Ezequiel Farrher1, Chia-Wen Chiang2, Kuan-Hung Cho2, Richard Buschbeck1, Ming-Jye Chen2, Zaheer Abbas1, Kuo-Jen Wu3, Yun Wang3, Farida Grinberg1, Chang-Hoon Choi1, N. Jon Shah1,4,5,6, and Li-Wei Kuo2,7
1INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, 2Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Nanomedicine, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan, 3Center for Neuropsychiatric Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan, 4Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 5JARA – BRAIN – Translational Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 6Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 11, JARA, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, 7Institute of Medical Device and Imaging, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
Synopsis
It is known
that excess fluid as a result of vasogenic oedema formation
following stroke onset obscures the microstructural
characterisation of ischemic tissue by diffusion MRI. DTI-based free
water elimination and mapping (FWE) has been proposed as a technique
to potentially reduce the partial-volume effect. However, FWE
estimation is ill-conditioned, leading to inaccurate results. More
recently, it has been shown that the addition of a second dimension
spanned by transverse relaxation weighting, mitigates the
ill-conditioned problem. We aim here to investigate the latter model in
a longitudinal study of MCAo stroke animal models.
Introduction
Free-water
elimination (FWE) and mapping has been proposed to reduce the bias in
DTI metrics induced by the partial-volume effect with free water.1,2
FWE has been shown to be sensitive to the excess fluid in vasogenic
oedema in human brain tumours.1,2
Unfortunately, the FWE parameter estimation problem is
ill-conditioned.1,3
However, it has been demonstrated that the addition of a second
dimension, spanned by the transverse relaxation time weighting, T2
(FWET2),
mitigates the ill-conditioned problem.4,5
It has been
suggested that the pseudo-normalisation of DTI parameters, starting
around 24 hours after stroke onset, is mainly due to the
formation of vasogenic oedema.6,7
The aim of this study is to investigate the spatiotemporal evolution
of ischemic areas in stroke middle
cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo)
animal models using FWET2
and to evaluate its potential for the characterisation of tissue
microstructure in the presence of vasogenic oedema.Methods
Theory. The
model we adopt here assumes that the diffusion MRI signal originates
from two compartments with different transverse relaxation rates and
diffusivities. In the slow-exchange limit it reads as4 $$S_\mathrm{FWET_2}(T_\mathrm{E},b,\mathbf{n})=S_0[f_\mathrm{w}e^{-T_\mathrm{E}/T_{2,\mathrm{w}}}e^{-bD_\mathrm{w}}+(1-f_\mathrm{w})e^{-T_\mathrm{E}/T_{2,\mathrm{t}}}e^{-b\mathbf{n}^\mathrm{T}\mathbf{D}_\mathrm{t}\mathbf{n}}]\;\;\;(1)$$ where $$$S_0$$$
is the proton density, $$$f_\mathrm{w}$$$,
$$$T_{2,\mathrm{w}}$$$
and $$$D_\mathrm{w}$$$
are the fraction, transverse relaxation time and diffusion
coefficient of the free-water compartment and $$$T_\mathrm{2,t}$$$
and $$$\mathbf{D}_\mathrm{t}$$$
are the transverse relaxation time diffusion tensor for the tissue
compartment. The strength and direction of the diffusion weighting
gradient are $$$b$$$
and
$$$\mathbf{n}$$$, respectively,
and $$$T_\mathrm{E}$$$
is the echo-time. We assume that the vasogenic oedema can be modelled
by the isotropic, Gaussian compartment.1,2
Animal model.
Nine adult, male Sprague–Dawley rats, weighting 350-450 g, were
used. All procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use
Committee, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan. After the
pre-stroke scans, rats underwent the MCAo for 90 minutes as
described previously.12
Three
groups of animals were measured at the following time points:
group1{pre,1h,23h,45h,23d} (3 animals); group 2 {pre,11h,33h,23d} (2
animals); group 3 {pre,1d,3d,4d,5d,6d,7d,10d} (4 animals) (h=hours;
d=days).
MRI
experiments.
Experiments were performed on a home-integrated 3T whole-body MRI
scanner
including
an ultra-high-strength gradient coil with a maximum strength of 675
mT/m.8
A custom-designed, single-loop transmit/receive surface coil was
utilised.
A
Stejskal-Tanner, segmented EPI pulse sequence was implemented
in-house. Experimental parameters were: TE=50ms
and 100ms; b-values(directions)
= 0(16), 0.5(24) and 1.0(52) ms/µm2;
diffusion gradient separation and duration, Δ=24ms
and δ=3ms.
Additionally, four more echo-times, TE=70,90,110,130ms
(8 repetitions) were acquired. Other parameters were
voxel-size=0.26×0.26×13mm3;
matrix-size=96×96×20; repetition-time, TR=9s.
A turbo spin-echo sequence was used to acquire structural images.
Protocol parameters were: TR=4s;
TE=68ms;
voxel-size=0.13×0.13×1mm3;
matrix-size=192×192×20.
Data
analysis.
Following denoising9
and EPI and eddy-current distortion correction,10
all datasets were analysed using conventional DTI with an explicit,
monoexponential T2
attenuation (DTIT2),
where the signal is given by: $$$S_\mathrm{DTIT_2}(T_\mathrm{E},b,\mathbf{n})=S_0e^{-T_\mathrm{E}/T_2}e^{-b\mathbf{n}^\mathrm{T}\mathbf{Dn}}$$$.
