Qiyuan Tian1,2, Chanon Ngamsombat1, Hong-Hsi Lee3,4, Daniel R. Berger5, Yuelong Wu5, Qiuyun Fan1,2, Berkin Bilgic1,2, Dmitry S. Novikov3,4, Els Fieremans3,4, Bruce R. Rosen1,2, Jeff W. Lichtman5, and Susie Y. Huang1,2
1Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 4Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 5Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
Synopsis
Diffusion microstructural metrics represent inferences of
axonal size and morphology rather than directly imaged quantities, validation
of these metrics is essential. With novelty
of multibeam-serial electron microscopy, high-resolution images of human white
matter can be acquired at nanometer resolution over volumes of tissue large
enough to capture the diffusion-MRI dynamics extending over length scales
comparable to MRI voxel size. This work presents automated segmentation of serial
EM of a sub-volume of human white matter using a 3D convolutional neural
network studying variations in axonal diameter over the longest axons within
the volume of tissue.
Introduction
Diffusion MRI offers a noninvasive probe
of tissue microstructural properties such as axonal size, shape and dispersion.
As diffusion microstructural metrics
represent inferences of axonal size and morphology rather than directly imaged
quantities, validation of these metrics is essential. With the development of multibeam serial
electron microscopy1, high-resolution images of human
white matter now can be acquired at nanometer resolution over volumes of tissue
large enough to capture the diffusion MRI dynamics extending over length scales
comparable to the MRI voxel size (~mm). Here, we segmented
myelinated axons and intra-axonal space in a sub-volume of human white matter measuring
up to ~100-200 um in length
using supervised deep learning with 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and
transfer learning. The goal was to estimate histology-based axonal measures in
human white matter, including inner and outer diameters and the myelin g-ratio,
that would serve as ground-truth validation of axonal structure and geometry
and aid in the interpretation of biophysical parameters estimated by diffusion
MRI.Methods
Data acquisition. A sample of human brain tissue was obtained intraoperatively
from the posterior left middle temporal gyrus of a 47-year-old female who
underwent surgery for removal of an epileptogenic focus in the left
hippocampus. Immediately following excision, the tissue sample was placed in glutaraldehyde/paraformaldehyde
fixative, stained with reduced osmium tetroxide and embedded in Epon resin2.
The cured block containing full-thickness cerebral cortex and subcortical white
matter was trimmed to a 2×3 mm rectangle and a depth of 200 um and imaged using
serial-section scanning EM (Sigma, Carl Zeiss) with a custom-built automated
tape-collecting ultramicrotome3. The subset of images within subcortical white matter (volume
of 131×147×39 um3) was extracted from the entire dataset. Each image
was acquired at 8×8×30 nm3 resolution with a data size approximating
375 GB per section. To reduce the data size and computational load, the
data were down-sampled to 32×32×30 nm3.
Segmentation
pipeline. An iterative training/fine-tuning strategy
incorporating transfer learning was adopted to reduce the volume of ground-truth,
manually segmented images required for training the CNNs (Fig.2). A 2D/3D U-Net4 was initially trained on an existing mouse corpus
callosum EM dataset that included ground-truth segmentation of myelin and IAS5
(http://cai2r.net/resources/software/intra-axonal-space-segmented-3d-scanning-electron-microscopy-mouse-brain-genu).
The U-Net was then applied to the human EM data and fine-tuned using ground-truth
manual segmentation delineated by an experienced neuroradiologist (C.N.) in an
iterative fashion. For each iteration, the myelin and IAS were manually cleaned
up on consecutive slices based on the U-Net segmentation results from the
previous iteration. Image
artifacts such as image saturation and missing image content (Fig.1 d-h) were
automatically detected and were blacked out, i.e., set to an image intensity of
0. 3D U-Nets were adopted to utilize the across-slice smoothness/redundancy to
synthesize the segmentation of the blacked-out regions.
Network deployment. The U-Net was implemented using the Keras
API (https://keras.io/)
with a Tensorflow (https://www.tensorflow.org/) backend, 4/5 levels, 32/64 kernels at the highest level
and 2× kernels for each lower level, 3×3×3 kernels with “ReLU” activation. The
output layer uses 1×1×1 kernels with “sigmoid” activation and “binary_crossentropy”
loss for myelin only segmentation, with “softmax” activation and “categorical_crossentropy”
loss for simultaneous myelin and IAS segmentation. The training was performed using
an NVidia V100 GPU.
