Runke Wang1, Suhao Qiu1, Zhiyong Zhang1, and Yuan Feng1
1School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Accelerating magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is desired for
improved patient care and image quality. In this study, we proposed a
multiphase radial DENSE MRE (MRD-MRE) sequence, and a compressed sensing based reconstruction
algorithm using the sparsity of harmonic motion. A spatial
modulation of magnetization (SPAMM) shot was applied for motion encoding together with a radial sampling
scheme for acceleration. Reconstruction accuracy was improved by utilizing the
temporal sparsity of harmonic motion. Phantom and brain imaging showed that an
acceleration factor up to 4 could be reached.
Introduction
MR elastography (MRE) is a
non-invasive method to estimate the mechanical properties of soft tissues1. Recording multiple phases and directions of wave propagation are always desired. However, multiphase, multi-direction MRE usually comes with an
extended scan time. Several EPI or spiral based MRE sequences have been
developed for acceleration2,3, along
with reconstruction methods for fast MRE imaging4. Recently, Strasser et al. (2019) used DENSE based encoding for
multiphase MRE and showed advantages in low frequency MRE with improved
acquisition efficiency5. In this study, we proposed a multiphase, radially sampled, DENSE
based MRE sequence (MRD-MRE) for fast MRE. A reconstruction algorithm using the
feature of harmonic motion and compressed sensing (CS) was also proposed.Methods
For the MRD-MRE sequence
(Figure 1), the initial position of the tissue was encoded in the longitudinal
magnetization with a spatial modulation of magnetization (SPAMM). Continuous
vibration was triggered after the motion encoding gradient (MEG) Ge. For fast
and accurate motion encoding, the initial position was encoded only once. The
following motion was decoded by a decoding gradient (MDG) Gdn. Therefore,
the initial phase offset could be controlled by adjusting the time interval
between the trigger signal and the first MDG Gd1. Arbitrary
sampling intervals for the wave propagation recording could be set by TR and the
position of Gdn. The
radial spokes were continuously acquired with a golden angle apart based on a gradient-echo
sequence. Every 4 radial spokes within one vibration period were considered as
a group. Hence, the number of groups after one SPAMM modulation determined the
undersampling rate, while the amount of SPAMM shots determined the acceleration
factor of the sequence.
Inspired by the
iGRASP algorithm6, we utilized the sparsity of harmonic motion. The
acquired MRE data was rearranged and concatenated through the time axis to form
a pseudo continuous wave (Figure 2). Images were reconstructed by solving
$$\rm{arg}\min_x\|\bf{F}_\mit{u} \bf{Sx-y}\|\rm{_2^2} +\mit{λ}_\rm{1}\|\bf{F}^\mit{t} \rm{(}\bf{x - η\rm{)}}\|_\rm{1}+ λ_2\|\bf{TV}_\mit{hm} \rm{(}\bf{x-η}\rm{)}\|_\rm{1}$$
where $$$\bf{x}$$$ is a set of chronologically arranged images to
be reconstructed, $$$\bf{y}$$$ is the acquired multi-coil k-space data, $$$\bf{F}_\mit{u}$$$ is the under-sampling scheme with a radial
sampling pattern, $$$\mit{λ}_\rm{1}$$$ and $$$\mit{λ}_\rm{2}$$$ are the weighting ratios, $$$\bf{S}$$$ and
$$$\bf{η}$$$ are the sensitivity maps and background noise,
respectively. $$$\bf{F}^\mit{t}$$$ represents the temporal FFT, $$$\bf{TV}_\mit{hm}$$$ is a modified temporal TV transform especially for harmonic motion
data, which can be described as:
$$\bf{TV}_\mit{hm} \bf{(x)} = \begin{cases}\sum\limits_{\mit{i}}\bf{x}_\mit{i}-\overline{\bf{x}_\mit{i-t}}, & \mit{i-t} > \rm{0}\\\sum\limits_{\mit{i}}\bf{x}_\mit{i}-\overline{\bf{x}_\mit{i+T-t}}, & otherwise\end{cases}$$
where $$$\mit{T}$$$ is the total number of phase images, and $$$\mit{t}$$$ denotes the sampling point interval
representing one-half period.
MRE images were acquired
from gel phantoms and healthy volunteers. Results were compared with that from
GRE and EPI based MRE using a 3T MRI scanner (uMR 790, United Imaging
Healthcare, Shanghai, China). Stiffness was estimated using a local frequency
estimation (LFE) algorithm7,8. The proposed reconstruction results were compared with
those from MCNUFFT and iGRASP.
Results and Discussion
For
the gel phantom with two inclusions, the
recorded wavelength in the stiffer
inclusion was longer (Figure
3). The MRD-MRE sequence
performed better in the encoding
accuracy, especially for
low frequency actuation. For brain imaging, similar wave images were acquired from MRD-MRE. In addition, an acceleration
factor of 4 could be achieved (25s vs. 104s).
A comparison of the reconstruction
results showed the proposed reconstruction algorithm had better performance
than MCNUFFT and iGRASP, with fewer artifacts of the reconstructed waveforms
(Figure 5). The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structure similarity
index (SSIM) showed the proposed method had the best performance with different
acceleration factors (R = 2, 4, 8). The acceleration up to 4 folds showed
satisfactory PSNR and SSIM values.Conclusion
In
this study, we proposed an MRD-MRE sequence with a harmonic motion based
compressed sensing for accelerated MRE. With the modified TV transform and
temporal FFT, reconstruction utilizing the sparsity of harmonic motion and
compressed sensing showed the potential of further acceleration. Both the phantom
and brain imaging showed the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method.Acknowledgements
Funding
support from grant 31870941 from National Natural Science Foundation of China
(NSFC) and grant 1944190700 from Shanghai Science and Technology Committee
(STCSM) are acknowledged.References
1. Murphy
MC, Huston J, 3rd, Ehman RL. MR elastography of the brain and its application
in neurological diseases. Neuroimage. 2019;187:176-183.
2. Johnson
CL, Holtrop JL, McGarry MD, et al. 3D multislab, multishot acquisition for
fast, whole-brain MR elastography with high signal-to-noise efficiency. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(2):477-485.
3. Bertalan
G, Guo J, Tzschatzsch H, et al. Fast tomoelastography of the mouse brain by
multifrequency single-shot MR elastography. Magn
Reson Med. 2019;81(4):2676-2687.
4. Malis
V, Sinha U, Sinha S. Compressed sensing velocity encoded phase contrast
imaging: Monitoring skeletal muscle kinematics. Magn Reson Med. 2020;84(1):142-156.
5. Strasser
J, Haindl MT, Stollberger R, Fazekas F, Ropele S. Magnetic resonance
elastography of the human brain using a multiphase DENSE acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81(6):3578-3587.
6. Feng
L, Grimm R, Block KT, et al. Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI:
combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial
sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72(3):707-717.
7. Knutsson
H, Westin CF, Granlund G. Local multiscale frequency and bandwidth estimation.
Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing; 1994.
8. Manduca A, Oliphant TE, Dresner MA, et al. Magnetic resonance
elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Medical Image Analysis. 2001;5(4):237-254.