Sujeet Kumar Mewar1, Sanjay Sharma2, Sanjay Thulka3, Ekta Dhamijia3, Pradeep Kumar1, Sridhar Panaiyadiyan4, Rama Jayasundar1, S. Senthil Kumaran1, S. Datta Gupta5, N.R. Jagannathan6, Rajeev Kumar4, and Virendra kumar1
1Department of NMR, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, Ansari nagar, India, 2Department of Radio-diagnosis, RPC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, Ansari nagar, India, 3Department of Radio-diagnosis, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, Ansari nagar, India, 4Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, Ansari nagar, India, 5Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, Ansari nagar, India, 6Present address.Department of Radiology, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India
Synopsis
The results
of the study showed that mpMRI guided in-bore biopsy has the potential to
increase the detection rate of PCa. Prebiopsy mpMRI of prostate was used for
identification of suspicious areas of malignancy which were targeted for
PCa detection and reducing unnecessary biopsies. The detection rate was
compared with TRUS guided 12 core biopsy. The data also indicated that using
prebiopsy mpMRI may also help to reduce unnecessary biopsies. The PCa detection
rate of in-bore mpMRI targeted biopsy was 53.84 % compared to 37.27% for
TRUS guided biopsy.
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is most frequent malignancy
in men over the age of 50 years worldwide1. Many clinically insignificant PCa screened by
PSA and DRE, may result on to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The aim of this
study was to evaluate role of prebiopsy mpMRI of prostate for finding
suspicious areas for detection of PCa and reducing unnecessary biopsies using
PIRADS scores ≤ 3.Method
Patients were recruited based on PSA >4 ng/ml
and abnormal DRE. MR investigations were carried out at 3.0 T MRI system, using
mp-MRI (T1-WI, T2-WI, DWI and DCE-MRI). Group I consist of 52 patients,
(mean age: 66.2 ±7.6 years, mean PSA: 20.1 ±19.8ng/ml) who underwent mpMRI
guided targeted in-bore biopsy while Group II had 110 patients who underwent
only TRUS guided 12 core systematic biopsy procedure. All Group I patients had
mpMRI and reporting according to the PIRADS version 2. T2W images were acquired
with the following parameters: TRof 6100 ms,TE of 100 ms, FOV = 240 x 240 mm,
and slice thickness 3 mm, DWI was carried out using seven b-values 0- 200,
400,800,1000,1500, 2000 s/mm2. ADC values of hypointense area which is
suspicious of malignancy were calculated from ADC map. For DCE-MRI, 20 ml
Gadolinium was injected at a rate of 3ml/s. Patients having PIRADS ≥ 3 scores
underwent in-bore biopsy, using a DynaTrim ( Invivo, USA) biopsy device with
needle guide and DynaCad software. Biopsy was carried out by transrectal
approach.Results
Our study demonstrated that mpMRI accurately
identified suspicious areas of lesion and MR guided inbore biopsy helped to
target these areas with accuracy (Figure 1). These targeted lesions with PIRADS
scores ≥ 3 were correlated with the histopathological findings (Figure 2).
The mean ADC for malignant lesions (0.56±0.09x10-3 mm2/s) lower compared to prostatitis (0.84±0.24x10-3 mm2/s,) and BPH (1.0±0.43x10-3 mm2/s). The use of ADC may reduce the number of
unnecessary biopsies cores. The PCa detection rate of in-bore targeted biopsy
was 53.84 % compared to 37.27% for TRUS biopsy. Using the in-bore biopsy
method, 270 core biopsies were collected from 52 patients (~5 cores per
patient). 140 core biopsies were from prostate cancer patients and out of
these, 92 (65 %) were positive for malignancy on histopathology (Figure 1). Out
of all 52 patients who underwent mpMRI guided biopsy, 28 were positive for
cancer with Gleason scores: 6(3+3), 7(3+4), 7(4+3), 8(4+4) and 9(4+5),10 (5+5)
while 14 patients had prostatitis and 10 patients had BPH (Table 1). 110 patients
who underwent TRUS guided 12 core biopsies revealed that 41 were positive
for PCa.Discussion
In this study we demonstrated that the use of
mpMRI guided in-bore biopsy for increased detection rate of PCa which reduces
the limitation associated with TRUS-guided biopsy especially for lesions
located in the central and anterior regions of the prostate. Our finding
suggests that using ADC values of suspicious area before the biopsy may help to
accurately target the ROI for biopsy and also to reduce unnecessary biopsies.
In addition mpMRI reporting PIRADS-v2 score correlated strongly with high-grade
PCa.Conclusion
mpMRI guided targeted in-bore biopsy has the potential to
significantly increased the detection rate of prostate cancer. In addition, the
targeted biopsy approach may also result in reducing unnecessary biopsies,
thereby improving the patient experience and comfort level associated
with biopsy procedureAcknowledgements
NRJ thanks SERB, Government of India funding
under FIST program (SR/FST/LSI-569/2013) and J.C. Bose Fellowship.References
1.
Ferlay J, et al. Cancer
incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015 Mar 1; 1;136(5) E359-86.
2.
V. Kasivisvanathan, et al.
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis: N Engl J Med.
2018 May 10; 378:1767-77.