Yannick Brackenier1,2, Lucilio Cordero-Grande1,2,3, Raphael Tomi-Tricot1,2,4, Tom Wilkinson1,2, Jan Sedlacik1,2, Philippa Bridgen1,2, Sharon Giles1,2, Shaihan Malik1,2, Enrico De Vita1,2, and Joseph V Hajnal1,2
1Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 3Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and CIBER-BNN, Madrid, Spain, 4MR Research Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Limited, Frimley, United Kingdom
Synopsis
A fully data-driven retrospective motion correction reconstruction for volumetric brain MRI at 7T that includes
modelling of pose-dependent changes in polarising magnetic (B0) fields in the head has been developed. Building on the DISORDER framework, the use of a physics-based B0 model constrains the number of unknowns to be found, enabling motion correction
based solely on data-consistency without requiring any additional probe- or
navigator-data. The proposed reconstruction was validated on an in-vivo spoiled gradient echo acquisition in which the subject deliberately moved. Substantial removal of motion artefacts was achieved.
Introduction
Tissue susceptibility causes the polarising
magnetic field (B0) in the head to be spatially varying and pose dependent1,
altering the signal acquired in MRI2. Although having limited effect
for small motion3 or clinical field strengths4, these B0
drifts hamper motion correction for increased motion levels at ultra-high field
(UHF) and need to be included in the forward model5. Navigators and
NMR probes have been used to measure pose-dependent fields but require
additional hardware and/or scanning time and usually have limited temporal or spatial
resolution6,7. This work extends the DISORDER motion correction
framework4, which leverages optimized Cartesian sampling, by including
a physics-based model to account for pose-dependent B0 fields, resulting in a
fully data-driven, retrospective motion correction.Methods
For volumetric encoding with Cartesian
sampling, the DISORDER framework achieves motion correction by dividing k-space
profiles (readouts) in temporal segments and allowing each segment to have a
distinct motion state. This allows high (sub-second) temporal motion
reconstruction as parallel imaging provides an over-determined problem to solve.
However, adding a volumetric voxel-based estimation of the spatially varying B0
at every segment would make the reconstruction under-determined and a more
compact B0 representation is needed. Building on prior studies8,9, we observed that relative changes in B0 fields in the moving head frame due to motion at segment $$$s$$$ consist
of a background field, represented well by lower-degree (2 here) solid harmonics (SH), and
localised fields close to air tissue interfaces, which are proportional to the pitch and roll rotation angles $$$\theta_{pitch}$$$ and $$$\theta_{roll}$$$ (Fig. 1):
$$\omega_s(\textbf{r}) = d_{pitch}(\textbf{r})\theta_{s,pitch} + d_{roll}(\textbf{r})\theta_{s,roll} + \sum_{n=0}^2 SH_n(\textbf{r}) c_{n,s}\qquad(1)$$
where $$$\textbf{d}(\textbf{r})$$$ are the linear maps in $$$\boldsymbol{\theta}$$$, $$$SH_n$$$ the set of the solid harmonics of degree n with segment-dependent coefficients $$$c_{n,s}$$$.
$$$c_{n,s}$$$ includes pose-dependent B0 effects (e.g. head-body orientation) as well as
pose-independent B0 effects (breathing, scanner drift, etc)10. Both linear maps
$$$\textbf{d}(\textbf{r})$$$ are smooth
and sparse in space, reducing their parameter space even further. B0 fields
are estimated based on data-consistency and incorporated in the DISORDER joint
image ($$$\boldsymbol{\hat x}$$$) and rigid motion ($$$\boldsymbol{\hat z_s}$$$) reconstruction by replacing
the Discrete Fourier operator $$$\boldsymbol{F}$$$ with a field-dependent Fourier operator $$$\boldsymbol{F_{\omega_{s}}}$$$11. For spoiled sequences, the latter reduces to $$$\boldsymbol{FP_{\omega_s}}$$$ where $$$\boldsymbol{P_{\omega_s}}$$$ is a segment-dependent phase term. By commuting $$$\boldsymbol{P_{\omega_s}}$$$ and $$$\boldsymbol{ST_{z_s}}$$$, the phase term is applied in the native image space (head frame), which is consistent with the $$$\omega_s(\textbf{r})$$$ definition:
$$\boldsymbol{\hat x},\boldsymbol{\hat z_s},\boldsymbol{\hat \omega_s} = argmin_{\boldsymbol{ x},\boldsymbol{ z_s},\boldsymbol{\omega_s}} \sum_{s'}||\boldsymbol{A_{s'} FST_{z_{s'}}P_{\omega_{s'}}x-y_{s'}}||_{2}^{2}\qquad(2)$$
where $$$s'$$$ sums over all segments and $$$\boldsymbol{T_{z_s}}$$$, $$$\boldsymbol{S}$$$, $$$\boldsymbol{A_{s}}$$$, $$$\boldsymbol{y_{s}}$$$ respectively represent rigid motion, coil
sensitivities, sampled profiles and measured data for segment $$$s$$$, as defined in DISORDER4. The
DISORDER iterative solver is augmented with a Gradient Descent optimizer for $$$c_{n,s}$$$ at every segment
and a Fast Iterative Thresholding Algorithm (FISTA)12 for the
regularised $$$d(\textbf{r})$$$ update:
$$\boldsymbol{d^{i+1}} = argmin_{\boldsymbol{d}} \sum_{s'}||\boldsymbol{A_{s'} F S T_{z_{s'}}P_{\omega_{s'}}x-y_{s'}}||_{2}^{2} + ||\boldsymbol{d}||_1 + ||\boldsymbol{D}\boldsymbol{d}||_2^2 \qquad(3)$$
where $$$\boldsymbol{D}$$$ is the finite-difference operator to enforce
smoothness. The proposed reconstruction was tested in simulations and validated
in-vivo for a spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) sequence on a 7T scanner (MAGNETOM
Terra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). A volunteer was asked to deliberately
move position every 20 seconds. Sequence parameters: 1.5mm isotropic resolution, 0.66s
DISORDER motion resolution, TR=10ms, TE=5ms,
