Chengxiu Zhang1, Jingyu Zhong2, Yangfan Hu3, Jing Zhang1, Liping Si2, Yue Xing2, Jia Geng3, Qiong Jiao4, Huizhen Zhang4, Weiwu Yao2, and Guang Yang1
1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, 2Department of Imaging, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China, 3Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China, 4Department of Pathology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Osteosarcoma is
the most common malignant osseous tumor and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for
osteosarcoma has significantly improved survival outcomes. However, not all
patients benefit from the current treatment strategy. We constructed a nomogram
combined radiomics features from routinely available T2WI images and clinical
variables to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The nomogram
achieved an AUC of 0.838 (95% CI, 0.700-0.958) and DCA suggested that it has the
potential to be used for preoperational prediction of pathological NAC response
in osteosarcoma patients.
INTRODUCTION
Osteosarcoma
is the most common malignant osseous tumor with two incidence peaks in children
and adolescents, and in elders over 60 years 1. Nowadays, a
conventional approach for osteosarcoma has significantly improved survival
outcomes of osteosarcoma patients. However, not all patients benefit from the
current treatment strategy. The purpose of our study was to develop and
evaluate a radiomics model integrated the T2WI-based radiomics score and
clinical variables to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in
patients with osteosarcoma.METHODS
The workflow of
this study is illustrated in Figure 1, which includes data inclusion and
exclusion process and the radiomics workflow.
Data: 144 osteosarcoma patients with average age of 17 years
treated by NAC were included in this study. 36 (25.0%) patients were
pathological good responders (pGR) to NAC, while 108
(75.0%) were
non-pGR. They were split randomly into training (n = 101) and test (n = 43)
datasets. The same datasets were used for the building and evaluation of all
models, including clinical, radiomics, and combined model. Lesions were
segmented on preoperative T2WI images by two radiologists independently.
Clinical Model: 21 clinical features with significant
difference between pGR and non-pGR groups were selected using Relief algorithm,
and 8 variables were retained in the final LR model.
Radiomics Model: We used open source software
FeatureExplorer2 for feature extraction and model building. Shape, first order, and texture
features were extracted from original images, Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG,
sigma=1.0, 3.0, and 5.0) filtered and wavelet transformed images. Altogether,
702 features were extracted and used in radiomics model building. For feature
selection, each classes of features from each type of the base image were used
to build a scout model. The hyper-parameters of the scout models were tuned
with 5-fold cross-validation using training dataset. The features retained in
the scout models were used for the building of the final radiomics model.
For the modeling
of the final radiomics model, dimension reduction was done with Pearson
correlation coefficient after normalization. Feature selection was performed in
the training dataset by 10-fold cross-validation after data balancing with upsampling.
Combined Model: The output radiomics score of the
radiomics was merged with features retained in the clinical model to build the combined
model.
Evaluation: Area under ROC curve (AUC), predicted
probability plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate
the model performance and illustrate the nomogram utility. Confidence interval
(CI) of AUCs were obtained by bootstrapping.RESULTS
The results of
the three models are listed in Table 1. The clinical and radiomics model achieved
AUCs of 0.628 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.404-0.857) and 0.810 (95% CI,
0.628-0.951) in the test dataset, respectively. Radiomics features contributing
to the radiomics score are listed in Table 2, together with their corresponding
weights. The clinical-radiomics nomogram combined radiomics score and clinical
variables is shown in Figure
2, together with its ROC curve, prediction probability plot, and DCA curve. The
nomogram demonstrated a good discrimination performance, with an AUC of
0.838 (95% CI, 0.700-0.958), better than the clinical or the radiomics model
alone. The DCA suggested clinical utility of nomogram.DISCUSSION
The model
combined radiomics score and clinical variables achieved the best performance
in our study, which means radiomics features can be combined with clinical
variables to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response more effectively. Our
prediction models only relied on routinely collected raw care data, so they
were more readily implementable in clinical environment.
One shape feature
representing tumor size was retained in the radiomics model, which has been
demonstrated to be related to NAC response 3. Two kurtosis measures were found to be
negatively correlated with probability of pGR, which might reflect the higher
necrosis rate and lower heterogeneity of treated osteosarcoma, since higher
kurtosis measures were thought to represent increased heterogeneity 4. The five texture features
retained in the radiomics model also implied the importance of heterogeneity to
the NAC response.
To our knowledge,
this study was the first to utilize T2WI-based radiomics features and objective
clinical variables to build a nomogram to predict NAC response of osteosarcoma
patients preoperatively. There have been some radiomics studies in NAC response
prediction with PET, CT, and advanced MRI sequences 5-8 previously. However, these images
might not always be available in clinical settings. Delta-radiomics based on CT
scans 5 require
multiple time-point imaging data before and after NAC, which were hard to
acquire for transferred patients. Contrast-enhanced MRI 6,7 presented excellent results, but they
might not be accessible for fragile patients or for those with contrast agent
allergy. PET showed certain predictive effects 8, but the cost of PET is high. Since MRI is an
indispensable preoperational imaging procedure and our model only uses
radiomics features from routine T2WI image, it will be much easier to be used
in clinical settings.CONCLUSION
The
nomogram developed with radiomics based on conventional MRI sequence and
objective clinical variables relied on routinely collected raw care data, has a
potential of becoming a noninvasive, less human-dependent tool for
preoperational prediction of pathological NAC response in osteosarcoma patients.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. World
Health Organization classification of tumors: WHO classification of tumours of
soft tissue and bone, 5th edn. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, IARC
Press, Lyon, 2020.
2. Song Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, et al. FeAture
Explorer (FAE): A tool of Model Development for Radiomics. Plos One. 2020; 15(8):e0237587.
3. Zhao S, Su Y, Duan J, et al. Radiomics signature
extracted from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predicts outcomes
in osteosarcoma. J Bone Oncol. 2019;100263.
4. Davnall F, Yip CS, Ljungqvist G, et al. Assessment of
tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice. Insights
Imaging. 2012; 3(6):573-589.
5. Lin P, Yang PF, Chen S, et al. A delta-radiomics model
for preoperative evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in high-grade
osteosarcoma. Cancer Imaging. 2020; 20(1):7.
6. Kayal EB, Kandasamy D, Khare K, et al. Intravoxel
incoherent motion (IVIM) for response assessment in patients with osteosarcoma
undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Radiol 119 (2019): 108635.
7. Lee SK, Jee WH, Jung CK, et al. Prediction of poor responders
to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma: additive value of
diffusion-weighted MRI including volumetric analysis to standard MRI at 3T.
PLoS One. 2020; 15(3):e0229983.
8. Song H, Jiao Y, Wei W, et al. Can pretreatment
18-F-FDG PET tumor texture features predict the outcomes of osteosarcoma
treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(7):3945–3954.