Zheyuan Yi1,2,3, Yujiao Zhao1,2, Yilong Liu1,2, Yang Gao1,2, Mengye Lyu4, Fei Chen3, and Ed X Wu1,2
1Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, 2Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, 3Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China, 4College of Health Science and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China
Synopsis
In conventional parallel imaging, coil sensitivity information can be
obtained from calibration data for reconstruction that inevitably prolongs MRI
scan. In recent years, structured low-rank matrix completion methods implicitly
exploit coil sensitivity that enables calibrationless k-space estimation while
prohibitively increases the computational burden. This study presents a fast
and calibrationless image-space alternative for reconstruction that derives
high-quality coil sensitivity and spatial support maps by structured low-rank
tensor estimation. The proposed approach was evaluated with multi-channel
multi-contrast brain datasets. It achieves a high convergence rate with
significantly reduced reconstruction time, making the calibrationless
reconstruction approach more efficient in clinical practice.
Introduction
Parallel imaging has been applied routinely, which can be categorized as
using the explicit knowledge of coil sensitivity (e.g., SENSE1) or exploiting the
corresponding k-space relation (e.g., GRAPPA2) from either the
calibration scan or autocalibrating signals. Calibrationless low-rank techniques3-5
enable simultaneous autocalibration and k-space reconstruction while prohibitively
increase the computational burden, especially for clinical multi-modality MRI. In
this study, we propose a fast and calibrationless image-space alternative for reconstruction that can efficiently derive high-quality coil sensitivity and spatial support6,7 maps by the low-rank
method. This developed approach significantly reduces the computation time for reconstructing
multi-channel multi-contrast MR datasets and yields comparable image quality to
corresponding calibrationless low-rank reconstruction8-10.Theory and Methods
Structured Low-rank Tensor
Estimation for Coil Sensitivity and Spatial Support
Calibrationless
low-rank reconstruction can be typically described as the subspace approach
that characterizes linear relations of MR k-space data by forming a structured
low-rank matrix. In theory, the signal and null subspace of such structured
matrix are spanned by coil sensitivity (presented as eigenvectors11) and spatial
support12,13. To efficiently estimate shared coil sensitivity and
spatial support in this study, multi-contrast k-space data has been structured
into a low-rank tensor, as shown in Figure
1. Subsequent higher-order singular value decomposition serves to identify
both the signal- and null- subspace bases. Note that the proposed method transforms
all bases to image space rather than directly approximating k-space data in conventional
low-rank reconstruction. As each subspace base characterizes part of coil
sensitivity and spatial support information, the summation of bases would
estimate coil sensitivity and spatial support maps without losing the phase
information.
Image-space Reconstruction
With estimated coil sensitivity maps, the standard SENSE reconstruction
can be performed to provides a regularized least-squares solution. In the proposed method, multi-channel spatial support maps derived from null-subspace
bases are also incorporated for more accurate SENSE reconstruction with the observation that estimated coil sensitivity and spatial support are nearly orthogonal
complements with each other (coil sensitivity + spatial support = 1 for every
pixel). While coil sensitivity and spatial support maps derived from
calibrationless low-rank tensor estimation may contain errors due to
undersampling, the proposed reconstruction is performed as the iterative
estimation of coil sensitivity and MR images with a high convergency rate. As a
comparison, corresponding calibrationless low-rank reconstruction (MC-HTC)9,10 has been performed that iteratively approximates
the low-rank tensor and enforces data consistency.
Data Preparation
Fully
sampled 8-channel brain datasets of four typical MRI contrasts were acquired on
a 3T scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherland) with identical locations (matrix
size 200 × 200). For T1-weighted (T1W) acquisition, 2D fast field echo (FFE)
was used. For T2-weighted (T2W), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR),
and T1-weighted inversion recovery (T1W-IR) acquisitions, 2D fast spin echo
(FSE) was used.
