Enrica Wilken1, Felix Freppon1, Max Masthoff1, and Cornelius Faber1
1Translational Research Imaging Center, Clinic of Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
Synopsis
Repetitive T2*-weighted image acquisition in vivo
and contrast simulations were used to show that single iron oxide nanoparticle
labeled cells can be resolved and tracked non-invasively by time-lapse MRI.
Calculation of the velocity of intravascular moving immune cells in mice brain
and velocity-dependent blurring of time-lapse contrast in simulations indicate that
cell dynamics slower than 1 µm/s are detectable. Therefore, time-lapse MRI is
able to reveal patrolling immune cells as hypointense spots and can be a
suitable tool to study inflammatory diseases and the progression of cancer
metastasis.
Introduction
With growing knowledge of cell interactions and related therapeutic
strategies, it becomes increasingly important to resolve single-cell dynamics.1
However, established means of cell tracking, like intravital microscopy, are
invasive, have a limited tissue penetration or field of view.2
Contrarily, T2*-weighted MRI provides a non-invasive tool and several studies
were able to track cell distributions or acquire static snapshots of single
cells.3 Yet, the actual intravascular cell migration could not be
revealed and it was the MRI time-lapse concept that allowed resolving
single-cell movement in mice brain non-invasively for the first time. Movies
showing single-cell motion were created by composing T2*-weighted images of
repetitive MRI acquisition and whole-brain coverage enabled the analysis of
three-dimensional cell motion behavior.4,5
Here, we address the velocity detection limit of time-lapse MRI by
tracking iron-labeled immune cells in vivo and by simulating motion-dependent
blurring of image contrast.Methods
MRI and analysis. Time-lapse MRI of female C57BL/6 mice brain (n=8) was
performed using a 9.4 T Biospec (Bruker Biospin, Ettlingen, Germany) with
cryogenic probe. T2*-weighted images were acquired with a gradient echo
sequence with the following scan parameters: TR: 643 ms, TE: 8.0 ms, FA: 60°,
averages: 4, image matrix: 180 x 256, in-plane resolution: 67 x 55 µm2,
38 slices, slice thickness: 300 µm, scan time: 8 min 12 s, 20 repetitions. Monocytes
were labeled in vivo by i.v. injection of 1.9 ml per kg/BW Ferucarotran
(Resovist® Bayer AG) via the tail vein 24 h prior to MRI. Further, individual
immune cells were identified as hypointense spots, manually counted, and
tracked with ImageJ.
Simulations. MATLAB
simulations of time-lapse contrast were based on simulations by Masthoff et al.4.
Initially, a synthetic phantom with intensity 1 and size of 180 x 256 voxels
was created and cells were added by 4 voxel signal voids at random positions.
More precisely, the intensity in the central voxel was reduced to 0.5, and in
two directly adjacent voxels and the one in between and diagonally neighboring
the central voxel to 0.7. A diagonal in-plane movement was then simulated by
stepwise in- or decreasing the position in the horizontal and vertical
direction. For every frame, k space was calculated by Fourier transformation of
the image. Further, synthetic k space was created by filling it with fractions
of the Fourier transforms, i.e. 8 lines of every k space corresponding to 32
frames for cartesian sampling. Similarly, for a radial sampling scheme, 8 out
of 256 spokes separated by the golden angle6 were used as fractions
for the artificial k space. An image of the simulated moving cells was then
acquired by the inverse Fourier transform of the assembled k space (Fig. 1).
The image represents a single timeframe with cells moving 32 voxels during
acquisition. In addition, to account for smaller velocities, cells remained in
their spot and moved to the next voxel after 2, 4, 8, or 16 frames. To simulate
a static cell, the signal void stayed in its position for 32 frames. Finally,
an overlay of real MRI data and simulations was done by a voxelwise
multiplication of the two images.Results and Discussion
Repetitive T2*-weighted imaging allowed detection and tracking of intravascular
moving monocytes in mice brain as hypointense spots in consecutive timeframes
(Fig. 2a). Additionally, the motion velocity of cells moving across several
voxels was determined to be 0.19 ± 0.01 µm/s from n=61 cells (Fig. 2b).
