4720

Monitoring Tumor Vascular Microenvironment  Response by Multiparametric MRI after Dual Inhibition of PFKFB3 and VEGF in Glioblastoma
Junfeng Zhang1 and Weiguo Zhang1
1Radiology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

Synopsis

Tumor vascular normalization induced by antiangiogenic therapy such as bevacizumab (BEV) is a promising strategy to remodel tumor microenvironment. However, this effect is transient and finally vanished because of inevitable adaptive therapy resistance. In this study, we found that targeting tumor glycolysis activator PFKFB3 is a novel potential strategy to enhance BEV therapy efficacy and prolonged vascular normalization in glioblastoma. IVIM parameters are much better than DCE-MRI as alternative translatable imaging biomarkers for evaluating tumor response and monitoring vascular normalization.

Background and Purpose

Tumor vascular normalization induced by antiangiogenic therapy such as bevacizumab(BEV) is a promising strategy to remodel tumor microenvironment, resulting in improved chemotherapeutic sensitivity, efficient drug delivery and active tumor immune response. However, this effect is transient and finally vanished because of inevitable adaptive therapy resistance. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether targeting tumor glycolysis by PFKFB3 blockade is a novel potential strategy to enhance BEV therapy efficacy and prolonged vascular normalization in glioblastoma(GBM) and to evaluate treatment-related molecular characterization and clinically translatable MR imaging biomarkers of tumor response.

Materials and Methods

Patient-derived orthotopic GBM xenografts in mice were established and imaged before and at different time points(day2,day5,day8,day12,day20) after treatment with bevacizumab(BEV), 3PO(PFKFB3 inhibitor), BEV and 3PO, and saline. Tumor volume, cellularity, neovascularization, and metabolites were monitored by T2WI, IVIM, DCE-MRI, and 1H-MRS, respectively. Pathology, proteome microarray and western blotting were analyzed to correlate with imaging parameters and evaluate post-treatment molecular profiling.

Results

BEV treatment-induced remarkable PFKFB3 expression with a time-dependent manner compared with control (P<0.05), and reduced reversely after the addition of 3PO. 3PO treatment enhanced BEV therapeutic efficacy with significant tumor growth inhibition, concomitant with a decrease of cell proliferation and augment of cell apoptosis. Multiparametric MRI and histology analyses revealed that compared with BEV monotherapy, BEV+3PO dual therapy prolonged and sustained vascular normalization with reduced vascular permeability and perfusion recovery, improving tumor oxygenate status and reduced lactate production(P<0.05). BEV monotherapy upregulated angiogenic cytokines (IL-4, IL-6, CXCL-16 and TIE-1) and activated alternative pathways(cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, IL-17 and PI3K-Akt). These molecules were downregulated after dual therapy(P<0.05). Imaging-histology correlation analysis shown that IVIM outperformed DCE-MRI for monitoring tumor therapeutic response. Perfusion fraction f was positively correlated with microvascular density(r=0.9177) and hypoxia(r=0.5681), and D* was correlated with vascular maturation(r=0.5884).

Conclusions

Targeting PFKFB3 has much potential to synergize with antiangiogenic therapy by abating tumor glycolysis and remodeling tumor vascular microenvironment. IVIM parameters are much better than DCE-MRI as alternative translatable imaging biomarkers for evaluating tumor response and monitoring vascular normalization without exogenous contrast media.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Weiguo Zhang and other colleagues for their generous guidance and support. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 81571660 and 81801672)

References

1.Huang Y, Kim B, Chan CK, et al. Improving immune-vascular crosstalk for cancer immunotherapy. Nature Reviews Immunology 2018;18:195-203.

2.Dai F, Kloepper J, Amoozgar Z, et al. Enhancing cancer immunotherapy using antiangiogenics: opportunities and challenges. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 2018; 15:325-340.

3.Li X, Carmeliet P. Targeting angiogenic metabolism in disease. Science 2018; 359:1335-1336.

4.Teuwen LA, Geldhof V, Carmeliet P. How glucose, glutamine and fatty acid metabolism shape blood and lymph vessel development. Developmental Biology 2017; 447:90-102.

5.Treps L, Conradi LC, Harjes U, et al. Manipulating Angiogenesis by Targeting Endothelial Metabolism: Hitting the Engine Rather than the Drivers-A New Perspective?[J]. Pharmacological Reviews 2016; 68:872-887.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28 (2020)
4720