Axonal quantification. Analysis tools in the Random Walker (RaW)
segmentation software5 (https://github.com/NYU-DiffusionMRI/RaW-seg) were used to quantify the axonal parameters.
Briefly, adjacent axons with contact of their myelin sheaths were segmented
using a non-weighted distance transform and watershed algorithm on the CNN-segmented
IAS masks (Fig. 4e). For each axon, the cross-sectional areas (Ω) of the segmented IAS and IAS+myelin masks
perpendicular to the axonal skeleton (i.e., a line connecting the center of
mass of each slice) were calculated to quantify the inner and outer axon
diameters. The axon diameter was calculated as the diameter of a circle with
the same area (2*sqrt(Ω/pi)). The g-ratio was
computed as the ratio between the inner and outer axon diameters.Results
The CNN segmentation of myelin and IAS was similar to the
manual segmentation and improved after each iteration (Fig.3). The 3D CNNs were
capable of robustly segmenting the artifactual regions (Fig.3, row c,d, columns
v,vi) by utilizing across-slice smoothness. Three-dimensional
reconstruction of all segmented intra-axonal space/axons in the tissue volume
clearly depicts axonal beading and undulation (Fig.4). The
along-axon mean inner and outer axon diameters and g-ratios were quantified from
a representative axon (Fig.5).Discussion
Marked variation in axonal diameter was observed
along the axes of the longest individual axons identified within the volume of
tissue, in keeping with previous observations in mouse5,6. Greater variability was observed in the structure
of the myelin sheath in the human white matter compared to the mouse EM data,
suggesting greater biological complexity in the organization of the human
myelin sheath7,8. Monte Carlo diffusion simulations using the
myelin and IAS segmentation are being pursued in parallel to understand the
implications of axonal undulation and beading on the diffusion MRI signal. Future
work will optimize CNNs for segmentation and apply CNNs to the entire volume to
quantify the axonal diameters and g-ratios. Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH U01EB026996, NIH
R01NS088040, NIH P41EB017183.References
[1] Eberle, A. L. & Zeidler, D.
Multi-Beam Scanning Electron Microscopy for High-Throughput Imaging in
Connectomics Research. Frontiers in
neuroanatomy 12, 112,
doi:10.3389/fnana.2018.00112 (2018).
[2] Tapia,
J. C. et al. High-contrast en bloc
staining of neuronal tissue for field emission scanning electron microscopy. Nature protocols 7, 193-206, doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.439 (2012).
[3] Baena,
V., Schalek, R. L., Lichtman, J. W. & Terasaki, M. Serial-section electron
microscopy using automated tape-collecting ultramicrotome (ATUM). Methods in cell biology 152, 41-67,
doi:10.1016/bs.mcb.2019.04.004 (2019).
[4] Falk,
T. et al. U-Net: deep learning for
cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat
Methods 16, 67-70, doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0261-2
(2019).
[5] Lee,
H.-H. et al. Along-axon diameter
variation and axonal orientation dispersion revealed with 3D electron
microscopy: implications for quantifying brain white matter microstructure with
histology and diffusion MRI. Brain Structure
and Function 224, 1469-1488
(2019).
[6] Aboitiz,
F., Scheibel, A. B., Fisher, R. S. & Zaidel, E. Individual differences in
brain asymmetries and fiber composition in the human corpus callosum. Brain research 598, 154-161, doi:10.1016/0006-8993(92)90179-d (1992).
[7] Liewald,
D., Miller, R., Logothetis, N., Wagner, H. J. & Schuz, A. Distribution of
axon diameters in cortical white matter: an electron-microscopic study on three
human brains and a macaque. Biological
cybernetics 108, 541-557,
doi:10.1007/s00422-014-0626-2 (2014).
[8] Abdollahzadeh,
A., Belevich, I., Jokitalo, E., Tohka, J. & Sierra, A. Automated 3D Axonal
Morphometry of White Matter. Scientific
reports 9, 6084 (2019).