Xiaoyun Liang1,2, Chun-Hung Yeh2, Juan F DomÃnguez D1, Govinda Poudel1, and Karen Caeyenberghs1
1Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia, 2Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Synopsis
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the
leading causes of death and disability in children and adolescents. Young TBI
patients suffer from gross motor deficits, such as postural control deficits, which
can severely compromise their daily life activities. Training programs have shown behavioral improvement; evidence of changes in WM morphology, however, has not been clear. We employ a fixel-based analysis (FBA) to investigate whether balance training results in significant changes of WM organization
across whole brain in young TBI patients over time. Our results have shown that balance training induced signigicant macrostructural white matter changes (i.e. log-FC & FDC).
INTRODUCTION
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of
death and disability in children and adolescents. Young TBI patients suffer
from gross motor deficits, such as postural control deficits, which can
severely compromise their daily life activities. Our previous research has demonstrated
a strong relationship between alterations in white matter (WM) organization, structural
brain networks and postural control deficits1,2. Various task-specific
training programs have been utilized to improve motor functioning in TBI
patients3, which have shown behavioural improvement; evidence of changes
in WM morphology induced by training is less clear4. Presumably, this
conclusion drawn from previous studies could be potentially deviated by the
inherent limitations of diffusion tensor analysis in detecting WM changes5.
In this study, we employ a fixel-based analysis (FBA)6 to
investigate whether balance training results in significant changes of WM organization
across whole brain in TBI patients over time. The advantages of applying FBA in
this TBI study include: (1) more fibre-specific metrics are used (metrics
associated with microstructural & macrostructural WM changes) as compared
to diffusion tensor metrics (such as mean diffusivity and fractional
anisotropy)7; (2) group differences are detected from whole brain
instead of only focusing on certain brain regions-of-interest7.METHODS
(1) Subjects
and training: 17 moderate to severe TBI patients (9 females; mean age =
15±3 years) and 17 typically developing subjects (10 females; mean age = 15±2
years). Both groups attended a home-based balance training program for 8 weeks,
with 5 sessions per week (~30 min/session)7.
(2) Assessment:
Participants underwent MRI scans at 3 time points: (a) pre-test: prior to
training; (b) post-test: after 8 weeks of training (mean =57±2days).
(3) MRI
data acquisition: Diffusion-weighted images (TR/TE=8000/91ms, voxel size: 2.2mm
isotropic, 60 contiguous slices, b=1000s/mm2 at 64 diffusion
gradient directions, along one b=0 s/mm2 volume) and T1-weighted
images (TR=2300ms, TE=2.98ms, voxel size: 1x1x1.1 mm3, FOV=256x240, 160
contiguous sagittal slices) were collected on a 3T Siemens Trio scanner.
(4) Fixel-based
analysis6: FBA was performed using MRtrix38 to
detect white matter changes between: (i) TBI and healthy control groups; (ii)
pre-test and post-test groups using the following steps:
(a) Data
pre-processing; (b) A unbiased group fibre orientation distribution (FOD) template
was generated using 26 subjects (13 from each group); (c) Whole-brain tractography
was conducted on the group FOD template with 20 million tracts generated, which
was filtered down to 2 million by applying spherical-deconvolution informed
filtering of tractograms (SIFT)9; (d) Three quantitative FBA metrics
were calculated: (i) Fibre density (FD): measuring fibre density of specific
white matter fibre bundles within voxels; (ii) Fibre-bundle cross-section in
logarithm scale (log-FC): measuring macrostructural change of a fibre bundle;
and (iii) a combined measure of a fibre density and cross-section (FDC).
