Rebecca Glarin1,2, Yasmin Blunck1, and Bradford Moffat1
1MBCIU, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia, 2Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Synopsis
Functional MRI is a dominant tool in both neuroscience research and neurosurgical planning. Multiband EPI can not be ignored as a staple acquisition tool for fMRI. It has the ability to assist in improving temporal resolution, spatial resolution and signal to noise. When using this highly effective and efficient technique there are considerations in order to gain the most for the sequence without producing detrimental imaging artefacts. Once the technique is understood there is a future application of Multiecho Multiband EPI which can potentially be used with great success to increase sensitivity and specificity of BOLD signal and fMRI.
Background
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
uses Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) to measure Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD)
response in the brain to neural activity. The research applications are wide
and varied, particularly for cognitive neuroscientists, however fMRI is also
increasingly used in clinical practice for improved neurosurgical planning.
The acquisition of this data has been somewhat
and modestly optimised over the years as field strengths increased, and RF and
gradient technology improved. More
recently Multiband (MB) MRI, also known as Simultaneous Multi Slice (SMS), has allowed
for multiple slice locations to be excited simultaneously. The use of this technique in conjunction with
EPI and multi-channel receive coil reconstruction techniques has led to a
dramatic improvement in fMRI, including increased spatial (< 1mm isotropic)
and temporal resolution (TR<1s), while maintaining whole brain coverage at
7T [1, 2]. It has also allowed for the
introduction of Multi-Echo fMRI which can be a successful way to increase the BOLD
signal and contrast in small sub-cortical brain structures.
Teaching Point
1. The addition of SMS to EPI means whole brain coverage can
be achieved with sub millimetre slices and sub second temporal resolution for
fMRI at 7T.
Whilst the brain is exposed to a task there
are changes in the blood flow in capillaries of the cortex . BOLD imaging uses the susceptibility difference
oxyhaemoglobin and deoxyhaemoglobin to quantify brain activation. Timing of the
acquisition is vital in imaging these changes in blood flow and with this
requirement comes the consideration of TR (which dictates temporal resolution),
voxel size (spatial resolution) and TE (contrast) [3, 4]. Correct TE selection
is vital as the BOLD effect relies on T2* weighting differences between deoxyhaemoglobin
and oxyhaemoglobin. This T2* effect increases with the increase in magnetic
field leading to significant increases in BOLD contrast at ultra-high fields
(7T or higher) [5] (Fig 1). This together with the increase in MRI signal to
noise ratio (SNR) at 7T means there is the possibility to explore improved spatial
and temporal resolution to sub millimetre, sub second (Fig 2). However, with
thinner slices, associated with higher resolution images, whole brain coverage
becomes a major issue. The introduction of multiband has made more coverage
possible.
The Good- Multiband
imaging uses composite RF pulses to simultaneously excite multiple slice
locations through the use of slice selective gradients [6]. The MB factor
determines how many slices are acquired within one TR. A high MB factor can
increase the coverage or inversely allow a reduced TR to improve temporal
resolution [7]. One advantage is that because thinner slices can be achieved
there is less through slice dephasing which appears as signal dropout in the
frontal and hippocampus areas using traditional fMRI [8] (Fig 2). These
advantages of whole brain coverage with higher spatial and temporal resolution
through the acquisition with multiband can be seen in a comparison of whole brain
imaging at 3T and 7T (Fig 3).
The Bad –
Using multiband doesn’t come without challenges. Both artefacts and
significantly reduced SNR can be produced if the MB factor is too high [9]. This
occurs when the simultaneously excited slices become too close together and the
receive coil array fails to adequately separate the signals. When stacked
slices are viewed from the perpendicular plane one sees significant slice
banding (Fig 5a).
2.
Adding multiple
echoes to the MB-EPI sequence further increases fMRI signal and contrast.
