Xiaowei Zhuang1,2, Lauren Bennett3, Virendra Mishra1, Zhengshi Yang1,2, Karthik Sreenivasan1,2, Aaron Ritter1, Charles Bernick1,4, and Dietmar Cordes1,2,5
1Lou Ruvo Center For Brain Health, Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 3Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, United States, 4UW Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States, 5University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
Synopsis
Longitudinal changes in fighters’ cognitive performance and brain structural
(cortical thickness) and functional (seeded functional connectivity) measures following
their transitions to inactive fighting status were investigated and compared
with fighters who remain active. A linear mixed effect model was applied for
each measure. When fighters transitioned to inactive status, improvements in
cognitive performances, structural thickness measures and related functional connectivity
measures are evident. In contrast, in fighters who continue to compete in
professional matches, neuropsychological performances and structural and
functional brain measures are observed to remain largely stable or reflect
subtle declines across time points.
Introduction
Repetitive head trauma common in combat sports is a risk
factor for multiple neuro-degenerative disorders1,2. Previous studies have
associated repetitive head injuries with both cognitive impairment and
structural or functional brain damages in active professional fighters3,4. However, it remains unclear
whether these noted cognitive and brain impairments will progress further,
remain stable, or recover once fighters retire at a relatively young age. In
this study, we investigate the longitudinal changes in fighters’ cognitive
performance and brain structural and functional measures following their
transitions to inactive fighting status and compare these changes with fighters
who remain active. Method
Subjects. Longitudinal
demographics, fighting histories, neuropsychological performance, and imaging
data from 29 inactive fighters and 29 matched active fighters were obtained from
the Professional Brain Health Study (PFBHS)5. At time point 1 (TP1), all
58 fighters actively participated in professional matches; at time point 2
(TP2), inactive fighters had been at least two years without a professional
match while active fighters continued competing in professional matches. As
listed in Table 1, active fighters were matched to inactive fighters in
terms of demographics (e.g. age, sex, education, and race), number of
professional fights at TP1, and time differences between TP1 and TP2. Neuropsychological
measures. The CNS Vital Sign tests were used to evaluate cognitive,
executive, and processing speed functions in all fighters at both TPs. Imaging
data acquisition and analysis. At each TP, resting-state fMRI data
were collected for all subjects on a 3T Siemens scanner
(TR/TE/resolution=2.8s/28ms/2x2x4mm3, 30 slices, axial acquisition,
137 time frames). A T1-weighted structural image was also acquired with a
standard MPRAGE sequence. Each T1 image was input to the FreeSurfer pipeline
and a subject-specific anatomical segmentation was generated with 68 cortical regions
of interest (ROI) based on Desikan-Killiany6 atlas and 12 sub-cortical regions.
Cortical thickness measures for 68 cortical regions were obtained for each
subject as structural measures. To compute the functional connectivity (FC)
measures, the subject-specific parcellation was co-registered to fMRI native
space using a 12 parameter-affine transformation. After standard preprocessing
steps, average resting-state fMRI time series were obtained for 80 ROIs in each
fighter. Statistical analysis. A linear mixed effect (LME)
model was applied to investigate the longitudinal changes for each
neuropsychological, structural, and FC measure. Fixed effects in the LME model included
group (active or inactive at TP2) effect, time effect and interaction effect between
group and time; additional fixed effects of age, sex, education level and race
were also included in the LME model as covariates. The intercept and time varied
by subject and were considered as random effects in the LME model. Regions with
significant interaction effect at p<0.01 in structural thickness analysis,
and their contralateral regions were used as seed regions to obtain FC
measures, which were computed as the Pearson’s correlations between each seed
regions and 80 ROIs.Result
As shown in Fig. 1A, at TP2, inactive
fighters demonstrate improved verbal memory (VM), processing speed (PSS), psychomotor
speed (PSY) performances, and a reduced reaction time (RT), as compared to TP1;
whereas active fighters’ performances were largely stable, with subtle declines
on measures of VM and PSY across TPs. After false discovery rate (FDR)
corrections, a significant interaction effect (pFDR<0.05) remains
for VM and PSY performances in the LME model (Fig. 1B). For cortical thickness
measures, after FDR correction, significant time effects (pFDR<0.05)
are observed in the bilateral posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and right isthmus
cingulate cortex (iCC, Fig. 2B). More interestingly, at the significance level
of p<0.01, different changing trajectories across two TPs between active and
inactive fighters were observed (Fig. 2A), with inactive fighters demonstrating
a recovered thickness in the left insula, left rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC)
and right rostral middle frontal cortex (rMFC), whereas active fighters show
stable or slight decrease in thickness measures of these regions. These three
regions, and their contralateral sides, are used as seed regions in the FC
analysis. As shown in Fig. 3A and B, improved FC are observed for inactive
fighters in bilateral rACC connections, whereas active fighters demonstrate
stable or reduced FC values. The interaction effect of FC between right rACC
and right iCC remains significant after FDR correction (Table 2). In Fig. 3D,
we visualize all FC with a significant interaction effect at p<0.01, which
demonstrate recoveries only in inactive fighters, but not active fighters.
These are mainly frontal-occipital and frontal-cingulate connections.Discussion and Conclusion
Our findings demonstrate that when
fighters transitioned to inactive status, improvements in cognitive performances,
structural thickness measures and related functional connectivity measures are
evident. In contrast, in fighters who continue to compete in professional
matches, neuropsychological performances and structural and functional brain
measures are observed to remain largely stable or reflect subtle declines across
time points.Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant
1R01EB014284, R01NS117547, P20GM109025 and P20AG068053), a private grant from
the Peter and Angela Dal Pezzo funds, a private grant from Lynn and William
Weidner, a private grant from Stacie and Chuck Matthewson and the young
scientist award at Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (Keep
Memory Alive Foundation). The PFBHS is supported by Bellator, UFC, the August Rapone
Family Foundation, Top Rank, and Haymon Boxing.References
- Bazarian, J. J., Cernak, I., Noble-Haeusslein, L.,
Potolicchio, S. & Temkin, N. Long-term neurologic outcomes after traumatic
brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 24, 439–451 (2009).
-
Jordan, B. D. The clinical spectrum of sport-related
traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 9, 222–230 (2013).
- Bernick, C. et al. Repeated head trauma is associated
with smaller thalamic volumes and slower processing speed: The Professional
Fighters’ Brain Health Study. Br. J. Sports Med. 49, 1007–1011
(2015).
- Mishra, V. R. et al. Understanding white matter
structural connectivity differences between cognitively impaired and
nonimpaired active professional fighters. Hum. Brain Mapp. hbm.24761
(2019). doi:10.1002/hbm.24761
-
Bernick, C. et al. Professional fighters brain health
study: Rationale and methods. Am. J. Epidemiol. 178, 280–286
(2013).
-
Desikan, R. S. et al. An automated labeling system for
subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of
interest. Neuroimage 31, 968–980 (2006).