Emilie T McKinnon1,2,3, Hunter G Moss1,3, Bashar W Badran4, Dorothea D Jenkins5, and Jens H Jensen1,3
1Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States, 2Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States, 3Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States, 4Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States, 5Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
Synopsis
Preterm or hypoxic ischemic birth is associated with
postpartum feeding problems and white matter dysmaturation. Noninvasive vagus nerve
stimulation has been proposed as therapy, and here we explore the application of high b-value diffusion
MRI to assess changes in white matter following stimulation. Our
hypothesis is that using high b-values will improve sensitivity to alterations
in white matter as compared with traditional diffusion measures. Power-law fits
for high b-value diffusion MRI data were investigated in 12 neonates. We find that
the power-law exponent decreases in early development and give preliminary
results for its application as a marker for treatment response.
Introduction
Preterm or hypoxic ischemic (HIE) birth has been
shown to result in white matter (WM) dysmaturation and impaired motor
skills. A common consequence is the inability to master oral feeding postpartum. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) paired with feeding has
been proposed as a technique to stimulate WM maturation in infants.1 To monitor treatment, there is a
need for non-invasive measures with a good sensitivity to WM changes. Here we
investigated power-law fits for the direction-averaged diffusion MRI (dMRI) signal
at high b-values in 12 neonates between 38-54 weeks of gestational age
(GA). Recent work has shown that, in adult WM, the direction-averaged dMRI signal at high b-values (≥4000s/mm2) is dominated by intra-axonal
water and decays as a power law.2-4 Our hypothesis is that high b-values increase sensitivity to alternations in WM by
enhancing the relative contribution of water within axons compared to extra-axonal water. The variation in the
power-law exponent with age was compared to traditional dMRI metrics. For
a subset of 6 infants with longitudinal dMRI data, the ability of the
exponent’s rate of change to predict taVNS treatment response was investigated.Methods
Twelve preterm or
HIE infants born at 32±5.3 weeks GA were scanned on a Siemens Skyra 3T MRI. The GA ranged between 38-54 weeks
at time of scanning. All subjects were enrolled in a taVNS study to treat the
inability to master feeding. On average, patients received 23±13 taVNS
sessions.
Data were obtained using a twice-refocused dMRI
sequence for b=0,1000,2000,4000,6000s/mm2 and 64
diffusion-encoding directions. Other imaging parameters were: TE=141 ms,
TR=6400 ms and voxel-size=(3mm)3. Scans were acquired before and
after taVNS. Data quality was improved by denoiseing,5 removing Gibbs ringing artifacts,6 and
correcting for Rician noise bias7 and motion.8 Of the 24 dMRI datasets, 6 were discarded due to excessive motion artifacts. However, each
subject had at least one good dataset, and 6 had usable data for both
time points.
The direction-averaged dMRI signal ($$$\overline{S}$$$) was calculated for dMRI data with b-values b4=4000s/mm2
and b6=6000s/mm2 by averaging over all gradient
directions. In healthy adults, it has been shown that the b-value dependence of ($$$\overline{S}$$$) follows a power-law
decay ($$$\overline{S}=C \cdot b^{-\alpha}$$$).2 Here, the apparent exponent alpha ($$$\alpha$$$) was calculated using: $$\alpha=\frac{ln(\overline{S}_4/\overline{S}_6)}{ln(b_6/b_4)} (1),$$ where $$$\overline{S}_4$$$ and $$$\overline{S}_6$$$ represent $$$\overline{S}$$$ at b=b4
and b=b6, respectively. We refer to the exponent calculated
with Eq.1 as “apparent” because a power-law decay was not empirically verified
as has been done in adults.
