Xin Li1, Di Tian1, Qingwei Song1, Ailian Liu1, and Zhiyong Li1
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, Dalian, China
Synopsis
In comparison with the traditional whole-heart
coronary magnetic resonance angiography (WH-CMRA) based on the spectral pre-saturation with inversion recovery (SPIR), the advanced WH-CMRA based on Dixon with non-contrast-enhanced
free respiratory navigation is associated with advantages of improved image
quality, increased blood signal-to-noise ratio, and the extra fat image. This study proved that it is feasible to visualize the coronary artery
(image quality scores met the requirement of clinical diagnosis) using the
Dixon based WH-CMRA without increasing scan time.
Main findings
This study proved that it is feasible to visualize the coronary
artery using the Dixon based whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance
angiography.Introduction
Previous studies have shown that, in comparison
with the traditional spectral pre-saturation
with inversion recovery (SPIR), the whole-heart coronary magnetic
resonance angiography (WH-CMRA) based on the Dixon sequence can provide improved
image quality, increased blood signal-to-noise ratio at 1.5 T [1]
and 3 T [2], and an extra fat image with more diagnostic
information [3-4]. This study aims to explore
the feasibility of the Dixon-based WH-CMRA for coronary artery visualization in
patients with chest discomfort but no exact history of coronary heart disease.Materials and methods
This study has been approved by the local
IRB. 21
patients (12 males, age 44-82 years) were
recruited and underwent the WH-CMRA scan on a 3.0 T MR scanner (Ingenia CX, Philips
Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) with free breathing diaphragm navigation.
Before scan of the Dixon sequence, the phase imaging was repeatedly performed
by 100 times to observe the movement track of the right coronary artery on the
axial image, and thus to modified the individualized setting of trigger delay
(TD) and the relatively stationary duration. Scanning parameters of Dixon
included: TR/TE = 4/0 ms, flip angle = 10°, FOV = 301×301 mm2, matrix size = 200×201, spatial resolution = 1.5×1.7 mm2, slice thickness = 1.5 mm, and
slice gap = 0.8 mm. Standard cardiac volume shim was used, and the size of gating
window was 4 mm.
All
images were reconstructed using the platform of Intelli Space Portal (Philips
Healthcare). Coronary arteries were divided into 4 branches [5]
including right coronary artery (RCA), left main coronary artery (LM), left
anterior descending artery (LAD) and left coronary circumflex artery (LCX). The
4 branches were further divided into 9 segments including the RCA proximal, mid
and distal segments (RCA1, RCA2, RCA3), LAD proximal, mid and distal segments
(LAD1, LAD2, LAD3), LCX proximal and distal segments (LCX1, LCX2), and the LM
segment. Two radiologists
scored the image quality with the following criteria: 1 points: coronary artery is severely obscure or
barely visible; 2 points: coronary artery can be observed with moderately
obscure boundary; 3 points: coronary artery can be observed with slightly
obscure boundary; 4 points: coronary arteries can be observed with clear
vascular boundary (Figure 1).
Kappa
test was used for consistency of image quality scores by given by the two
observers. Spearman correlation analysis was used to observe the correlation
between coronary artery image quality score and heart rate of each segment. P
< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results
The average scan
time of 21 subjects was 5.21±0.96min, resulting in a total of 84 coronary arteries and 189
segments. Image quality scores given by the observers were in good agreement (Kappa=0.753).
The number of coronary segments with image quality scores of 4, 3, 2 and 1 were
59 (31.22%), 76 (40.21%), 30 (15.87%), and 24 (12.70%), respectively (Table 1).
A total of 165 (87.30%) coronary segments met the diagnostic requirements (≥2 points).
Heart
rate showed significant negative correlations to the image quality scores for RCA3, LM, and LAD2 (r=-0.452,P=0.040;r=-0.668,P=0.001;and r=-0489,P=0.024, respectively)
rather
than to those of other segments (Table 2).Conclusion
The Dixon sequence does not increase the scan time in comparison
with PSIR. Results indicated that most of the measurements by the Dixon based
WH-CMRA met the requirements of clinical diagnosis. Therefore, it is feasible to visualize coronary artery using the non-contrast-enhanced free
respiratory navigation Dixon-based WH-CMRA. Significant
correlations of the heart rate to the image quality scores indicate that
visualizations of the right coronary artery and the left proximal coronary artery are
associated with better stability.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgementReferences
[1]
Börnert P, Koken P, Nehrke K,
et al. Water/fat-resolved whole-heart Dixon coronary MRA: an initial
comparison. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:156-163.
[2] Nezafat M, Henningsson M, Ripley DP et al. Coronary
MR angiography at 3T: fat suppression versus water-fat separation.MAGMA.
2016;29:733-738.
[3] Ma J, Dixon techniques for water and fat
imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:543-558.
[4] Kellman P, Hernando D, Shah S, et al. Multiecho dixon fat and water
separation method for detecting fibrofatty infiltration in the myocardium. Magn
Reson Med. 2009;61:215-221.
[5] Austen WG, Edwards
JE, Frye RL et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated
for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of
Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart
Association. Circulation. 1975;51:5-40.