Synopsis
RF pulses are essential for every MR experiment and an
important tool to manipulate the magnetization during the experiment. Important
parameters of an RF pulse are the complex envelope, the duration, and the peak
transmitter voltage that define the pulse’s energy, the frequency spectrum, and
flip angle. Depending on the purpose of the RF, the desired properties, and the
boundary conditions, different RF pulse envelopes may be advantageous. In this
presentation, the principles and basic properties of adiabatic,
spatial-spectral, and multi-dimensional RF pulses will be covered with the
latter being feasible to realize tailored measurement volumes in MRS.
TARGET AUDIENCE
Scientists interested in understanding adiabatic, spatial-spectral, and
spatially multi-dimensional RF pulses.OBJECTIVES
Participants should (i) be aware
of basic properties and types of RF pulses, (ii) know approaches for RF
pulse design, (iii) understand the principles and basic properties of adiabatic, spatial-spectral, and spatially multi-dimensional RF pulses, and (iv) see how
the latter could help to realize tailored measurement volumes in MRS.CONTENT
RF pulses are essential for every MR experiment
because they are required to generate transverse magnetization, the source of
the acquired signal. Furthermore, they are an important tool to manipulate the magnetization
during the experiment, e.g. by reducing the dephasing effect of field
inhomogeneities (refocussing), selecting or saturating contributions with
a particular chemical shift (spectral editing, water suppression) or at
certain spatial positions (slice selection, regional saturation), or enhancing
relaxation effects (inversion recovery).
Important parameters of an RF pulse are the complex
envelope, usually expressed as magnitude and phase or frequency as a function
of time, the duration, and the peak transmitter voltage that define the pulse
properties, the most relevant being the energy, the frequency spectrum, often
characterized by the bandwidth, and the flip angle which, in general, may vary
across the frequency spectrum.
Depending on the purpose of the RF
pulse (excitation, saturation, inversion or refocussing), the desired properties,
e.g. pulse duration, bandwidth and flip angle, and the boundary conditions,
.e.g. maximum transmitter voltage, different RF pulse envelopes may be advantageous.
However, to find the best RF pulse envelope for a particular purpose is usually
not straightforward, mainly because the desired RF pulse features may require
conflicting properties, the Bloch equations cannot be solved analytically for
most problems, and physical effects like relaxation and technical or
experimental imperfections like inhomogeneities of the transmit RF
field (B1) may degrade the RF pulse performance significantly. These
issues have led to the development of methods and tools for RF pulse design and
a variety of RF pulse types and envelopes of which a few will be considered in
more detail: (i) RF solutions for B1 inhomogeneities, composite
and adiabatic RF pulses, (ii) spatial-spectral RF pulses that combine
spatial and spectral selectivity, and (iii) spatially multi-dimensional RF
pulses that could be used for tailored MRS measurement volumes.
For standard RF pulses the flip angle depends on the B1
peak amplitude that may vary across the target region, in particular at higher
field strengths or when using surface coils for RF transmission. Such inhomogeneities
reduce the signal intensity or saturation and labelling efficiency which can
hamper applications considerably. To ameliorate these effects, composite RF
pulses can be used that consist of several RF sub-pulses with different flip
angles and phases. In total, they have the same flip angle as a standard,
single RF pulse for an ideal B1 field but if the B1 amplitude deviates
the flip angle differences of the sub-pulses partially compensate yielding a
flip angle much closer to the desired one than for a single RF pulse. A
prominent example is the 90°x-180°y-90°x
composite RF pulses for the inversion of longitudinal magnetization.
More elaborated are frequency-modulated RF pulses that
provide a fixed flip angle for any B1 peak amplitude exceeding a
certain threshold. These so-called adiabatic RF pulses use a variable frequency
to obtain an effective flux density in the rotating frame that changes its
orientation during the RF pulse, e.g. from longitudinal to transverse, and can
“guide” the magnetization parallel to it to the desired orientation. This
requires appropriate frequency and amplitude modulation functions and a
sufficiently slow change of the effective flux density (adiabatic condition).
While adiabatic 90°-excitation and 180°-inversion pulses are rather easy to realize,
adiabatic refocussing RF pulses and excitation pulses with arbitrary flip angles
are more complex and a composite of basic adiabatic RF pulses.
Spatial-spectral RF pulses that combine spatial and
spectral selectivity, are usually composite RF pulses that consist of equidistant,
slice-selective RF excitations with different flip angles. Thereby, the temporal
distance of the pulses defines the spectral “pass” and “stop” bands: for a
phase shift of an even multiple of 180° during the temporal distance, the flip
direction is identical for all sub-pulses and their flip angles “add up” to the
desired flip angle; for phase shifts that are an odd multiple of 180°, the flip
directions alternate between sub-pulses yielding an effective flip angle of 0°
if the relative flip angles are chosen according to binomial coefficients. Thus,
spectral-spatial RF pulses can be used to excite or saturate water or fat/lipids
slice-selective.