The Future -
As we move forward with fMRI and the improvements of BOLD imaging with MB we
have seen the introduction of Multi Echo fMRI. Recently ME fMRI has moved from
a technique being itself researched to both a research and potentially clinical
technique. It involves the acquisition of multiple echoes within one TR on
simultaneously excited slices [7]. This technique has potential to dramatically
improve fMRI for two reasons: 1. The sum of the echoes increases SNR. 2. Optimal
BOLD contrast is when the TE = T2*, therefore multiple TE’s will increase BOLD
contrast [10]. Since different gray
matter structures have a different T2* (particularly sub cortical) there are
more chances of capturing the highest BOLD contrast from as many tissues as
possible (Fig 4). The combination of the signals across the multiple TEs can
then produce a higher sensitivity than a single TE fMRI [10]. This is supported
in cases where there is signal dropout from susceptibility artefact in one TE
but not in another. (Fig 5b.) It can also mean activation in subcortical layers
can be separated by the different activation times for increased specificity [11].
Summary
The addition of MB to EPI means that higher
temporal and spatially resolved fMRI can be realised without compromise of
spatial coverage. In addition, combining this with a multi-echo readout can
further increase the BOLD contrast, particularly for sub-cortical grey matter structures,
increasing the sensitivity and specificity. This can be of great assistance to
fMRI and the advancement to applied neuroscience and clinical neuroscience
research. In principle, the MB technique can work for any slice selective
sequences and as such the technology could be used to decrease slice
thicknesses without compromise of coverage for a whole range of applications.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the facilities, and the scientific
and technical assistance of the Australian National Imaging Facility, a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure
Strategy (NCRIS) capability, at the Melbourne Brain Centre Imaging Unit of the
University of Melbourne. The work was also supported by a research
collaboration agreement with Siemens Healthineers. Acknowledgment also to Centre
for Magnetic Resonance Research, Minnesota for the development and supply of
the Multiband EPI sequence required for this project.References
1. Benedikt A, Poser B, Setsompop K. Pulse
sequences and parallel imaging for high spatiotemporal resolution MRI at
ultra-high field. NeuroImage, Volume 168, March 2018,
Pages 101-118
2. Feinberg
DA, Yacoub E. The rapid development of high speed, resolution and precision in
fMRI. Neuroimage Volume 62, 2012. Pages 720–725.
3. Demetriou
L, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of increasing temporal resolution with
multiband-accelerated protocols and effects on statistical outcome measures in
fMRI. NeuroImage., Volume 176, 2018, Pages 404–416
4. Menon RS,
et al. BOLD based functional MRI at 4 T includes a capillary bed contribution:
echo planar imaging correlates with previous optical imaging using intrinsic
signals. Magn. Reson. Med. Volume 33, 1995. Pages 453–459.
5. Moeller S,
et al. Multiband multislice GE-EPI at 7 tesla, with 16-fold acceleration using
partial parallel imaging with application to high spatial and temporal
whole-brain FMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. Volume 63, 2010. Pages 1144–1153.
6. Barth M,
Breuer F, Koopmans PJ, Norris DG, Poser B. Simultaneous multislice (SMS)
imaging techniques. Magn. Reson. Med. Volume 75, 2015. 63–81.
7. Boyacioglu
R, Schulz J, Koopmans PJ, Barth M, Norris DG. Improved sensitivity and
specificity for resting state and task fMRI with multiband multi-echo EPI
compared to multi-echo EPI at 7T. Neuroimage, Volume 119, 2015, Pages 352–361.
8. Risk B,
Kociuba MC, Rowe D. Impacts of simultaneous multislice acquisition on
sensitivity and specificity in fMRI. NeuroImage, Volume 172, 2018, Pages
538–553.
9. Chen L , et al. Evaluation of highly accelerated
simultaneous multi-slice EPI for fMRI. NeuroImage, Volume 104, 2015, Pages
452–459
10. Puckett
AM, Bollman S, Benedikt A, Palmer
J, Barth M, Cunnington R. Using multi-echo simultaneous multi-slice
(SMS) EPI to improve functional MRI of the subcortical nuclei of the basal
ganglia at ultra-high field (7T). Neuroimage, Volume 172, 2018, Pages 886-895.
11. Poser BA, Norris DG. Investigating the benefits
of multi-echo EPI for fMRI at 7T. Neuroimage, Volume 45, 2009. Pages 1162–1172.