flip angle FA=7$$$^{\circ}$$$, FOV=220×240×200
(IS/AP/LR), readout along IS, scan duration
TA=2min57s with no repeats and no acceleration.Results
Fig. 2 shows magnitude images from the
different reconstructions. A clear reduction in motion corruption is observed for
the proposed motion and B0 corrected reconstructions. This results in an
overall increase in contrast and a recovered signal in areas close to
air-tissue interfaces. Only considering the SH does not greatly improve reconstruction (not shown), whereas the linear maps $$$d(\textbf{r})$$$ alone contribute most to the improved image reconstruction. Although motion corruption is reduced when
accounting for B0 variation, the proposed reconstruction still contains residual artefacts and lower signal to noise ratio (SNR) compared to a motion-free
scan. Linear maps $$$d_{pitch}(\textbf{r})$$$ and $$$d_{roll}(\textbf{r})$$$ are shown in Fig. 3 and agree with the literature8,13,14
and our own observations from motion-free data both in terms of dynamic ranges (up
to 10Hz/degree) and spatial distributions (near air-tissue interfaces). Estimated
motion parameters for the different reconstructions are shown in Fig. 4. Including
the B0 model in the reconstruction results in more stable and realistic motion
traces. Finally, SH coefficient traces are shown in Fig. 5 and follow the
motion pattern, with fluctuations superposed, which probably come from confounding
factors (e.g. respiration), as previously suggested5. This confirms
that $$$c_{n,s}$$$ includes pose-dependent and pose-independent effects.Discussion
We have shown improved motion correction for UHF brain imaging by incorporating an explicit pose dependent B0 field term, using a compact physics-based
model. Substantial reduction of motion artefacts was achieved in multiple test scans, however, as the conditioning of Equation (3) is determined by the
variability of the motion parameters, simulations and in-vivo data show that the added benefit of the proposed reconstruction reduces in scans with little
motion.Conclusion
We have demonstrated the feasibility of fully data-driven retrospective rigid motion correction at UHF by including pose dependent B0 fields. Our
method does not require any additional hardware or scanning time and once
refined can be easily translated into other sequences.Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge
funding from the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Smart Medical Imaging
(EP/S022104/1).References
1.
Liu, J.,
Zwart, J.D., Gelderen, P.V., Murphy-Boesch, J., & Duyn, J. (2018). Effect
of head motion on MRI B0 field distribution. Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine, 80, 2538 - 2548.
2. Barmet
C., Pruessmann K. (2013). Sensitivity encoding and B0 inhomogeneity - A simultaneous
reconstruction approach. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 13
3. Cordero-Grande
L., Tomi-Tricot R., Ferrazzi F., Sedlacik J., Malik S., and Hajnal JV. (2020). Preserved
high resolution brain MRI by data-driven DISORDER motion correction. Proc.
Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 20
4. Cordero-Grande,
L., Ferrazzi, G., Teixeira, R.P., O’Muircheartaigh, J., Price, A., &
Hajnal, J. (2020). Motion‐corrected MRI with DISORDER: Distributed and
incoherent sample orders for reconstruction deblurring using encoding
redundancy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 84, 713 - 726.
5. Liu, J.,
Gelderen, P., Zwart, J.D., & Duyn, J. (2019). Reducing motion sensitivity
in 3D high-resolution T2*-weighted MRI by navigator-based motion and nonlinear
magnetic field correction. NeuroImage, 116332 .
6. Wallace,
T.E., Afacan, O., Kober, T., & Warfield, S. (2019). Rapid measurement and
correction of spatiotemporal B0 field changes using FID navigators and a
multi‐channel reference image. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 83, 575 -
589.
7. Sipilä,
Pekka Tapani et al. “Robust, susceptibility-matched NMR probes for compensation
of magnetic field imperfections in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).” Sensors
and Actuators A-physical 145 (2008): 139-146.
8. Sulikowska,
A. (2016). Motion correction in high-field MRI. PhD thesis, University
if Nottingham.
9. Marques, J., & Bowtell, R. (2005).
Application of a Fourier‐based method for rapid calculation of field
inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts
in Magnetic Resonance Part B-magnetic Resonance Engineering, 25, 65-78.
10. Moortele, P.V., Pfeuffer, J., Glover, G., Ugurbil, K., & Hu, X. (2002). Respiration‐induced B0 fluctuations and their spatial distribution in the human brain at 7 Tesla. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 47.
11. Matakos, A., & Fessler, J. (2010). Joint
estimation of image and fieldmap in parallel MRI using single-shot
acquisitions. 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging:
From Nano to Macro, 984-987.
12. Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009). A Fast
Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems. SIAM
J. Imaging Sci., 2, 183-202.
13. Andersson,
J., Graham, M., Drobnjak, I., Zhang, H., & Campbell, J. (2018).
Susceptibility-induced distortion that varies due to motion: Correction in
diffusion MR without acquiring additional data. Neuroimage, 171, 277 -
295.
14. Yarach, U., Luengviriya, C., Stucht, D.,
Godenschweger, F., Schulze, P., & Speck, O. (2015). Correction of
B0-induced geometric distortion variations in prospective motion correction for
7T MRI. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 29,
319-332.