Nikolai Avdievich1, Georgiy Solomakha2, Loreen Ruhm1, Anke Henning1,3, and Klaus Scheffler1
1High-field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Bilogical Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany, 2Physics and Engineering, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 3Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Synopsis
Dipole
antennas have been used for human imaging at ultra-high field (UHF, >7T).
However, for head imaging, dipoles must be substantially shortened, which often
cause poor (~ -10dB) decoupling. Common decoupling methods are difficult to use
due to distant location of dipoles. Alternatively, adjacent transmit dipoles
can be decoupled using passive dipole antennas placed parallel between them. Such
passive dipoles may interact destructively with the RF field of the transmit
array. In this work, we developed a novel decoupling method of adjacent transmit
dipoles by using modified perpendicular passive dipole antennas. The constructed
array demonstrated good decoupling and whole-brain coverage.
Purpose
To develop an unshielded transceiver
(TxRx) folded-end dipole array for human head imaging at 9.4T and improve
decoupling of adjacent dipole elements, a novel array design with modified
passive dipole antennas was developed, evaluated, and tested.Introduction
Dipole
antennas have recently been introduced (1) and used for human body imaging (1-3)
at ultra-high field (UHF, >7T). For head imaging, dipoles must be
substantially shortened (4-7). Such short dipoles are often decoupled only to
the level of ~-10dB (4,7), which is insufficient for optimal transmit (Tx)
performance. Common decoupling methods, which require electrical connections,
are difficult to use for decoupling of distantly located adjacent Tx-dipoles.
Alternatively, adjacent dipoles can be decoupled using passive dipole antennas placed between them (5,8). This
decoupling practice should be used with care since passive dipoles may interact
destructively with the RF-field, B1+, produced by the Tx-array (9). In this work, we developed a
novel decoupling method of adjacent Tx-dipoles by using modified passive dipole
antennas.Methods
The general idea behind the folded-end dipole
design is shown in Fig.1A. Commonly, the resonance frequency of a short dipole
antenna is decreased by connecting inductors in series. In such design, we “cut
out” the central part of the dipole current and voltage distributions, which is
“hidden” within the inductors. As a result, the “loaded” portion of the
distribution has large voltage values at both ends and a very non-uniform
current distribution. Alternatively, by folding the dipole (Fig.1B), we load only
its central portion, which has lower voltage values and a more uniform current.
Coupling between two Tx-dipole antennas produces two modes (Fig.1C). The anti-parallel
mode creates no RF field in the center between the dipoles. Thus, a parallel
passive decoupling dipole (Fig.1D, top) interacts only with the parallel mode.
Therefore, such passive dipole resonating higher than both modes can shift down
only the frequency of the parallel mode, which is adjusted by varying the
passive dipole resonance frequency. Degeneracy of the two modes corresponds to
decoupling of the Tx-dipoles. To minimize destructive interaction, we turned the
passive dipole by 90º (Fig.1D, bottom) and bent to increase coupling with the Tx-dipoles. Such passive dipole interacts only with the anti-parallel mode. By varying
the passive dipole resonance frequency, which is now lower than that of both
modes, the resonance frequency of the anti-parallel mode can be shifted up. Degeneracy
of the two modes corresponds to decoupling of the Tx-dipoles.
Electromagnetic
simulations were performed
using CST Studio Suite 2019 (CST, Darmstadt, Germany) and the time-domain
solver based on the finite-integration technique. We simulated several
8-element dipole arrays (folded-end and unfolded) decoupled using parallel and
perpendicular passive decoupling dipoles (Fig.2). After modeling, we
constructed an 8-element transceiver unshielded dipole array decoupled using
novel perpendicular passive dipoles (Fig.3B). The array measured 200mm in
width, 230mm in height, and 170mm in length. To increase B1+
field at the superior head locationad (10), we added a flat elliptical RF
shield (Fig.3A). All data were acquired on a Siemens Magnetom 9.4T human
imaging system.Results and Discussion
The array was well decoupled (Fig.3D). All adjacent
elements of the array were decoupled better than -15dB with an average S12
value of -18.1dB. Figs.2C,D show simulated transversal B1+
maps and their ratios obtained using decoupled folded-end dipole arrays.
Parallel passive dipoles produce a strong destructive interference with the B1+
field both at the periphery and the center of the phantom where the field is
reduced by 16%. Turning the passive dipoles by 90º substantially minimizes the
alteration of the RF-field both at the periphery and center (3% reduction).
Similar results were obtained for decoupling of the unfolded dipole array
(Fig.2B). Fig.4 displays sagittal B1+
and transversal SAR10g maps obtained using different 1x8 dipole
arrays loaded by a head voxel model. Increasing the fold size, which makes the
current distribution along the dipole more uniform (Fig.1B), extends the RF-field in both directions and ~1.5 times decreases the peak SAR10g
(slice 2, ears). SAR10g maps through the array center (slice 1) are
very similar. Optimal 30-mm bent folded-end dipole array also produced higher B1+/√P (7%) and
B1+/√pSAR10g
(~30%) than the unfolded array. Fig.5 shows in-vivo experimental data. The unshielded folded-end dipole array provided good coverage over the entire brain. Averaged over a
130-mm transversal slab, B1+
measures 9.3 μT/√kW.Conclusion
We developed a novel passive dipole design
for decoupling transmit human head dipole arrays. The new perpendicular
decoupling antennas produced substantially less destructive interference with
the RF-field of the array than the common parallel design. The constructed eight-element
dipole array demonstrated good decoupling and whole-brain coverage.Acknowledgements
Funding by the ERC Starting grant / SYNAPLAST /
679927 and the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT)
grant / RR180056 is kindly acknowledged.References
1) Raaijmakers AJE, Ipek O, Klomp DWJ et al. Magn Reson Med
2011;66:1488-1497. 2) Oezerdem C., Winter L., Graessl A. et
al. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:2553–2565.
3) Raaijmakers
AJE, Italiaander M, Voogt IJ et al. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:1366–1374. 4) Chen G, Cloos M, Sodickson D, and Wiggins G. Proc. ISMRM
2014, p.621. 5) Clément J, Gruetter R, and Ipek Ö. Magn Reson Med
2019;81:1447–1458. 6) Connell IRO, Mennon
RS IEEE Trans Med Imag 2019;38: 2177-2187. 7) Avdievich NI, Solomakha G, Ruhm
L, Scheffler K, Henning A. NMR in BioMed 2020;33:1-11. 8) Yan X, Zhang X, Wei L, Xue R. Appl Magn Res
2015;46:59-66. 9) Avdievich NI, Pan JW, and Hetherington HP. NMR in Biomed
2013;26(11):1547-1554. 10) Alecci M, Collins CM, James Wilson J, Liu W, Smith
MB, Jezzard P. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:363-370.