Kirsten M Lynch1, Ryan P Cabeen2, Kristi A Clark2, and Arthur W Toga2
1Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Mark and Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Synopsis
White
matter maturation is a heterogeneous phenomenon that can be probed by
biophysical models. The purpose of this study was to characterize the development
of white matter tracts with NODDI from infancy through adolescence. To probe the
regional nature of white matter development, we use an along-tract approach to
enable more fine-grained analysis. White matter tracts showed exponential
age-related changes in NDI with spatially distinct maturational patterns. Our
along-tract analyses elucidate hemispheric asymmetries within tracts which may
be reflective of their functional specialization. Together, these results help
to disentangle the processes that define the trajectory of white matter
maturation.
Introduction
White matter
maturation is a nonlinear and heterogeneous phenomenon characterized by axonal
packing, increased axon caliber, and a prolonged period of myelination [1]. Neurite orientation dispersion and density
imaging (NODDI) is a diffusion MRI approach that probes tissue compartments and
provides biologically meaningful measures to quantify neurite density index
(NDI) and orientation dispersion index (ODI) [2]. The purpose of this study was to characterize
the magnitude and timing of major white matter tract maturation with NODDI from
infancy through adolescence in a cross-sectional cohort of 105 subjects
(0.1-18.8 years). To probe the regional nature of white matter development, we
use an along-tract approach that partitions tracts to enable more fine-grained
analysis.Methods
Cross-sectional neuroimaging data for 105 right-handed
typically developing children (7.8±4.9 years, 56 female, 0.1-18.8 years) were
obtained through the Cincinnati MR Imaging of NeuroDevelopment (C-MIND) data repository
(http://research.cchmc.org/c-mind)
at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital [3]. 2 dMRI scans (voxel size: 2 mm
isotropic; acquisition matrix: 112x109; 61 gradient-encoding directions with 7
B0 images (averaged). Scan 1: b=1000 s/mm2; TR/TE=6614/81 ms.
Scan 2: b=3000 s/mm2; TR/TE=8112/104 ms.) were acquired per
subject. Due to differences in TR/TE, each scan was normalized by the b=0
volume of the other acquisition. Neurite density index (NDI) and orientation dispersion
index (ODI) were calculated using the NODDI Matlab Toolbox [2]. An atlas-based streamline
tractography approach was used to obtain fiber bundle models for 9 bilateral
major white matter tracts (Figure 1)
using the Quantitative Imaging Toolkit (QIT) [4]. To enable more fine-grained analysis
of NODDI parameters within white matter tracts, we employed an along-tract
technique based on [5]. This approach partitions each tract
cross-sectionally into equidistant points by transforming a prototypical
centroid curve into subject native space and then streamline vertices were
reparameterized to best match the prototype to allow for correspondence across
streamlines at various cross-sections. Then, the average scalar parameter was
computed for each group of vertices that matched the vertices of the reference,
and the resulting along-bundle parameter maps were retained for subsequent
statistical analysis. At each point for each tract, a Brody growth curve with
the formula:
NDI = α - (α - β)e-k*age
was fit to relate tract parameters to age using nonlinear
least squares regression where α is
the asymptote, β is the y-intercept,
and k is the growth rate. At each
point, the age at 90% maturation was calculated. Bootstrap resampling was
performed along each tract with 5000 iterations to obtain a confidence interval
around the regional along-tract age estimates.Results
Average ODI varied along the lengths of the tract and
tended to be higher in superficial tract segments compared to the core (Figure 2). However, regional ODI was
not significantly associated with age and could not be described using a growth
curve. Average NDI varied along the lengths of each tract and Brody growth
models show the estimated age at terminal NDI varies along the length of each
tract (Figure 3). Some tracts have
similar patterns of development between the left and right hemispheres. For
example, the developmental pattern of left hemisphere FMIN fibers mirrors that
of the right FMIN – NDI develops latest in the cortical terminations to the
frontal lobe, and gradually develops earlier as the fibers pass through the
genu of the corpus callosum, bilaterally (Figure
4). Other tracts showed lateralized patterns of NDI development. For the
left CST, two regions develop later and with more variability than the right,
including the centrum semiovale and more inferiorally within the midbrain (Figure 5). The hemispheric asymmetries
observed in these regions cannot be explained by ODI variability, since
regional ODI is similar between the left and right hemispheres.Discussion
The
present study used NODDI parameters sensitized to microstructural features to
investigate the magnitude and timing of maturational changes in major white
matter tracts from infancy through adolescence. White matter demonstrates nonlinear age-related
increases in NDI with differing rates of change across tracts. Callosal fibers,
such as the forceps minor and forceps major, develop earlier than association
and fronto-temporal fibers. Additionally, ODI did not
show significant associations with age, suggesting that white matter
development over this time period is attributed to increases in neurite
density, likely through increased axonal packing and myelination. Along-tract
analyses of white matter maturation show the timing of NDI maturation varies
along the length of individual tracts, with deep white matter developing
earlier than superficial white matter. Furthermore, laterality was observed in
the timing of NDI maturation in the CST, which may be attributed to the
asymmetric functional specialization observed within the tract.Conclusion
In conclusion, this
study shows white matter microstructural maturation as measured with NODDI is
dynamic and heterogeneous. Along-tract analyses
provide a framework to uncover spatial distributions of microstructural age
effects within white matter tracts and our results show that maturation is not
uniform across individual tracts. Overall, our
results demonstrate the utility of NODDI models for characterizing the
heterochronous developmental patterns of white matter microstructure. These
results add to the growing body of research aiming to characterize how changes
in brain structure contribute to complex cognitive function, as these efforts
are necessary for ultimately understanding the origins of developmental
disability.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by
the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development (R00HD065832), the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging
and Bioengineering (P41EB015922 and U54EB020406), the National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS091586), and the National Institute of
Mental Health (R01MH094343). This work was partially supported by a NARSAD
Young Investigator Award. Data collection and sharing for this project was
funded by The Cincinnati MR Imaging of Neurodevelopment study (C-MIND)
(supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Grant HHSN275200900018C).References
[1] D. Rice and S. Barone, “Critical
periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: Evidence from
humans and animal models,” Environ. Health Perspect., vol. 108, no.
SUPPL. 3, pp. 511–533, 2000.
[2] H. Zhang, T. Schneider, C. A.
Wheeler-Kingshott, and D. C. Alexander, “NODDI: practical in vivo neurite
orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain.,” Neuroimage,
vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1000–16, Jul. 2012.
[3] S. Holland et al., “The C-MIND project:
normative MRI and behavioral data from children from birth to 18 years,” in Proceedings
of the 21st Annumal Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM),
Honolulu, HA, 2015.
[4] R. P. Cabeen, D. H. Laidlaw, and A. W.
Toga, “Quantitative imaging toolkit: Software for interactive 3D visualization,
data exploration, and computational analysis of neuroimaging datasets,” 2018,
p. Vol 2854.
[5] J. B. Colby, L. Soderberg, C. Lebel, I.
D. Dinov, P. M. Thompson, and E. R. Sowell, “Along-tract statistics allow for
enhanced tractography analysis,” Neuroimage, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 3227–3242,
2012.