Patricia Figueiredo1 and Michael Chappell2,3
1ISR-Lisboa/LARSyS and Department of Bioengineering, ISR-Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 2Institute of Biomedical Engineering & Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3Beacon of Excellence in Precision Imaging & Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottigham, United Kingdom
Synopsis
This session aims to provide a concise but
comprehensive overview of models of arterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion
signals. The basic principles of ASL perfusion imaging based on tracer kinetics
will be presented, and common ASL modelling scenarios will be described focusing
on perfusion quantification as well as on the exploration of other available
haemodynamic information. The session will be organized in three parts, each consisting of a description
of the theory underpinning a specific modelling approach, followed by a step-by-step hands-on demonstration of its practical application on real datasets
using a freely available tool.
Target audience
Researchers who
want to get started with ASL perfusion signal modelling; clinicians and basic
scientists interested in quantifying perfusion and other haemodynamic
parameters from ASL data.Objectives / outcomes
To provide a concise but comprehensive overview of models of ASL
perfusion signals, together with step-by-step live demonstrations of common ASL
modelling scenarios focusing on perfusion quantification and exploring what
other haemodynamic information is available using ASL.
By attending this course, participants
should be able to:
- Describe the standard tracer-kinetic
models of ASL perfusion signals, including their main assumptions and
limitations, and be familiar with advanced models (including a macrovascular
compartment, partial volume estimation, bolus dispersion, or restricted water
exchange);
- Describe how ASL modelling can be used
to quantify perfusion as well as other haemodynamic parameters (including
arterial transit time or arterial blood volume);
- Undertake simple kinetic modelling tasks on real ASL datasets, including
the main data analysis steps leading to the quantification of perfusion and
other haemodynamic parameters, using freely available tools.Overview
The session will be organized in three parts, each consisting of a description
of underpinning theory introducing a specific modelling approach, followed by a
hands-on demonstration illustrating its practical application on real datasets
using the freely available tool BASIL, part of the FMRIB Software Library (FSL)
(https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/BASIL). The three parts will cover the
following theoretical topics and hands-on demonstrations:
Theory 1
Following
the definition of perfusion, the basic principles of perfusion imaging based on
tracer kinetics will be presented, including the concepts of arterial input
function (AIF) and tissue residue function. The basic principles underlying
ASL perfusion imaging will then be introduced, by describing how an endogenous
perfusion tracer can be created through the inversion of the magnetisation of
arterial blood water spins. The main labelling strategies of pulsed ASL (PASL)
and continuous and pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) will be presented, as well as
the associated timing parameters inversion time (TI) and post-labelling delay
(PLD), respectively. The main issues regarding the acquisition of ASL data,
consisting of both label and control images for subsequent subtraction, will be
discussed, including background suppression, readout schemes, and signal
averaging.
The
standard kinetic model that is most commonly used to explain ASL perfusion
signals will be described, including: the boxcar AIF resulting from the
assumption of no label dispersion, and associated parameters of labelling
efficiency, label duration, and arterial transit time (ATT); and the single,
well-mixed compartment residue function resulting from the assumption that
water is a freely diffusible tracer, and associated parameters blood-tissue
partition coefficient of water and apparent tissue T1. The kinetic curves
obtained for both the PASL and pCASL labelling methods will then be presented,
highlighting their sensitivity to perfusion as well as the ATT.
Perfusion
quantification based on single-delay (TI/PLD) ASL measurements will be
described (following the ASL consensus paper recommendations), including: the choice
of TI/PLD value, the model inversion equation, and the calibration method for
the estimation of the equilibrium magnetisation of arterial blood.
Hands-on 1
Perfusion quantification
based on the analysis of a single-PLD pCASL dataset will be demonstrated,
following the ASL consensus paper recommendation, including: the main pre-processing
steps; label-control subtraction; standard kinetic model inversion; calibration;
and perfusion quantification.
Theory 2
The
potentially confounding effects of variable, and in particular unexpectedly
long, ATT values will be described, motivating the need for multi-delay ASL
measurements. The main multi-delay sampling approaches will be presented,
including Look-Locker and time-encoded sequences, as well as associated optimal
sampling strategies. Methods for fitting the standard kinetic model to
multi-delay ASL data in order to estimate both perfusion and ATT will be introduced,
and the utility of ATT as a haemodynamic parameter in its own right will be considered.
