping (with and w/o MT) as described in [10]. Under the assumption of
complete saturation of the bound proton pool and negligible direct saturation
to the mobile water pool, quantitative MT parameters can be derived [2]: bound
proton fraction (fbound), magnetization exchange rate (kex), and M0 reduction
caused by the MT pulse (MTR). Phase information from each 3D multi-echo scan
provides input for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM).
The MPRAGE anatomical scan
included in the 1000Brains
imaging
protocol [4] was used for
brain parcellation according to the
Destrieux atlas using Freesurfer [11]. The information was transferred to the space of the quantitative
maps using ANTs registration. Mean values of the
quantitative parameters were calculated for each ROI. Correlations between pairs of parameters were
described within each ROI by a linear model ([P1] = beta0(P1) + beta1(P1,P2)[P2]) and the Pearson correlation
coefficient. For the combination of parameters QSM, R1 and R2*, an extended
linear model was tested [QSM] = beta0 + beta1[R1] + beta2[R2*], reflecting the interplay of
myelin and iron in determining QSM and R2* [12], while myelin is the main
determinant of R1 [Koenig]. The alteration of each calculated parameter with
age was assessed using a similar linear regression approach and partial Pearson
correlation including the subjects’ sex as covariate: [qMRI] = beta0 + beta1[age] + beta2[sex].
Freesurfer-calculated
cortical thickness (CT) and ROI volumes normalized by the total intracranial
volume (TIV) were included in the analysis. The statistical analysis was done
in Python (statsmodels and Pingouin packages). Outlier exclusion was performed
using a density-based clustering approach (DBSCAN) as implemented in
scikit-learn. In order
to investigate WM-related changes in more detail, the quantitative maps from
all subjects were nonlinearly registered to the MNI template.Results
The results are summarized in
Figs. 1-3, describing correlations between quantitative parameters (R1 and
(1-H2O) are chosen as example), as well as the effect of aging on the mean
values and correlations between parameters (exemplary results chosen).Discussion and Conclusions
Given the complexity of the
information, we can address here only a few parameters and ROIs. Between pairs
of parameters, R1 and fbound showed the highest correlations. Indeed, the bound
protons which exchange magnetization with mobile water (fbound) are also those
influencing the observed relaxation rate. 1-H2O and fbound and 1-H2O and R1 were
also well correlated, showing that a significant fraction of macromolecules
contribute to MT and relaxation effects.
We discuss in more detail the
changes in the inferior parietal lobule (arrows in Fig4). Decreasing d(1-H2O)/d(fbound)
means that less macromolecules contribute to MT. These are most probably
intracellular macromolecules, which contribute more to MT. Consequently, R1
decreases, as observed, because its sources of relaxation disappear. QSM
decreases, which could be because iron (also previously intracellular) is
transported out of this region. Myelin transport out of the region, as well as
myelin fragmentation are expected to _increase_ susceptibility (the latter
found e.g. in MS lesions, [16]).
The source of the qMRI changes
detected in the inferior parietal lobule appears to be neuronal loss and
transport of iron and macromolecules from the region.
In conclusion, quantitative
parameters appear to reflect several aspects of tissue microscopy and changes with
age, indicating high potential for insight into aging mechanisms.Acknowledgements
AMO-P and NJS acknowledge support by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 764513. Support from Mr. Ricardo Loucao, Dr. Elene Iordanishvili and Dr Melissa Schall in the early stages of this work is gratefully acknowledged.References
[1] World Health Organization. Multisectoral action for a
life course approach to healthy ageing: draft global strategy and plan of
action on ageing and health. 69th World Health Assembly, Geneva, 2016 April 22
(A69/17). Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/A69_17-en.pdf.
[2] P. Tofts, Ed., Quantitative MRI of the
brain: measuring changes caused by disease. Chichester, West Sussex ; Hoboken,
NJ: Wiley, 2003
[3] Callaghan, M. F. et al. Widespread age-related differences in the
human brain microstructure revealed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.
Neurobiol. Aging 35, 1862–1872 (2014).
[4] Seiler, Alexander et al. “Cortical aging -
new insights with multiparametric quantitative MRI.” Aging vol. 12,16 (2020):
16195-16210. doi:10.18632/aging.103629
[5] Filo, S., Shtangel, O., Salamon,
N. et al. Disentangling molecular alterations from water-content changes in the
aging human brain using quantitative MRI. Nat Commun 10, 3403 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11319-1
[6] Caspers S, Moebus S, Lux S, Pundt N, Schutz
H, Muhleisen TW, Amunts K (2014) Studying variability in human brain aging in a
population-based German cohort-rationale and design of 1000BRAINS. Front Aging
Neurosci 6:149
[7] Schall, Melissa et al. 2020 Increasing body
mass index in an elderly cohort: Effects on the quantitative MR parameters of
the brain. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 51:514–523.
[8] Iordanishvili E, Schall M, Loução R,
Zimmermann M, Kotetishvili K, Shah NJ, Oros-Peusquens AM. Quantitative MRI of
cerebral white matter hyperintensities: A new approach towards understanding
the underlying pathology. Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116077.
[9] V.
Yarnykh Magn Reson Med. 2007 Jan;57(1):192-200.
[10] Schall, Melissa et al. 2018 “A 3D two-point method for whole-brain
water content and relaxation time mapping: Comparison with gold standard
methods.” PloS one vol. 13,8 e0201013.
[11]
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/, Freesurfer version 6.0.0
[12] Hametner et al 2018. Neuroimage.
2018;179:117-133.
[13] S. Koenig, MagnResonMed 1990,
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910200210
[14] Fatouros et al 1991, Magn ResonMed 1991, Feb;17(2):402-13.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910170212.
[15] H. Neeb, K. Zilles, N.J. Shah 2006. NeuroImage 29(3):910-22. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.062
[16] K. Deh et al. J Magn Reson
Imaging. 2018;48(5):1281-1287. doi:10.1002/jmri.25997