The basics of spatially multi-dimensional RF pulses can
be sketched when considering the small-flip-angle approximation of the Bloch
equations and the so-called excitation K-space: in this case the spatial
excitation profile is the Fourier transform of the product of B1 as
a function of K, scaled with the K-space velocity, and the sampling
function that defines the gradient trajectory in K-space. This means, for
instance, that an appropriate B1 envelope applied along a 2D, e.g.
spiral or blipped-planar, trajectory can excite arbitrarily shaped,
two-dimensional profiles which could be used to adapt the MRS measurement
volume to the specific shape of the target volume, e.g. to minimize partial
volume effects. Thereby, side excitation, periodic copies of the desired
excitation profile, occur in the direction of discrete sampling (radial for
spiral, blip direction for blipped-planar trajectories) and must be suppressed
or positioned outside of the object to avoid unwanted signal contributions.
To
achieve a good profile sharpness with such multi-dimensional RF pulses, long trajectories are needed yielding RF
pulses with a low bandwidth that are sensitive to frequency offsets like
chemical shifts which is a significant problem for MRS applications. However,
these effect can be ameliorated or avoided by shorting the effective RF pulseduration, e.g. with parallel transmission technqiues or segmentation,
i.e. applying only a segment of the trajectory in each shot and averaging the
complex signals obtained for all segments, and/or applying intermediate refocussing RF
pulses that avoid the accumulation of phase evolutions along the full RF pulse or
the applied segment.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
Overview
1. de
Graaf RA, “Radiofrequency Pulses”, in:
de Graaf RA, “In Vivo NMR Spectroscopy”, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2007
RF Pulse
Design Methods
2. Pauly
J et al., J Magn Reson 81, 43 (1989)
3. Conolly
S et al., IEEE Trans Med Imaging 5, 106 (1986)
4. Rund
A et al., IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37, 461 (2018)
5. Shinnar
M et al., Magn Reson Med 12, 74 / 81 / 88 / 93 (1989)
6. Pauly
J et al., IEEE Trans Med Imaging 10, 53 (1991)
7. Geen
H et al., J Magn Reson 93, 93 (1991)
8. Lee
KJ et al., J Magn Reson 182, 133 (2006)
9. Issa
B, J Magn Reson 198, 152 (2009)
10. Grissom
WA et al., J Magn Reson 242, 189 (2014)
11. Gezelter
JD et al., J Magn Reson 90, 397 (1990)
12. Vinding
MS et al., Magn Reson Med 82, 586 (2019)
Composite
RF Pulses
13. Levitt
MH et al., J Magn Reson 48, 234 (1982)
14. Levitt
MH, Prog. NMR Spectrosc 18, 61 (1986)
15. Moore
J et al., J Magn Reson 205, 50 (2010)
16. Tse
DHY et al, Magn Reson Med 78, 1883 (2017)
Adiabatic
RF Pulses
17. de
Graaf RA et al., Concepts Magn Reson 9, 247 (1997)
18. Silver
MS et al., J Magn Reson 59, 347 (1984)
19. Silver
MS et al., Phys Rev A 31, 2753 (1985)
20. Bendall
MR et al., J Magn Reson 72, 177 (1987)
21. Bendall MR et al., Magn Reson Med 4, 439 (1988)
22. Ugurbil
K et al., J Magn Reson 78, 472 (1988)
23. Staewen
RS et al., Invest Radiol 25, 559 (1990)
24. de
Graaf RA et al., Magn Reson Med 35, 652
(1996)
Spatial-Spectral
RF Pulse
25. Meyer
CH et al., Magn Reson Med 15, 287 (1990)
26. Spielman
D et al., Magn Reson Med 18, 269 (1991)
27. Williams
SN et al., Magn Reson Med 79, 1377 (2018)
Multi-Dimensional
RF Pulses
28. Bottomley
PA et al., J Appl Phys 62, 4284 (1987)
29. Pauly
J et al., J Magn Reson 82, 571 (1989)
30. Hardy
CJ et al., J Magn Reson 87, 639 (1990)
31. Panych
LP et al., Magn Reson Med 41, 224 (1999)
32. Qin
Q et al., Magn Reson Med 58, 19 (2007)
33. Zelinski
AC et al., IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27, 1213 (2008)
34. Grissom
WA et al., IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28, 1548 (2009)
35. Weber-Fahr
et al., Magn Reson Imaging 27, 664 (2009)
36. Busch
MG et al., Magn Reson Med 66, 1218 (2011)
37. Busch
MG et al., Magn Reson Med 68, 1383 (2012)
38. Finsterbusch
J et al., Magn Reson Med 70, 1491 (2013)
39. Zheng
H et al., J Magn Reson 228, 37 (2013)
40. Davids
M et al., Magn Reson Med 76, 1170 (2016)