Nicholas Senn1, Ehab Husain2, Yazan Masannat3, Sai Man Cheung1, Bernard Siow4, Steven D Heys5, and Jiabao He1
1Aberdeen Biomedical Imaging Centre, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 2Pathology department, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 3Breast Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 4Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom, 5School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Breast cancers often present a
spatially heterogenous response to treatment manifesting as diverse variations
in the underlying distribution of cellularity. We hypothesised that kurtosis
from diffusion q-space imaging provides a higher effect gradient to assess the
amount of entropy and dispersion in breast cancer cellularity than measures of
diffusion displacement. We investigated whole breast tumours
excised from surgery, with imaging performed same day overnight on a clinical 3T MRI system. The
entropy and dispersion obtained from kurtosis were significantly higher than that
obtained from displacement measurements, yielding a higher effect gradient, and
significantly correlated with the histologic cellularity.
Introduction
Response guided neoadjuvant
chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival rate in patients with breast
cancer, with response exhibited at an early stage of treatment 1.
However, tumours often present a spatially heterogenous response to treatment 2,
manifesting as diverse variations in the underlying distribution of
cellularity, which mask accurate radiological assessment of patient response 3.
Recently, diffusion q-space imaging (QSI), mapping the full width at
half maximum of diffusion displacement (FWHM), was shown to provide a more
sensitive assessment of breast tumour cellularity than existing diffusion
imaging methods,
quantifying the asymmetry (skewness) across whole tumour histogram
distributions proposed to reflect the proportion of viable tumour tissue 4. Now, in order to differentiate
heterogeneity response at a personalised care level, a more sensitive QSI
analysis approach is required to discern the fine variations in underlying
cellularity. In this study we hypothesised that kurtosis, measuring the extent
which water diffusion is non-Gaussian 5, provides a higher effect
gradient to assess the amount of entropy and dispersion in breast cancer
cellularity than measures of diffusion displacement.Methods
To probe this hypothesis,
heterogeneity features derived from QSI in twenty freshly excised invasive
carcinoma breast cancers from patients (age range, 35–78 years) were
systematically compared. This study was approved by NHS Research Ethics
Committee and written informed consent was obtained prior to imaging.
The excised whole tumour was
placed in a sealed container filled with 10% buffered formalin solution and
immobilised using a specially designed holding harness 4. Magnetic
resonance imaging was performed using a clinical 3T MRI scanner (Achieva TX,
Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands), using the body coil for uniform
transmission and a 32-channel receiver head coil for high sensitivity signal
detection. QSI was performed using multi-shot pulsed gradient spin echo (PGSE)
sequence with SPIR fat suppression to acquire diffusion weighted images over 3
orthogonal diffusion directions for 32 equidistant q-values from 10.4 to 655 cm-1,
with diffusion times of δ/Δ of 24.9/37.8 ms, field of view of 141×141 mm2,
slice thickness of 2.2 mm, matrix size of 64×64, in plane resolution of 2.2×2.2
mm2, repetition time (TR) of 5900 ms, echo time (TE) of 94 ms, and
7–10 slices depending on tumour size.
Images were analysed using in
house software written in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, USA). Diffusion-weighted
images acquired for each of the 3 orthogonal diffusion gradient directions were
averaged. QSI analysis was performed voxel-wise, to compute the displacement
probability density function (PDF) from the fast Fourier transform of the
diffusion signal mirrored around q-value of 0 cm-1. QSI parameters
were derived from the displacement PDF following spline interpolation. FWHM was
measured as the width (in mm)
of PDF at half peak height, and probability of zero displacement (P0) was
measurement as the maximum height of PDF 6,7. Kurtosis was measured
as the 4th moment of the profile between 50 mm and 50 mm. Normalised histogram distributions of
FWHM, P0 and kurtosis were extracted from regions-of-interest previously drawn
to encompass the whole tumour mass on diffusivity maps, and first order entropy and dispersion (width between
the 10th and 90th histogram percentiles) were extracted. The same procedure was performed to extract heterogeneity
parameters from histologic cellularity histogram distributions 4.