Moreover, with an acquisition time of 8 mins 12 s and a resolution of 67 x 55 µm2,
we simulated time-lapse contrast of moving cells with velocities of 0, 0.35,
0.70, 1.41, 2.82, and 5.64 µm/s by cartesian and radial sampling of synthetic k
space (Fig. 3). The performed superposition with an actual brain MRI image does
not only consider noise, distorting structures, and imaging artifacts but also
enables a direct comparison of the contrast caused by in vivo labeled and
simulated cells. The chosen size and intensity of the artificial cells were
found to represent experimentally observed signal voids well. Further, the
simulations showed that static and slowly moving cells are clearly visible for
both, cartesian and radial, sampling schemes. However, with increasing speed of
cell migration, contrast becomes blurred and is not sufficiently generated for
single-cell detection when cells move faster than 1 µm/s.
We conclude that time-lapse MRI can resolve iron-labeled single-cell
motion slower than 1 µm/s. Since the calculated mean velocity of moving
monocytes lies perfectly in range with the speed of patrolling immune cells
(0.2 µm/s)7, we suppose that time-lapse MRI can track the patrolling
motion behavior, but not rolling cells as these are linked to higher velocities
(40 µm/s)2,7.Conclusion
We have shown that time-lapse MRI enables the detection of intravascular
dynamics of iron-labeled cells in mice brain. Since only slow motion (<1 µm/s)
creates a sufficient contrast and faster moving cells are not yet
distinguishable from tissue, we aim at accelerating image acquisition by less
averaging, compressed sensing, and radial sampling in the future. Therefore, we
hope to track not only patrolling but rolling monocytes as well. We understand
time-lapse MRI as being a non-invasive tool to further study immune responses
under inflammatory stimuli and cancer progression.Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the German Research
Foundation (DFG; SFB 1009 TP-Z02 to CF), the Joachim Herz Foundation (Add-on
Fellowship for Interdisciplinary Life Sciences to MM), the Interdisciplinary
Centre for Clinical Research (IZKF, core unit PIX) and the Medical Faculty of
the University of Muenster (MEDK dissertation fellowship to FF).References
-
Perrin J, Capitao M, Mougin-Degraef M, et al. Cell Tracking in Cancer
Immunotherapy. Front Med
(Lausanne). 2020;7:34.
Published 2020 Feb 14. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.00034
- Karreman MA,
Hyenne V, Schwab Y, Goetz JG. Intravital Correlative
Microscopy: Imaging Life at the Nanoscale. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26(11):848-863. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2016.07.003
- Shapiro EM, Sharer K, Skrtic S, Koretsky AP. In vivo
detection of single cells by MRI. Magn
Reson Med. 2006;55(2):242-249.
doi:10.1002/mrm.20718
- Masthoff M, Gran S, Zhang X,
et al. Temporal window for detection of inflammatory disease using dynamic cell
tracking with time-lapse MRI. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9563. Published 2018 Jun 22.
doi:10.1038/s41598-018-27879-z
- Mori Y, Chen
T, Fujisawa T, et al. From cartoon to real time MRI:
in vivo monitoring of phagocyte migration in mouse brain. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6997. Published 2014 Nov
11. doi:10.1038/srep06997
- Winkelmann S, Schaeffter T,
Koehler T, Eggers H, Doessel O. An optimal radial profile order based on the
Golden Ratio for time-resolved MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007;26(1):68-76.
doi:10.1109/TMI.2006.885337
- Auffray C, Fogg D, Garfa M, et al. Monitoring of blood vessels and tissues by a population of monocytes with
patrolling behavior. Science. 2007;317(5838):666-670.
doi:10.1126/science.1142883