Lexiaozi Fan1,2, Hassan Haji-Valizadeh3, Cynthia K Rigsby4, Joshua D. Robinson4, Paige Constance Nelson4, and Daniel Kim1,2
1Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States, 3Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 4Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
Cardiovascular
MRI is an excellent diagnostic tool for children with congenital heart disease
(CHD), but the long acquisition times, and need for sedation/anesthesia and the
administration of a gadolinium-based contrast results it only accounts for only
2% of pediatric cardiac diagnostic tests. Our 20-min, free-breathing,
non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol is potentially a
game-changer, because its total scan time (20 min) is considerably shorter than
a standard protocol (90 min) and does not require anesthesia or gadolinium-based
contrast agent.
Introduction
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common type of birth defects,
accounting for nearly 1% of live births in the US1,2. Lifetime
monitoring, including imaging, is necessary for surviving children with CHD.
Cardiovascular MRI is an excellent diagnostic tool for children with CHD. However,
cardiovascular MRI accounts for only 2% of pediatric cardiac diagnostic tests due
to a variety of factors, including: (a) long scan times (~90 min) and (b)
requisite sedation/anesthesia and gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), both
of which adds risk and cost and raises potential issues for those children who
will require lifetime follow-up3. In this study, we sought to
develop and evaluate rapid, free-breathing, non-contrast cardiovascular MRI
(real time phase contrast (rt-PC) and real time cine (rt-Cine)) and magnetic
resonance angiography (MRA) methods, in order to drastically reduce the scan
time to 20 min while producing comparable image quality without requiring GBCA
or anesthesia.Methods
Human
Subjects & Pulse Sequence:
We enrolled 9 patients (2 females, 7 males, mean age = 9.5 ± 1.6 years) who are
scheduled to undergo clinical pediatric CMR (4 with anesthesia; 6 with GBCA; 1
with ferumoxytol; 2 without any contrast agent; all standard clinical doses).
Prior to clinical CMR, we conducted our 20-min protocol, which included localizers,
real-time cine, real-time phase-contrast, and free-breathing MRA (without
preparation pulse). For relevant imaging parameters, please see Table 1.
Image
reconstruction: The CS reconstruction was performed off-line on a GPU workstation
equipped with MATLAB (R2017a, The MathWorks). To accelerate the reconstruction,
we applied software coil compression using PCA (8 virtual coils) and used
GPU-based NUFFT4. For rt-cine, CS reconstruction was performed using
temporal total variation as the sparsifying transform with normalization weight
of 0.05 (30 iterations). For rt-PC, CS reconstruction was performed with temporal
total variation and temporal principal component analysis as two sparsifying
transforms with normalization weight of 0.001 each (30 iterations). For ncMRA,
CS reconstruction was performed with total variation along the respiratory
motion and slice dimensions with normalized weight of α=0.00075 and β=0.00015,
respectively, in combination with normalized fidelity weight of 0.002.
Image quality analysis: Two clinical readers independently graded the images on a 5-point (1:
worst, 3: clinically acceptable, 5: best) Likert scale. For rt-cine, 4
categories were: myocardial edge definition, temporal fidelity, noise level,
and artifact level. For ncMRA, 3 categories were: vascular conspicuity, noise
level, and artifact level. Given the small sample size (N= 9), we assumed non-normal
distribution for visual scores and compared two groups using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, where p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results
All
9 patients successfully underwent our rapid CMR protocol and the clinical
standard CMR protocol. The mean scan time was 98 ± 40 min for clinical CMR and 21
± 4 min for our rapid CMR, corresponding to 79% reduction in scan time. Figure 1 shows
representative cine images of three different patients, illustrating image
quality. Figure 2 shows representative ncMRA images of one patient in multiple
planes (aortic arch, pulmonary artery, coronary origins, pulmonary vein),
illustrating different image quality between clinical and our rapid ncMRA. Figure 3 shows representative phase-contrast
images of a patient in 4 different planes, illustrating more blurring with our
rapid rt-PC. For rt-Cine, as summarized in Table 2,
the median myocardial edge definition, noise scores and artifact scores were
not significantly different, whereas the temporal fidelity score was
significantly different. Nonetheless, all scores were above the clinically
acceptable (3.0) cut point. For
ncMRA, as summarized in Table
2, the vascular conspicuity and artifact scores were not significantly
different, whereas the noise score was significantly different. Again, all
scores were above the clinically acceptable (3.0) cut point. Conclusion
This study
describes development and evaluation a 20-min free-breathing, non-contrast CMR
protocol for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Compared with
clinical standard, this protocol reduced the scan time by 79% and eliminate
GBCA and anesthesia. Future studies involving more patients and calculation of
quantitative metrics (LVEF, aortic dimension, flow) are warranted to further
evaluate the clinical utility of 20-min protocol. Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National
Institutes of Health (R01HL116895, R01HL138578, R21EB024315, R21AG055954) and
the American Heart Association (19IPLOI34760317). References
1. Hoffman JI
and Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. Journal of the .
2002;39:1890-900. American College of Cardiology
2. Reller
MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso T, Mahle WT and Correa A. Prevalence of
congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998-2005. . The Journal of
pediatrics 2008;153:807-13.
3. McDonald RJ,
McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, Thielen KR, Williamson EE and
Eckel LJ. Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR
Imaging. 2015;275:772-782.
4. Fessler JA.
On NUFFT-based gridding for non-Cartesian MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance.
2007;188(2):191-5.