Yujin Jung1, Jaeseok Park2, Seong-Gi Kim2, and Sung-Hong Park1
1Department of Bio and Brain engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of, 2Department of Global Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
CEST is a useful method to diagnose
tumor or stroke, but lacks physical information such as compartments with
different diffusivities. In this study, we developed a new diffusion-weighted
steady-state CEST sequence using 3D EPI at 7T. The technique was tested in
phantom and human brain, and the preliminary CEST-weighted apparent diffusion
coefficient maps provided both CEST and diffusion information. Further study is
required to clearly understand the signal source and the potential as a new
biomarker.
Introduction
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a
molecular imaging technique proven to be useful for diagnosis of tumor or
stroke. It has high sensitivity, but lacks physical information such as
compartments with different diffusivity. In this study, we propose a new
diffusion-weighted CEST technique at 7T to obtain a map that contains both CEST
and diffusion information (Fig.1). We expect this could provide us with more
information on proton exchange between freely moving proteins and free water in
different physical compartments. The preliminary phantom and in vivo results
show CEST-weighted apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for the first time to our knowledge.Methods
(Pulse sequence) The
whole-brain 3D steady-state diffusion-weighted CEST MRI was used with a
fat-suppressed excitation pulse, bipolar diffusion gradients in three
orthogonal directions and rapid 3D multi-shot EPI imaging (Fig.2).1
(Data Acquisition) All experiments were performed on a 7T MRI (Magnetom, Siemens,
Erlangen) with a 32-ch head coil. The data were
acquired on a phantom containing agarose and five tubes with amides and
creatine in different concentrations (Fig.3a) and on one human subject. APT
images were acquired at six frequency offsets of ±3, ±3.5, and ±4ppm with 11 b-values of 0, 5, ... 45, 50 s/mm2.2 Acquisition
parameters for the phantom are TR/TE = 95/33ms , flip angle = 18º , matrix size =
128x128 , filed of
view = 230x230mm2,
slice thickness = 5mm, number of slices = 22 , CEST RF = 0.6uT, EPI segments =
4, diffusion gradient duration (δ) = 8.15ms , diffusion gradients = 0-40mT/m in
three orthogonal directions, and number of averages = 2. In vivo imaging
parameters involve less number of b-values (0, 10, 25 and 50) and the diffusion gradients
were applied on readout direction only.
(CEST Processing) B0 correction was performed using WASSR technique.3 MTR
asymmetry was used to calculate CEST signals.
(Statistical Diffusion Analysis) The conventional ADC method was not applied due to intrinsically low CEST signal with diffusion. Rather diffusion
coefficients were estimated using a linear regression method, under the assumption that the CEST
signal exponentially decreases as b-value increases. The acquired data were log scaled and
plotted as regressors where the b-value was the independent variable (eq(2)).
The corresponding slope was inversed in sign to obtain ADC values (eq(2) & (3)). Both water and CEST-weighted diffusion
coefficients were calculated using the linear regression results to validate
the method based on the following equations.
\[S_{b}=S_{0}e^{-bD} \cdot\cdot\cdot\ Eq. (1)\]
\[lnS_{b}=lnS_{0}{-bD} \cdot\cdot\cdot\ Eq. (2)\]
\[Y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1}X \cdot\cdot\cdot\ Eq. (3)\]
where
Sb= signal at a specific b-value, S0= signal at b-value=0, D = diffusion coefficient,
Y = dependent variable of linear regression, X = independent variable, β0 = intercept and β1 = slope.Results
(Phantom) The MTR asymmetry map at 3.5ppm demonstrated the amide
proton transfer (APT) CEST signals, which were proportional to the concentration of
amides (Fig.3b).
In contrast to the homogeneous diffusion coefficients of free water across the
phantom (Fig.3c),
APT-weighted ADC was higher in tubes with higher
amide concentration. Agarose has CEST values close to zero and could be considered
as noise in this map (Fig.3d), due to its high p-value and variance and
low R2 compared to those of tube A. Moreover,
linear regression was done across voxels in a region of interest in tube A (Fig.4).
The slope was negative since the water exponentially decays as b-value
increased. The diffusion coefficient calculated as the inverse of slope, was
around 0.002 mm2/s (Fig.4a). The CEST-weighted diffusion coefficient
was around 0.0003 mm2/s (Fig.4b).
(In vivo) The ADC maps were shown
in three axial slices (Fig.5a, b, c).
The MTR asymmetry maps at 3.5ppm showed amide proton exchange distribution in a
human brain with higher signals in gray matter than in white matter (Fig.5d, e, f). ADC of water was 0.001 mm2/s
on average across the slices (Fig.5g, h, i). The CEST-weighted ADC maps distinguished the
white matter tracks from gray matter tissues with higher ADC values in white matter than in gray matter in general (Fig.5j, k, l), opposite to the CEST maps with no diffusion weighting and different from ADC maps from the free water signals.Discussion & Conclusion
In this study, we demonstrate feasibility of diffusion-weighted
CEST imaging at 7T human MRI for the first time to our knowlege. This technique produced ADC maps based on CEST
signals as well as free water signals in a relatively high sensitivity and high
spatial resolutions. This study is different than diffusion weighted
spectroscopy4, in that the proposed diffusion-weighted CEST merely
measures diffusion coefficient of water, instead of diffusivity of metabolites.
This preliminary human brain results may be expanded with a higher
maximum b-value (>300) to account for intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)
effect and with a full z-spectrum to reduce NOE artifacts in brain. The proposed technique may be assessed using the IVIM approach to
distinguish the CEST signals inside and outside blood microcirculation. Further studies are necessary to understand the source of the diffusion-weighted CEST signals in general, which may allow us to understand human brain metabolites in a new
perspective.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Lee, H, Choi, SH, Sohn,
C‐H, Kim, S‐G, Lee, J, Park, J. Rapid three‐dimensional
steady‐state
chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 00: 1– 13. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28487
2.
Zhou, J., Blakeley,
J.O., Hua, J., Kim, M., Laterra, J., Pomper, M.G. and van Zijl, P.C. (2008),
Practical data acquisition method for human brain tumor amide proton transfer
(APT) imaging. Magn. Reson. Med., 60: 842-849. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21712
3.
Kim, M., Gillen, J.,
Landman, B.A., Zhou, J. and van Zijl, P.C. (2009), Water saturation shift
referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)
experiments. Magn. Reson. Med., 61: 1441-1450. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21873
4. Najac,
C., Branzoli, F., Ronen, I., & Valette, J. (2016). Brain intracellular
metabolites are freely diffusing along cell fibers in grey and white matter, as
measured by diffusion-weighted MR spectroscopy in the human brain at 7 T. Brain
structure & function, 221(3), 1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0968-5