Overall differences
in entropy and dispersion from kurtosis, FWHM, and P0 was examined using Friedman
Test, and post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The relative effect gradient of
the entropy and dispersion values obtained from FWHM and P0 was compared to
values obtained from kurtosis using as the line of best fit gradient and
reported as the percentage difference from gradient slope of 1, for instances
of significant Pearson’s correlation. The correspondence between the
heterogeneity features obtained from QSI and cellularity were examined using
Pearson’s correlation.Results
There was a significant
difference (P<0.0005) between the entropy obtained from kurtosis, P0, and
FWHM (Fig.1). Kurtosis yielded significantly higher entropy 5.11
(4.90 – 5.25), and provided
a higher effect gradient compared to P0, 0.310/0.690 (44.9%) (Fig.2). Contrary
to FWHM, there was significant (P<0.05) linear correlation between the
entropy of cellularity from histology and the entropy from kurtosis (R = 0.541)
and P0 (R = 0.496) (Fig.3).
There was a significant
difference (P<0.0005) between the dispersion obtained from kurtosis, P0, and
FWHM (Fig.1). Kurtosis yielded significantly higher width 23.95 (21.18 – 30.75)
compared to P0 and FWHM, and provided a higher effect gradient (percentage increase)
compared to the width, 0.176/0.824 (21.4%) obtained from P0 (Fig.2). There was
significant (P<0.05) linear correlation between the width obtained from
cellularity and the width from kurtosis (R = 0.596), and P0 (R =
0.544) (Fig.3).Discussion
In this work, we examined
whether kurtosis provides a more sensitive assessment of breast tumour
heterogeneity compared to QSI measures of diffusion displacement in excised
breast cancers on a 3T clinical scanner. We found kurtosis to provide a larger
effect gradient for evaluating entropy and dispersion, as indicators of the
irregularity and spread in underlying cellularity respectively. Furthermore,
all features of tumour heterogeneity extracted from kurtosis showed significant
fidelity to the cellularity heterogeneity from histology.Conclusion
Kurtosis
is the most promising QSI approach to elucidate heterogenous changes to
cellularity in patients exhibiting response to preoperative treatments.Acknowledgements
The
authors would like to thank Dr Matthew Clemence, Philips Healthcare Clinical
Science, UK, for clinical scientist support, Ms Bolanle Brikinns for patient
recruitment support, Mr Gordon Buchan for experiment material support, and Ms
Mairi Fuller for providing access to the patients. NHS Grampian
Endowment Research Grant funds this project and Nicholas Senn is supported by EASTBIO BBSRC PhD
studentship.References
[1] Minckwitz von G, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, et al. Response-Guided
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
2013;31(29):3623-3630.
[2] .Just N. Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment
with histograms. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(12):2205-2213.
[3] Loo CE, Straver ME, Rodenhuis S, et al. Magnetic
Resonance Imaging Response Monitoring of Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant
Chemotherapy: Relevance of Breast Cancer Subtype. Journal of Clinical
Oncology. 2011;29(6):660-666.
[4] Senn N, Masannat Y, Husain E, et al. q-Space Imaging
Yields a Higher Effect Gradient to Assess Cellularity than Conventional
Diffusion-weighted Imaging Methods at 3.0 T: A Pilot Study with Freshly Excised
Whole-Breast Tumors. Radiology: Imaging Cancer. 2019;1(1):e190008-e190008.
[5] Chin C-L, Wehrli FW, Fan Y, et al. Assessment of
axonal fiber tract architecture in excised rat spinal cord by localized NMR
q-space imaging: simulations and experimental studies. Magn Reson Med.
2004;52(4):733-740.
[6] Assaf Y, Mayk A, Cohen
Y. Displacement imaging of spinal cord using q-space diffusion-weighted MRI.
MRM. 2000;44(5):713-722.
[7] Yamada I, Hikishima K, Miyasaka N, et al. Esophageal carcinoma: Evaluation with q-space diffusion-weighted MR
imaging ex vivo. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(6):2262-2273.