Since WM
continues to develop postpartum, we studied the relation between $$$\alpha$$$ and age at time of scan. We
focused on the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC), as it is one of
the first regions to myelinate. As comparison, conventional diffusion metrics
were calculated9 from dMRI data with
b=0-2000s/mm2. In addition, these were used for tract-based
spatial statistics (TBSS) to locate the fractional anisotropy (FA)
skeleton which was used as a WM mask.10Results
Figure 1 demonstrates the distribution of $$$\alpha$$$ in WM for an infant of 54 weeks GA. The
average value $$$\alpha=1.37\pm0.8$$$ is significantly higher than values previously reported for adults.2-4 Figure 2 demonstrates that in the PLIC $$$\alpha$$$, radial diffusivity (Drad), and axial diffusivity (Dax) decrease rapidly in early development,
while FA increases with age. Note that $$$\alpha$$$ had the largest correlation coefficient
($$$r=0.79$$$). Figure 3 shows how the metrics
change in the PLIC for 6 infants before and after taVNS. The red lines
correspond to infants that responded well to taVNS. Responders consistently
show a drop in $$$\alpha$$$, while other
metrics either had a mixed response or showed no difference between responders
and non-responders. To quantify this, we calculated confusion
matrices (Figure 4) by estimating the diffusion metrics at follow up using the
trendlines from Figure 2. For example, a data point was considered a true
positive when $$$\alpha$$$ at follow up ($$$\alpha_2$$$) was smaller than the
estimated $$$\widetilde{\alpha}_2$$$. A similar analysis was
done for all metrics. The treatment response was predicted better by $$$\alpha$$$ (specificity:100%, sensitivity:100%) than by
FA (specificity:33%, sensitivity:33%), Drad (specificity:0%
sensitivity:60%) or Dax (specificity:50%, sensitivity:50%).Discussion
The apparent exponent
$$$\alpha$$$ in infants was found to be substantially lower
than in adult WM.2,3
A possible mechanism for this is more rapid intercellular water exchange due to
the lesser degree of myelination for infants. Other contributing factors might
be the large population of cell bodies present in early development.11 In the PLIC, $$$\alpha$$$ decreased linearly with age at an average rate
of 0.03/week. Infants that responded well to treatment had WM changes
consistently higher than this rate while non-responders had little to no observable
change in $$$\alpha$$$. Within this limited dataset, $$$\alpha$$$ demonstrated the best predictive power for
treatment response (specificity:100%, sensitivity:100%). The better
sensitivity for $$$\alpha$$$ could be a consequence of high b-value dMRI data being more heavily
weighted with contributions from water in restricted compartments, such as
myelinated axons, in comparison to signal from lower b-value data. Future work should focus on
increasing the sample size and on validating the power-law dependence in
infants. Nonetheless, our preliminary results suggest that using high b-value
dMRI is potentially useful in the study of WM maturation of non-feeding infants
treated with taVNS.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by F31NS108623
(to H. Moss) and T32DC014435
(to J. Dubno). References
1. Badran BW, Jenkins DD, DeVries WH,
Dancy M, Summers PM, Mappin GM, Bernstein H, Bikson M, Coker-Bolt P, George MS.
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for improving oromotor
function in newborns. Brain Stimul 2018;11(5):1198-1200.
2. McKinnon
ET, Jensen JH, Glenn GR, Helpern JA. Dependence on b-value of the
direction-averaged diffusion-weighted imaging signal in brain. Magn Reson
Imaging 2017;36:121-127.
3. Veraart
J, Fieremans E, Novikov DS. On the scaling behavior of water diffusion in human
brain white matter. Neuroimage 2018.
4. Moss
HG, McKinnon ET, Glenn GR, Helpern JA, Jensen JH. Optimization of data
acquisition and analysis for fiber ball imaging. Neuroimage 2019;200:690-703.
5. Veraart
J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, Ades-Aron B, Sijbers J, Fieremans E. Denoising of
diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage 2016;142:394-406.
6. Kellner
E, Dhital B, Kiselev VG, Reisert M. Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on
local subvoxel-shifts. Magn Reson Med 2016;76(5):1574-1581.
7. Gudbjartsson
H, Patz S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med
1995;34(6):910-914.
8. Andersson
JLR, Sotiropoulos SN. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance
effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage
2016;125:1063-1078.
9. Tabesh
A, Jensen JH, Ardekani BA, Helpern JA. Estimation of tensors and tensor-derived
measures in diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011;65(3):823-836.
10. Smith
SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, Watkins
KE, Ciccarelli O, Cader MZ, Matthews PM, Behrens TE. Tract-based spatial
statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage
2006;31(4):1487-1505.
11. Palombo
M, Ianus A, Guerreri M, Nunes D, Alexander DC, Shemesh N, Zhang H. SANDI: a
compartment-based model for non-invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by
diffusion MRI. arXiv 2019(arXiv:1907.02832).