Yi Chen1, Qi Wang1,2, Hang Zeng1,2, Kengo Takahashi1,2, Sangcheon Choi1,2, Chunqi Qian3, and Xin Yu1,4
1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany, 2Graduate Training Centre of Neuroscience, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, 3Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States, 4Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
Synopsis
To
improve MR detection sensitivity of multi-modal fMRI platform, we present inductive
coil which could relay locally detected MR signals to the external surface coil.
Under sensory stimulation, evoked whole brain EPI-based fMRI and enhanced focal
laminar-specific fMRI signals were acquired with high spatiotemporal resolution
(100 μm and 100 ms) using a single experimental setup. Moreover, embedding inductive
coil beneath the glue-secured optical fiber and the projection-mirrored cortex
on the other hemisphere boosted multiregional fMRI sensitivity to investigate
the interhemispheric connectivity with laminar-specificity. This is particularly
helpful to study the optogenetic-driven brain connectivity with circuit
specificity at multi-modal fMRI platform.
Introduction
Optical
fiber-mediated optogenetic activation in combination with functional magnetic
resonance imaging (fMRI) provides a multi-modal platform to decipher brain
dynamics from micro to mesoscales 1-3.
However, to secure optical fiber insertion into the brain, a conventional
surface coil needs to be placed above the rat brain with a certain distance separation,
leading to limited MR detection sensitivity and hindering the application of
multi-modal fMRI platform to specify brain physiology and pathology 4. To improve MR
detection sensitivity, inductively coupled detectors 5,
6 can be
placed near the region of interest to relay locally detected MR signals to the
external surface coil. Here, we demonstrate an inductive coil embedded beneath
the surface coil to obtain laminar-specific information for high spatiotemporal
resolution (100 μm and 100 ms) in both focal rat cortex and multiregional mapping
of the brain functional connectivity with the optogenetic tool. This study will
make it possible to decipher brain dynamics at multi-scale with a single experimental
setup, paving way for future utilization for sensitivity-enhanced multi-modal
imaging.Methods
A 6-mm single loop inductive coil was developed (Fig.1a) and embedded beneath the 22-mm
surface coil (Fig.1a,b) for
experiments in Fig.2. For
optogenetic experiments in Fig.3,
one 6-mm inductive coil was placed on the right FP-S1 glued with optical fiber
(200 μm), while the other one was placed on the projected FP-S1 in the left
hemisphere. The FLASH based bilateral line-scanning method was combining 2
saturation RF pulses to dampen the MR signal outside the regions of interest (Fig.2e) in a 14.1-T scanner with the
following parameters: TR/TE 100/9 ms, Excitation pulse angle 30°, slice
thickness 1 mm, FOV 6.4 x 6.4 mm2 and matrix 64x 32. The
phase-encoding gradient was turned off.
Functional activation
was detected by performing electrical stimulation on the left forepaw (3 Hz, 4 s,
2.5 mA) and optogenetic stimulation on right FP-S1 (2 Hz, 6 s, light pulse width
10 ms, 30 mW) to activate the neurons expressing AAV.CaMKII.ChR2.mCherry (Fig.3a). BLOCK design was 1-second
pre-stimulation, 4 (6) second stimulation and 15 (13) second post-stimulation and
32 epochs for the whole trial (10 m 40 s). All line-scanning method related data
analysis was performed using Matlab (Mathworks, Natick), while EPI-based fMRI
data analysis was performed using AFNI (NIH, Bethesda).Results
First,
a single loop inductive coil was placed on top of a 1% agarose gel phantom
while the surface coil above the phantom with certain distance would provide RF
excitation pulse and receive amplified signals from inductive coil (Fig.1a-c). As Fig.1d shows, the coupling effect and high focal signal enhancement
from the inductive coil could be maintained for a distance as far as 12 mm with
increased RF excitation power.
Next,
the inductive coil was evaluated in vivo
for enhanced fMRI signal in the right FP-S1 region upon electrical forepaw
stimulation (Fig.2a-c). As Fig.2d shows, the anatomical image with
superimposed whole brain EPI-based fMRI map demonstrates the signal enhancement
region that was well matched to the most activated region. Besides the
EPI-based BOLD, laminar-specific BOLD was acquired with the line scanning method (Fig.2e). The time courses and BOLD map
along cortical depth induced by forepaw stimulation (Fig.2f) were comparable to our previous results. Moreover, the tSNR
for resting-state brain fluctuation illustrates the inductive coil is up to 2-fold
more sensitive than our previous results detected with the surface coil (Fig.2g).
Last,
the inductive coil was combined with optogenetic tool to demonstrate its impressive
performance on multi-modal fMRI platform. Upon light stimulation, as expected,
robust activation was detected on the virus-infected right FP-S1 region (Fig.3a). Additionally, the BOLD map on
the projected left FP-S1 along cortical depth clearly indicates contralateral activation
(Fig.3a). The average BOLD map (Fig.3b) and time courses (Fig.3c) to each epoch of the left FP-S1
region show strong positive and negative BOLD responses in L2/3 and L5, indicating
that activation in the left hemisphere was most possibly induced
via corpus callosum by interhemispheric projections originating from the right
hemisphere. The tSNR for BOLD activation in both hemispheres are dramatically
increased, showing the inductive coil is up to 3-fold more
sensitive than our previous results detected with the surface coil, particularly on
the right hemisphere with inserted fiber (Fig.3d).
Different to the experiment without optical fiber above, the higher increased sensitivity
here clearly demonstrates the inductive coil compensates the signal loss
due to experiment complexity for multi-modal fMRI platform.Conclusion
We
present the multi-modal imaging scheme with implanted inductive coil, which yields
high-resolution structural and functional images of the rat brain with high
signal-to-noise ratio. The smaller sized inductive coil is inductively coupled with
larger RF coil allows us to obtain sensory stimulation evoked whole-brain EPI-based
fMRI and enhanced focal laminar-specific fMRI signals using a simplified
experimental setup. Moreover, it provides the possibility to boost
multiregional fMRI sensitivity to investigate the interhemispheric connectivity
by embedding inductive coil beneath glue secured optical fiber and projection mirrored
cortex on the other hemisphere. This is particularly helpful to study the
optogenetic-driven brain connectivity with circuit specificity at multi-modal
fMRI platform.Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the internal funding
from Max Planck Society, the NIH grants: 1RF1NS113278 and S10 instrument grant
(S10 MH124733) to Martinos Center, German Research Foundation Yu215/3-1, BMBF
01GQ1702. This project has received funding
from the European Union Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon
2020 (2014-2020) under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No.896245.References
1. Yu, X., et al., Sensory and optogenetically driven single-vessel fMRI. Nat Methods,
2016. 13(4): p. 337-40.
2. Lee, J.H.,
et al., Global and local fMRI signals
driven by neurons defined optogenetically by type and wiring. Nature, 2010.
465(7299): p. 788-92.
3. Ryali, S.,
et al., Combining optogenetic stimulation
and fMRI to validate a multivariate dynamical systems model for estimating
causal brain interactions. Neuroimage, 2016. 132: p. 398-405.
4. Lin, P., et
al., Optogenetic Functional MRI. J
Vis Exp, 2016(110).
5. Bilgen, M., Magnetic resonance microscopy of spinal cord
injury in mouse using a miniaturized implantable RF coil. Journal of
Neuroscience Methods, 2007. 159(1):
p. 93-97.
6. Jordan,
C.D., et al., Wireless Resonant Circuits
Printed Using Aerosol Jet Deposition for MRI Catheter Tracking. Ieee
Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2020. 67(3): p. 876-882.