Chien-Yi Liao1, Cheng-Chia Lee2,3,4, Huai-Che Yang2,3, Wen-Yuh Chung2,3, Hsiu-Mei Wu3,5, Wan-Yuo Guo3,5, Ren-Shyan Liu1,6,7, and Chia-Feng Lu1,8
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 2Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 4Brain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 5Department of Radiology, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 6Department of Medical Imaging, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 7Molecular and Genetic Imaging Core, Taiwan Animal Consortium, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 8Institute of Biophotonics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan
Synopsis
Patients with non-small cell lung cancer have a high probability to develop
brain metastasis during the course of the disease. The prediction of treatment
response after Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKRS) can benefit patient
management. In addition to the clinically available information (Karnofsky performance
status, number of tumors, tumor volume, and primary tumor control), we proposed
an MR radiomics approach to provide added values to predict the local tumor
control after GKRS. We suggested that imaging characteristics extracted from preradiosurgical
MRIs combined with clinical information can effectively predict local tumor control.
Background and Purpose
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of lung
cancer and has a high mortality rate. About a half of patients with metastatic
NSCLC would have brain metastasis (BM) during the course of disease [1, 2]. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is one of the first-line
treatments for BM [3]. The prediction of treatment outcome, such as the local tumor
control of BM after GKRS, may improve patient management. However, the prediction
efficacy of local tumor control solely based on the clinically available
information is unsatisfactory. In this study, we proposed a machine learning
approach based on the preradiosurgical MRI radiomics and clinical information to
improve the prediction performance of local tumor control following GKRS.Materials and Methods
We retrospectively collected data of 307 patients with overall 1053
BMs originated from NSCLC. All the patients received GKRS treatment. Inclusion
criteria included: 1) pathological diagnosis of NSCLC by lung biopsy or
surgery; 2) diagnosis of brain metastases confirmed by MRI; 3) patients treated
by GKRS; and 4) available clinical and MRI follow-up after GKRS. The clinical
characteristics of recruited patients and BMs are listed in Table 1. Finally, the 976 of all BMs with
complete clinical information were included for the subsequent analyses.
MRI data were collected from all
the patients, including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c), T1-weighted (T1w),
and T2-weighted (T2w) images. Several image processing steps on the MRIs were
applied to improve the reliability of radiomics analysis. The adjustment of
image resolution was performed to resample voxel size to 1 x 1 x 1 mm3
for each MRI modality. The T2w and T1w images were then registered to T1c
images using a six-parameter rigid body transformation and mutual information
algorithm. Five clinical features (Karnofsky
performance status, KPS; existence of other metastasis besides BM; therapeutic
effect of NSCLC; number of BMs; volume of BMs) were also collected in this
study.
The BM region of interest (ROI) was defined by radiation oncologists
and reviewed by a neuro-radiologist for the GKRS treatment planning based on
T1c enhancement. Overall 1763 3D-radiomic features, including histogram, geometric,
and texture analyses, were extracted from each ROI of BMs. The diagram of image
processing is displayed in Fig. 1.
A two-step feature selection based on the 70% of lesions (training
set) was applied to identify key radiomic features for model training. We first conducted a two-sample t-test to identify the radiomic
features with significant differences between groups (tumor progression vs.
stable) followed by the sequential forward selection algorithm to sieve out the
final radiomic features. Support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were
separately trained for three feature set, including 1) clinical features, 2) selected
radiomic features, and 3) combination of clinical and selected radiomic
features. An under-sampling method (NearMiss-2) was used to match the sample
number of majority class (821 stable BMs) with the minority class (155 progression
BMs) [4]. The model performance was evaluated based on the remaining 30% of
lesions (test set). Results
Twenty-five radiomic features exhibited significant differences
(p<0.05) between tumor progression and stable groups, including 7 gray-level
co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and 18 gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLRLM)
texture features while 8 features extracted from T1w, 8 from T1c, and 9 from
T2w images. Seven final
radiomic features were further selected from 25 features using SFS algorism,
including 4 GLCM and 3 GLRLM texture features for the prediction of local tumor
control after GKRS. Table 2 shows
the final radiomic features and the feature values for the tumor stable and
progression groups. Figure 2a and 2b demonstrate two representative BM cases
(one is stable and another is progressive) with similar tumor size and the
corresponding SVM scores. The SVM model based on the combination of clinical
and radiomic features achieved the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92,
with a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 80% and an accuracy of 85% (Figure 2c). The combination of clinical
and radiomic features showed superior performance compared to the models based
on either radiomic features or clinical features alone. Figure 3 shows the SVM scores of local tumor control classifier derived
based on clinical and radiomic features for each patient in the test set. A
positive SVM score will be classified as the stable tumor after GKRS, and a
negative score will be classified as the tumor progression after GKRS. As shown
in Figure 3, most patients with
stable tumors have the positive scores, and most patients with tumor
progression have the negative scores.Conclusions
Based on the results in this
study, we suggested that the machine learning model based
on radiomics and clinical information could improve the performance in
predicting the local tumor control of BMs after GKRS. For the patients with a
prediction of tumor progression after GKRS, salvage radiotherapy or alternative
treatments can be considered and applied to improve patient outcome.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 109-2314-B-010-022-MY3) and
the National Yang-Ming University (VGHUST110-G7-2-2).References
1. Merchut, M.P., Brain metastases from undiagnosed systemic neoplasms. Archives of
internal medicine, 1989. 149(5): p.
1076-1080.
2. Sørensen, J., et
al., Brain metastases in adenocarcinoma
of the lung: frequency, risk groups, and prognosis. Journal of Clinical
Oncology, 1988. 6(9): p. 1474-1480.
3. Serizawa, T., et
al., Gamma knife radiosurgery for
metastatic brain tumors from lung cancer: a comparison between small cell and
non—small cell carcinoma. Journal of neurosurgery, 2002. 97(Supplement 5): p. 484-488.
4. Mani, I. and I.
Zhang. kNN approach to unbalanced data
distributions: a case study involving information extraction. in Proceedings of workshop on learning from
imbalanced datasets. 2003.