The contribution
of water spins in arteries and arterioles to the ASL signal, particularly when
measured at short delays, will be discussed. Methods for minimising these macrovascular
signal contributions through the use of flow-suppression gradients will be
described. An extended kinetic model including an additional component
explaining macrovascular signal contributions will then be presented, and how
to quantify the arterial blood volume (aBV), as an extra haemodynamic parameter,
will be described.
Hands-on 2
A multi-PLD
pCASL dataset will be analysed, including fitting of a standard kinetic model with
and without macrovascular signal component. Approaches for non-linear model
fitting will be explored including Bayesian inference with different types of
prior information, for the quantification of perfusion, ATT and aBV. An optimal
multi-delay ASL acquisitions strategy will be generated.
Theory 3
Some advanced
ASL kinetic modelling approaches will be briefly introduced, in order to
illustrate potential future directions in specific situations where the
standard or extend models may not be appropriate. These include: modelling the
AIF in the presence of bolus dispersion, with potentially significant impact on
ATT estimates, when sufficient temporal resolution is available; modelling restricted
water exchange in the residue function, potentially allowing for the
measurement of water permeability; and modelling partial volume effects by
considering multiple model components for the different tissues.
Hands-on 3
A multi-PLD
pCASL dataset will be analysed with the inclusion of dispersion in the kinetic
model to explore the difference this makes to the resulting parameter
estimation. Finally, the process of partial volume correction will be explained
and applied to this data to attempt to separate grey and white matter
perfusion. Software
The following is a non-exhaustive list of software tools available
for the analysis of ASL data:
- The main scanner manufacturers have
in-built tools for basic perfusion-weighted image generation and also for
perfusion quantification; however, more options are generally available if you
export the data and analyse it yourself.
- BASIL, part of the FMRIB
Software Library (FSL) (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/BASIL).
BASIL will be used for the demonstrations in this session.
- ASLtbx, a SPM plugin (https://cfn.upenn.edu/~zewang/ASLtbx.php).
·
- ASAP, a SPM plugin that also
exploits FSL tools (https://sites.google.com/site/asltoolbox/).
- ExploreASL, a Matlab pipeline focused
on large multi-center studies (https://sites.google.com/view/exploreasl).Acknowledgements
Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for financial
support through Grant UID/EEA/50009/2019.References
Books
Buxton R,
Introduction to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principles and
Techniques (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Chappell,
MacIntosh & Okell, Introduction to Perfusion Quantification using Arterial
Spin Labelling. Oxford University Press, 2017.
http://www.neuroimagingprimers.org/ (freely available tutorial exercises for
ASL using BASIL tools available via the website).
Reviews
Alsop D, et
al., Recommended implementation of arterial spin‐labeled perfusion MRI for
clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the
European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 2015; 73(1):102–116.
Jezzard P, et
al., Arterial spin labeling for the measurement of cerebral perfusion and
angiography. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2018; 38(4):603–626.
Papers
Buxton R, et
al., A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial
spin labeling. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 1998; 40(3):383–396.
Chappell MA, et
al., Separation of Macrovascular Signal in Multi-inversion Time Arterial Spin
Labelling MRI. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 2010; 63(5):1357–1365.
Chappell MA, et
al., Partial Volume Correction of Multiple Inversion Time Arterial Spin
Labeling MRI Data. Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine 2011; 65:1173–1183.
Chappell MA, et
al., Modeling Dispersion in Arterial Spin Labeling: Validation Using Dynamic
Angiographic Measurements. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 2013; 69:563–570.
Sousa I, et
al., Reproducibility of the Quantification of Arterial and Tissue Contributions
in Multiple Postlabeling Delay Arterial Spin Labeling. Journal of Magnetic
Resonance Imaging 2014; 40:1453:1462.
Woods et al., A
general framework for optimizing arterial spin labeling MRI experiments. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2018; 81(4):2474-2488.
Pinto J, et
al., Calibration of arterial spin labeling data — potential pitfalls in
post‐processing. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 2020; 83 (4),1222-1234.