Yuning Gu1, Yun Wu2, Hongyi Yang2, Yong Chen3, Jesse I. Hamilton4, Nicole Seiberlich3,4, Charlie Androjna5, Kai Zhong2, and Xin Yu1,3,6
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China, 3Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 4Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, 5Cleveland Clinic Pre-Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States, 6Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
This study demonstrates the development of a 3D T2-prepared
MRF sequence, in combination with a stack-of-spirals trajectory, for
simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping of an ex vivo macaque monkey (Macaca mulatta) brain with a voxel size of 0.35x0.35x1 mm3.
Retrospective evaluation of the undersampling accuracy showed that, for an
undersampling rate of up to 16, the normalized root mean square error was within
6% and 15% in T1 and T2 mapping, respectively. These
results suggest that 3D simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping
can be in <30 min with unprecedented spatial resolution.
Introduction
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) provides the
opportunity for simultaneous, multiparametric mapping with drastically
undersampled data. Previously we have developed
a 2D FISP-based MRF method for preclinical applications at high-fields. It allowed simultaneous T1 and T2
mapping in mouse brain with 156-µm in-plane resolution in 2 min
acquisition time. However, the method is sensitive to errors in B1
calibration. Hence, for imaging larger animals such as primates, the accuracy
of parameter estimation can be compromised due to B1 field
inhomogeneity. In a recent study, Hamilton et al1 developed a T2-prepared
MRF method that used small flip angles to achieve B1 insensitivity. In
this study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of using T2-prepared
MRF method for 3D high-resolution T1 and T2 mapping in
monkey brain at ultrahigh field. Methods
MRF Sequence: Fig. 1 shows the
FISP-based, T2-preprared MRF sequence used in the current study. The
sequence consisted of the acquisition of 768 frames partitioned into 16
segments (48 frames/segment). 4 segments were preceded by an inversion pulse
and 8 segments were preceded by a T2-preparation module with the
mixing time alternating between 20 and 40 ms. The flip angle in each segment was ramped up
sinusoidally from 4° to a maximal value between 6° and 15°. A 600-ms delay was
applied between each segment to allow partial signal recovery. Data acquisition
used constant TE and TR of 1.7 and 10 ms, respectively. A 4π dephasing per voxel was applied along the
slice-selective direction. Total acquisition time of a single fingerprint was ~20
s.
Ex Vivo Imaging Study: The MRF method was evaluated in ex vivo imaging
of brain tissue from macaque monkey (Macaca mulatta). 3D MRF data were acquired
using a stack-of-spirals trajectory. A variable density spiral readout
trajectory was designed to fully sample the inner 20x20 k-space with 48 interleaves and the entire k-space with 96 interleaves. The FOV and matrix size were 90x90x8 mm3
and 256x256x8, respectively, yielding a nominal voxel size of 0.35x0.35x1 mm3.
A fully sampled dataset was acquired in ~4.3 hours. T1 and T2 maps were
obtained from retrospectively undersampled data in the readout plane with an
undersampling rate of up to 16. The accuracy of T1 and T2
mapping using undersampled data were compared to that using fully sampled data
by calculating the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE). Results
3D T1 and T2 Mapping: Results of T1
and T2 mapping from fully sampled MRF data are shown in Fig. 2. A
large field inhomogeneity was observed at the ventral side of the brain,
causing a visible distortion to the T2 map. With a nominal spatial
resolution of 0.35x0.35x1 mm3, both T1 and T2
maps showed clear distinction between the white and gray matters. Comparing to in vivo results published in literature2 (Table 1), T1 in the ex vivo brain was significantly lower, ranging
from 600 to 700 ms in the gray
matter, and from 400 to 500 ms in the white matter. T2 ranged from 14 to 16
ms in gray matter and from 10 to 12 ms in white matter, which was also significantly shorter than T2
values in vivo.
Undersampling Capacity: T1 and T2
mapping from retrospectively undersampled data are shown in Fig. 3. NRMSE remained within 6% and 15% for T1
and T2 mapping, respectively, with an undersampling rate of up to 16
(Fig. 3b). T1 and T2 maps generated from 8- and 16-fold
undersampled data are shown in Fig. 3c-d.
With 16-fold undersampling, the acquisition time can be significantly
reduced to 2 min/slice.Conclusion and Discussion
T2-prepared MRF enabled 3D T1 and T2
mapping of monkey brain at a spatial resolution of 0.35x0.35x1 mm3 with
drastically undersampled data. This method provides the opportunity for in vivo
parameter mapping at unprecedented spatial resolution with feasible acquisition
time. Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the
National Institute of Health (R01 EB23704).References
1. Hamilton JI, Jiang Y, Chen Y, Ma D, Lo
W-C, Griswold M, Seiberlich N. MR fingerprinting for rapid quantification of
myocardial T1 , T2 , and proton spin density. Magn Reson Med.
2017;77:1446–1458.
2. Pfeuffer J, Merkle H, Beyerlein M,
Steudel T, Logothetis NK. Anatomical and functional MR imaging in the macaque
monkey using a vertical large-bore 7 Tesla setup. 2004;22:1343–1359.
3. Ma D, Jiang Y, Chen Y, McGivney D,
Mehta B, Gulani V, Griswold M. Fast 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting for a
whole-brain coverage. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:2190–2197.