(5) Statistical
analyses: Statistical inference was performed using the connectivity-based
fixel enhancement approach10. Specifically, two-sample t-test was
applied for the pre-test analysis, and a paired-sample t-test was conducted to
detect training effect on FBA metrics. (a) FBA results at baseline were
generated using 5000 permutations and family-wise error (FWE)-corrected
statistical p<0.05 is considered significant; (b) If no significant
changes are detected after training, the prior knowledge of susceptible fibers
from the baseline group analyses is obtained to increase the sensitivity for
detecting training effects. Practically, the small-template correction (STC) is
performed as follows: (i) A small template for each FBA metric is created by
thresholding (p<0.01, retaining ~1/15 of total number of whole-brain fixels)
uncorrected p-value map of same FBA metric from baseline results; (ii)
statistical analysis is then performed within the small template.RESULTS
Comparing groups at pre-test, Figures 1 shows streamline
segments in which associated fixels had significantly decreased values in all 3
FBA metrics (FWE-corrected p-value<0.05). Specifically, lower FD is
found mainly in fornix (Figure 1 (a)) and reductions of cross-section are
detected in superior cerebellar peduncles (Figure 1(b)); decreases of FDC distributed
corpus collosum, thalamus, and superior cerebellar peduncles (Figure 1(c)).
No significant white matter changes following balance
training have been detected following strict whole-FBA FWE correction. However,
using the small-template correction, our results demonstrate significantly
increased log-FC and FDC after receiving balance training (Figure 2 & 3). In
addition, the enhancement of both FBA metrics consistently locates in superior cerebellar peduncles. Further inspection reveals that enhanced FBA metrics
occur around the same areas that were shown to have reductions for both metrics.
Nevertheless, no significant changes in FD following balance training could be
observed.DISCUSSION
In this study, a longitudinal study that investigate balance
training effect in young TBI patients has been conducted using an advanced MRI
analysis approach, fixel-based analysis.
Using FBA, our longitudinal results showed that balance
training induced significant white matter changes in log-FC and FDC. These significant
fixels coincide with those that were impaired in TBI group during pre-test, suggesting
a sign of white matter recovery. Taking together, these findings suggest that
balance training contributes mainly to macrostructural (i.e. log-FC & FDC) instead
of microstructural changes (i.e. FD). Therefore, this approach should provide insights
into the underlying mechanisms of rehabilitative training.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Caeyenberghs K, Leemans A, Geurts M, Taymans T, Linden
CV, Smits-Engelsman BC, Sunaert S, Swinnen SP. Brain-behavior relationships in
young traumatic brain injury patients: DTI metrics are highly correlated with
postural control. Human Brain Mapping. 2010; 31(7):992-1002.
2. Caeyenberghs K, Leemans A, De Decker C, Heitger M,
Drijkoningen D, Linden V, Sunaert S, Swinnen SP. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2012; 1(1):
106-115.
3. Caeyenberghs K, Clement A, Imms P, Egan G, Hocking DR,
Leemans A, Metzler-Baddeley C, Jone DK, Wilson PH. Evidence for training-dependent
structural neuroplasticity in brain-injured patients: A critical review.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018; 32(2): 99-114.
4. Armstrong RC, Mierzwa AJ, Marion CM, Sullivan GM. White
matter involvement after TBI: Clues to axon and myelin repair capacity.
Experimental Neurology. 2016; 275(3): 328-33.
5. Jones DK, Knosche TR, Turner R. White matter integrity,
fiber count, and other fallacies: The do’s and don’ts of diffusion MRI. NeuroImage.
2012; 73:239-54.
6. Raffelt DA, Tournier JD, Smith RE, Vaughan DN, Jackson
G, Ridgway GR, Connelly A. Investigating white matter fiber density and
morphology using fixel-based analysis. NeuroImage. 2017: 144(A): 58-73.
7. 7. Drijkoningen D, Caeyenberghs K, Leunissen I, Vander
Linden C, Leemans A, Sunaert S, Duysens J, Swinnen SP. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;
7:240-51.
8. Tournier
JD, Smith RE, Raffelt D, Tabbara R, Dhollander T, Christiaens D, Pietsch M,
Jeurissen B, Yeh CH, Connelly A. MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software
framework for medical image processing and visualisation. NeuroImage 2019; 202:
116-37.
9. Simth RE, Donald JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. SIFT:
Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms. NeuroImage. 2012;
67: 298-312.
10. Raffelt DA,
Smith RE, Ridgway GR, Tournier JD, Vaughan DN, Rose S, Henderson R, Connelly A.
Connectivity-based fixel enhancement: Whole-brain statistical analysis of
diffusion MRI measure in the presence of crossing fibres. NeuroImage. 2015;
117:40-55.