Bing Yao1,2, Hannah Ovadia1, Gail Forrest3, and Steven Kirshblum2,4
1Rocco Ortenzio Neuroimaging Center, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, United States, 2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States, 3Center for Mobility and Rehabilitation Engineering Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, United States, 4Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, NJ, United States
Synopsis
Physicians rely on self-reports to monitor and evaluate the functional outcome in patients with spinal cord injury during their rehabilitation.
These clinical and outcome measurements can be subjective and sometimes impractical if patients have cognitive difficulty. Traditional
clinical MRI scans can provide doctors more objective information but they are not sensitive to detect the progression or repair during
patient’s recovery. In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of DTI technique in detecting SCI injury and its progression or recovery over
the course of rehabilitation in the individuals with SCI.
Introduction
Today, the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNSCI), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) are
the gold standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (SCI)1,2. However, ISNSCI, intended to be a clinical classification system, is subjective
and relatively insensitive to incremental neurophysiological and functional changes during both acute and chronic stages of recovery. Moreover, the
ISNSCI cannot evaluate the spinal cord (SC) function below the neurological level3. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as a more
objective tool to help clinicians make prognosis. However, study showed that conventional clinical MRI does not correlate well with scores measured with
ISNSCI4. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is an advanced MRI tool capable of probing white matter integrity through measuring directional diffusion of
water molecules, thus may providing more microscopic details. In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of DTI in detecting SCI injury and its
progression or recovery over the course of rehabilitation.Methods and Materials
Participants: Eight
acute SCI patients (age=38.8±18.5 y/o, Female/Male=2/6,
AIS grade=B to D) and Eight gender and age matched healthy controls (HCs) have
participated the study. All the participants went through five visits including
imaging and outcome measurement sessions over the course of the first-year post
injury (baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the
commencement of rehabilitative treatment). The outcome measurements
including
American Spinal Injury Association Impairment
Scale (ASIA), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III
(SCIM
III) were performed at each visit for the patient group.
Image
Acquisition: All
MRIs were acquired at a 3T Siemens scanner with a 20-channel
head/neck
coil and a 32-channel spine coil. A high resolution T2-weighted spin echo
sequence was used to collect anatomical spine images on sagittal plane. The axial DTI
covering the entire
cervical
and thoracic sections of the cord was acquired with the following parameters:
TE=97ms,
TR=3600ms, Flip angle=90º; in-plane resolution=132x132mm, thickness = 3mm, 30
directions
with b=1000s/mm. Another anatomical scan using T2*-weighted Multi-Echo Data
Image
Combination (MEDIC) sequence matching the DTI slice location was acquired.
Data Analysis: The raw
DTI data were corrected for eddy current distortion and motion using
FSL then
further processed using Diffusion Toolkit. DTI indices including FA, MD, AD,
and RD
were
computed for each voxel. ROIs at each disk and midlevel locations were
carefully drawn
from C2
to T12 level on the FA map, with the guide of T2* images. Virtual nerve fibers
were
reconstructed
using the fiber assignment through line propagation approach based on 2nd order Runge Kutta algorithm. Above-
and below-injury values were computed by averaging values above/below each patient’s
location of injury (for HC’s, the location of the matched patient’s injury
level was used). A mixed model implemented in R was adapted for the statistical analysis.Results
Fig. 1 shows a comparison of the MRI images and tractography
for a SCI patient and a matched healthy control. Continuous and longer fibers
(blue tracks) can be observed on the healthy subject, indicating the intact
integrity of the white matter fibers. On the other hand, shorter and thinner
fibers are seen on the SCI patient, suggesting the damaged white matter
fibers. The outcome measures by SCIM shows a significant
change over the 5 visits(f(4,28) = 13.7, p<.001), suggesting a recovery over
the six months post injury. The ASIA result shows the same recovery curve over
time but not significantly (Fig. 2). Figs. 3 and 4 show the mean values of the
DTI indices (AD, FA, MD and RD) above and below the area of injury across five
visits. The AD and FA in the SCI group are significantly lower than those in
the HC group on the spine above the injury level except for visit 5 (Fig. 3). The
same trend are also observed on AD in the below injury but FA did not show a
significant difference between the two groups (Fig. 4). No significant differences
were found in MD and RD between SCI and HC groups.Discussion and Conclusions
DTI has been widely used in studying the human
brain. Our study on the spinal cord shows DTI is a sensitive tool to detect SC
fiber abnormalities, which supports the hypothesis that DTI can detect
the reduced nerve fiber structure quality in SCI. FA and AD showed
significantly lower values in the SCI group, suggesting that these measures
could be more sensitive to detecting damage than MD and RD. These data also
show more differences above the level of injury compared to below-injury
regions, suggesting a greater impact to above nerves due to injury. A higher FA
value was observed in the upper spine than lower spine, which is consistent
with the fact that higher white to gray matter ratio exists in the upper spine4.
A lower FA and higher AD were found at the six months of recovery in the below
injury region, indicating the occurrence of structural changes during the
recovery phase in that region. Our study demonstrates that DTI may serve as a
tool to assess the changes at different regions of the spine, of which
information is usually hard to be obtained by traditional evaluation methods.Acknowledgements
This study is supported by grants NIH/NINDS R21 NS085456 and State of New Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord Research CSCR15ERG013.References
1) Kirshblum, S.C., et al., International
standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J
Spinal Cord Med, 2011. 34(6): p. 535-46.
2) Marino, R.J. and D.E. Graves, Metric properties of the ASIA motor
score: subscales improve correlation with functional activities. Arch
Phys Med Rehabil,
2004. 85(11): p. 1804-10.
3) Mulachey, M.
J., et al., Neuromuscular scoliosis in children with
spinal cord injury. Top
Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil,
2013. 19(2): p. 96-103.
4) Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M., et al., Investigating
cervical spinal cord structure using axial diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage, 2002. 16: p. 93-102.