Lisa Novello1, Stefano Tambalo1, Thorsten Feiweier2, and Jorge Jovicich1
1CIMeC, Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy, 2Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
In
Double-Diffusion-Encoding sequences, concomitant gradients may
introduce spatial bias in the measured MRI signal. It is important to
characterize such biases since they can affect the accuracy of
quantitative microstructural metrics in brain studies. In this work,
we assess the signal deviations at different positions along the
scanner z-axis in an isotropic phantom for both single- and
twice-refocused spin-echo sequences.
Introduction
Double-Diffusion-Encoding
(DDE) MRI sequences1
are attracting a growing interest since in the long mixing time
regime they allow to characterize diffusion anisotropy at a
microscopic scale without confounding effects of structural
macroscopic arrangements (e.g.
axonal fibers orientations in the brain)2,3.
This can be achieved by encoding diffusion twice in a single
acquisition (Fig. 1). However, such encoding strategies might be
affected by concomitant gradients corrupting the diffusivity
estimation in brain tissue, as a function of sample position, slice
orientation and sequence details4.
In this study, we used a clinical scanner to evaluate the possible
impact of concomitant gradients in DDE MRI as a function of two
factors: sample position (isocenter and off-centered along z-axis)
and sequence variations (pulsed gradient (PG) diffusion encoding with
single refocused spin-echo (PG-SE) and twice-refocused spin-echo
(PG-TRSE), respectively).Materials and Methods
Images from an isotropic brain-sized spherical
oil phantom were collected on a 3T scanner (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 64 channel head-neck RF coil. Multishell
axial images were collected with a prototype sequence utilizing Single
Diffusion Encoding (SDE PG-SE), DDE
PG-SE and DDE PG-TRSE (i) by centering
the phantom position at the scanner isocenter (isocenter condition), and (ii) by centering the phantom position at
z = 75 mm (off-center condition, DDE
images only). The adopted sequence applies a compensation of linear concomitant
field contributions.
For all conditions and sequences, a b = 0 s/mm2 image and DWI
images with the following b-values
were acquired: 100, 700, 1400, 2000 s/mm2 4. Imaging parameters were: FOV = 272 x 272 mm2,
isotropic resolution = 2 mm, number of slices = 68, no slice gap. For all
images, Partial Fourier (PF) = 0.75, GRAPPA = 2. For SDE PG-SE images, 64
directions were acquired per shell, TE = 60 ms, TR = 9200 ms. For all DDE
images, a total of 72 direction combinations were acquired per shell using the
5-design scheme2. TE = 140 ms, TR = 11900 ms. δ = 21.9 ms, Δ = 31.1 ms, TM = 14.7 ms (Fig. 1).
All data was eddy-current and motion corrected in
ElastiX using extrapolated references4,5. For each b-shell
and DWI gradient encoding, in a single phantom reference slice at z = 0 and z =
75, we computed the mean S(b)/S(0) ratio, where S(b) is the signal from
each DWI volume and S(0) the signal
from the b = 0 s/mm2
volume, including only voxels within a circle 16 mm apart from the phantom
surface (Fig. 2). Mean ratio differences between positions per each sequence
were investigated by means of paired t-tests in R. Standard Deviation
(SD) values were computed for each b-value, sequence, and condition
combination.Results
Distributions of mean ROI S(b)/S(0)
ratios are shown in Fig. 3. For all b-values, the paired t-tests
revealed significant mean S(b)/S(0) ratio differences as a
function of phantom position for the DDE PG-SE (for all b-values, p <
1*10-5) but not the DDE PG-TRSE sequences (for all b-values, p >
.01). Interestingly, the DDE PG-TRSE sequence showed the largest SD value both
in the isocenter and off-center positions for all b-values (largest SD: off-center
condition, b = 2000 s/mm2, SD(S(b)/S(0))
= 0.0175, Fig. 4). Discussion
Concomitant gradients have been shown to
introduce detrimental effects on DDE-MRI quality4. The experimental
evaluation of possible signal deviations potentially occurring within the brain
volume is an important quality assurance check. In our experiment, we adopted
an isotropic phantom to detect possible directionally dependent signal
deviations which could not be associated to the phantom microscopic properties.
In agreement with previous literature reports4, our results suggest
that significant differences in signals arise at 75 mm from the isocenter in
DDE PG-SE but not in PG-TRSE sequences, which is compatible with possible
concomitant field effects, despite the applied compensation for linear
contributions. Interestingly, we observed larger SD for mean ROI S(b)/S(0) ratios in DDE PG-TRSE sequences.
While theoretically PG-TRSE sequences are expected to be free of concomitant
gradients effects, we speculate that the observed signal variation might be
instead associated with eddy-currents effects. Evaluating signal deviations at
variable positions with respect to the isocenter is an important quality
assurance check to assess the spatial uniformity of diffusivity estimation
throughout the volume considered.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Shemesh N., et al., Magn. Reson. Med.,
2016, 75:82-87
[2]
Jespersen S.N., et al., NMR Biomed.,
2013, 26:1647–1662
[3]
Özarslan E., JMR,
2009, 199:56-67
[4]
Szczepankiewicz F., et al., Magn. Res.
Med., 2019, 82(4):1424-1437
[5]
Nilsson M., et al., PLoS One,
2015, 10(11): e0141825