DTIT2
model parameters were estimated using the weighted-linear
least-squares estimator. FWET2
model parameters were then estimated using the non-linear
least-squares estimator, with the DTIT2
parameters as the initial guess. All estimations were performed using
in-house Matlab scripts. Free water parameters were fixed to: $$$T_{2,\mathrm{w}}
= 1.25\;\mathrm{s}$$$ and $$$D_\mathrm{w}
= 3\;\mathrm{μm^2/ms}$$$.11Results and discussions
Fig. 1 shows
DTIT2
and FWET2
maps for three selected time points for one representative animal
from group 2 (a-c) and one representative animal from group 3 (d-f),
as an example. A reduction of MD and FA, together with an increase in
$$$T_2$$$,
is observed up to 33 h after occlusion (Figs. 1a,b,d). Here, the
difference between DTIT2
and FWET2
is minor, except for a slight increase in the free water fraction,
$$$f_\mathrm{w}$$$,
in the white matter (WM) at the ipsi-lateral side (red arrows,
Figs.1a,b). At five days (Fig.1e) MD and $$$T_2$$$
tend to re-normalise (black arrows) and $$$f_\mathrm{w}$$$
in WM increases further. At 10 days (Fig.1f) MD and $$$T_2$$$
from DTIT2
tend to increase. However, this is mostly due to the presence of
excess fluid, which is reflected by the increase in $$$f_\mathrm{w}$$$
(zoomed maps, Fig.2a) and becomes more heterogeneous. At 23 days
(Fig.1c), MD and $$$T_2$$$
from DTIT2
show much higher values, which is reflected by the increase in $$$f_\mathrm{w}$$$
(red arrows, Fig.2b). MD and $$$T_2$$$
from FWET2,
which are not contaminated by free water, show much closer values to
the contra-lateral side.
Fig. 3 shows
the group-averaged temporal evolution of MD (a,b), FA (c,d), $$$T_2$$$
(e,f) and $$$f_\mathrm{w}$$$
(g,h) for both DTIT2
(blue) and FWET2
(red), for groups 2 (a,c,e,g) and 3 (b,d,f,h). During the acute
phase, MD and FA are reduced and $$$T_2$$$
increases up to 33 hours after occlusion. Here the difference between
DTIT2
and FWET2
is not significant. At three days, DTIT2
parameters start showing increasing differences. These differences
are partly reflected by the increase in $$$f_\mathrm{w}$$$
(Figs. 3g,h), leading to a reduction in MD and $$$T_2$$$
from FWET2.Conclusions
We
demonstrated the application of FWET2
for the investigation of the spatiotemporal evolution of ischemic
lesions in MCAo stroke animal models. We found that, starting at
nearly 3 days after stroke onset, the increase in excess
fluid in the affected area induces changes in diffusion and
relaxation parameters, which are reflected by the free water
parameter, $$$f_\mathrm{w}$$$.
Thus, FWET2
is potentially helpful to investigate the evolution of vasogenic oedema
and tissue-specific features, such as the ischemic penumbra and
tissue heterogeneity during the chronic phase.Acknowledgements
We thank Mrs Claire Rick for proof reading the manuscript.References
1. Pasternak
O, et al. Free Water Elimination and Mapping from Diffusion MRI.
Magn Reson Med 2009;62:717-730.
2. Pierpaoli
C, et al. Removing CSF Contamination in Brain DT-MRIs by Using a
Two-Compartment Tensor Model. Proc
Intl Soc Magn Reson Med.
2004;1215.
3. Hoy AR,
et al. Optimization of a free water elimination two-compartment model
for diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2014;103:323-333.
4. Collier
Q, et al. Solving the free water elimination estimation problem by
incorporating T2 relaxation properties. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med
2017;1783.
5. Farrher
E, et al. In vivo DTI-based free-water elimination with
T2-weighting. Proc
Intl Soc Magn Reson Med.
2018;1629.
6. Hui E,
et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of diffusional kurtosis, mean
diffusivity and perfusion changes in experimental stroke. Brain
Res.
2012;1451:100-9.
7. Knight
RA, et al. Temporal evolution of ischemic damage in rat brain
measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke.
1991;22(6):802-8.
8. Cho
K-H, et al. Development, integration and use of an
ultrahigh-strength gradient system on a human size 3T magnet for
small animal MRI. PLoS
ONE.
2019;14(6):e0217916.
9. Manjon
JV, et al. Adaptive Non-Local Means Denoising of MR Images with
Spatially Varying Noise Levels.
J Magn Reson Imag.
2010;31(1):192–203.
10.
Andersson J, et al. How to correct susceptibility distortions in
spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor
imaging. NeuroImage.
2003; 20(2):870–888.
11. Collier
Q, et al. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging With Free Water Elimination: A
Bayesian Estimation Approach. Magn
Reson Med.
2018;80(2):802-813.
12. Wu KJ,
et al. Transplantation of Human Placenta-Derived Multipotent Stem
Cells
Reduces
Ischemic Brain Injury in Adult Rats. Cell Transplantation.
2015;24(3):459–470.