For
evaluation, multi-contrast k-space data were retrospectively undersampled using uniform undersampling patterns (R = 4) with phase-encoding directions
orthogonally alternated among different contrasts to enhance sampling
incoherency in low-rank estimation.Results
As shown in Figure 2, coil
sensitivity and spatial support maps estimated from fully sampled reference
data are nearly orthogonal complements for each channel and sum-of-square (SOS)
combined images within the brain region. In contrast, coil sensitivity and
spatial support maps have estimation errors due to undersampling but can be
efficiently corrected after the proposed iterative image-space reconstruction. The
proposed method exhibited a rapid convergency rate (Figure 3) and required only 250 seconds (using a personal desktop
with 4-core i5-6500 and 16GB RAM) for jointly reconstructing 8-channel
4-contrast datasets (1 minute per contrast), whereas the corresponding k-space
low-rank reconstruction was at least 8 times slower. This fast approach provided
very similar reconstruction performance without compromising image quality (Figure 4).Discussion and Conclusions
This study
presents a fast and calibrationless image-space reconstruction alternative to k-space reconstruction for multi-contrast MRI. This approach estimates both coil sensitivity and
spatial support maps by low-rank tensor estimation, which can be considered as converting
calibrationless low-rank reconstruction into efficient iterative SENSE
reconstruction. Although this approach was demonstrated by jointly
reconstructing multi-contrast images using low-rank tensor estimation in this
study, it can also generalize to other structured low-rank methods based on
subspace analysis, making the existing calibrationless reconstruction approach
more efficient in clinical practice. Note that this approach exhibits rapid
convergency rate and thus may yield a magnitude order of acceleration in
reconstruction time by using a larger (even 3D) kernel for constructing the
low-rank matrix/tensor.
Several
methods have also considered exploiting k-space data relation for estimating
either coil sensitivity (e.g., ESPIRiT11) or spatial
support (e.g., PRUNO12 and AC-LORAKS14), but none of them
utilizing both coil sensitivity and spatial support with complementary
information. More importantly, all these methods require calibration data that
may suffer from inaccuracy caused by motion, causing artifacts in reconstruction.
Note that the proposed method can provide high-quality coil sensitivity maps
with coil sensitivity information only around the brain region. This can be
considered as simultaneously achieving the estimation and masking of coil
sensitivity maps that can suppress the propagation of noise in the background
region during reconstruction. Acknowledgements
This study
was supported by Hong Kong Research Grant Council (R7003-19, C7048-16G,
HKU17112120, HKU17103819 and HKU17104020), Guangdong Key Technologies for
Treatment of Brain Disorders (2018B030332001), and Guangdong Key Technologies
for Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2018B030336001).References
[1] Pruessmann KP,
Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.
Magn Reson Med 1999;42(5):952-962.
[2] Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM et al. Generalized autocalibrating
partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47(6):1202-1210.
[3] Shin PJ, Larson PEZ, Ohliger MA et al. Calibrationless parallel imaging
reconstruction based on structured low-rank matrix completion. Magn Reson Med
2014;72(4):959-970.
[4] Haldar JP, Zhuo J. P-LORAKS: Low-rank
modeling of local k-space neighborhoods with parallel imaging data. Magn Reson
Med 2016;75(4):1499-1514.
[5] Lee D, Jin KH, Kim EY, Park SH, Ye JC.
Acceleration of MR parameter mapping using annihilating filter-based low rank
hankel matrix (ALOHA). Magn Reson Med 2016;76(6):1848-1864.
[6] Plevritis SK, Macovski A. Spectral
extrapolation of spatially bounded images [MRI application]. IEEE Trans Med
Imaging 1995;14(3):487-497.
[7] Haldar JP. Low-Rank Modeling of Local
k-Space Neighborhoods (LORAKS) for Constrained MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging
2014;33(3):668-681.
[8] Liu Y, Cao J, Lyu M, Wu E.
Calibration-less parallel imaging reconstruction using hankel tensor completion
(HTC). In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Honolulu, HI, USA,
2017, p 445.
[9] Yi Z, Liu Y, Chen F, Wu E. Joint
Calibrationless Reconstruction of Highly Undersampled Multi-contrast MR
Datasets Using A Novel Low-Rank Completion Approach. In: Proceedings of the
27th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2019, p 4746.
[10] Liu Y, Yi Z, Zhao Y et al. Calibrationless parallel imaging reconstruction for
multislice MR data using low-rank tensor completion. Magn Reson Med
2021;85(2):897-911.
[11] Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ et al. ESPIRiT-an eigenvalue approach
to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med
2014;71(3):990-1001.
[12] Zhang J, Liu C, Moseley ME. Parallel reconstruction
using null operations. Magn Reson Med 2011;66(5):1241-1253.
[13] Haldar JP, Setsompop K. Linear
Predictability in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction: Leveraging
Shift-Invariant Fourier Structure for Faster and Better Imaging. IEEE Signal
Processing Magazine 2020;37(1):69-82.
[14] Lobos RA, Javed A, Nayak KS, Hoge WS,
Haldar JP. ROBUST AUTOCALIBRATED LORAKS FOR EPI GHOST CORRECTION. Proceedings
IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2018;2018:663-666.