Anouk van Rijn1, Alexander Leemans1, Geert Jan Biessels2, and Alberto de Luca 1
1Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
DTI metrics
are often used without assessing the goodness of fit of the estimation model.
We investigated local changes in fit residuals induced by pathology. To this
end, a template of expected normalized residuals was created with 10 healthy
controls, then voxel-wise comparisons were performed against the residuals of
subjects affected by dementia. Results show that the residuals of infarcted
regions are significantly different as compared to healthy tissue, whereas no
differences were observed in hyperintensities. The fit residuals of the DTI
model can be used to complement the information of DTI metrics at detecting
microstructural changes in brain lesions.
Introduction
Fit
residuals can be used to quantify the goodness of fit of a chosen model to
measured signals as, for instance, the diffusion tensor model (DTI) in
diffusion MRI1. However, common DTI metrics, as the fractional
anisotropy (FA) and the mean diffusivity (MD), are often used without quantifying
the appropriateness of the model. In this study, we investigated whether the
residuals computed from a DTI fit can be used to complement DTI metrics to
detect the microstructural changes in the brain induced by neurodegenerative and vascular pathology in patients from a memory
clinic.Methods
We used data of ten controls and ten patients (mean
age 79.2 ± 7 years, 50% male) with amnestic
mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) and early stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD) collected
from the Memory clinic of the University Medical Center Utrecht. Data
consisted of 46 volumes
(1 b=0s/mm2, 45 b=1200s/mm2, TE=73ms, TR=6638ms, voxel-size 1.7x1.7x2.5mm3). The datasets also
include T1w images with voxel-size 1x1x1mm3, which
were annotated by a clinical specialist to delineate eventual white matter
hyperintensities (WMHs) and infarcts. dMRI data were corrected using ExploreDTI2
for subject motion, eddy currents, and EPI deformations including B-matrix
adjustments3. The diffusion tensor was computed using robust extraction of
kurtosis indices with linear estimation (REKINDLE)4 to obtain the FA, MD, and mean residuals metrics. Tissue
segmentation maps were determined by the Computational Anatomy Toolbox (CAT)
with a probability threshold of 95%. The
mean residuals can be written as: $$ R=\frac{1}{K}\sum_{k=1}^{K} \mid \normalsize DWI_{obs}^{k} \normalsize - DWI_{mod}^{k} \mid $$
with K being the number of DW volumes, DWIobs
the observed signal, and DWImod the modeled signal: $$DWI_{mod}^{k}=DWI^{0}e^{-B_{k}D_{fit}}$$
DWI0 is the non-DW image, Bk the B-matrices,
and Dfit the fitted diffusion tensor. The mean residuals were normalized by DWI0
per voxel. We investigated whether DTI residuals can
identify voxels were the goodness of fit of the DTI model is significantly
different than in healthy tissue by performing a voxel-wise comparison of the residuals
between controls and patients. To this end, T1w images of ten healthy controls were non-linearly registered5
to the MNI-152 T1 template6, then the mean residuals maps were
co-registered and their average/standard deviation computed. Before a z-test
was performed, the mean residuals of the patients were smoothed with a 5mm full
width at half maximum Gaussian filter. The procedure, shown in Figure 1, was also performed for analysis of the FA and MD. Finally, false discovery
rate (FDR) correction was applied (uncorrected p-value<0.05)7. As an additional
correction, only clusters of size greater than 50 voxels were retained. The
images showing the significant differences were superimposed as color overlays
on the T1w images in the template space.Results
Figure
2 shows the mean residuals, FA and MD values of example axial slices of two patients.
The first results (upper four rows) show that the mean residuals
and the MD are changed within a cortical infarct as compared to the surrounding
tissue. The second example shows that a WMH is
characterized by changes in FA and MD, but no clear changes in the
mean residuals. The significant results of a comparison between a patient and the
atlas are shown in Figure 3 and 4. Significantly different FA and MD values but
not residuals are revealed in a WMH. Conversely, microstructural
changes in a cortical infarct are captured by the mean residuals but not by FA and MD changes, in
analogy to Figure 2. Figure 5 shows the statistical distribution of FA, MD and
residuals as violin plots for different regions-of-interest (ROIs). A decrease is shown in the residuals
for all ROIs compared to the surrounding tissue, especially for the cortical
infarct, and the variance of the ROIs is smaller. The FA reveals more isotropic results for the ROIs,
especially for the lacunar infarct, but also overlap with the FA in the
surrounding tissue. An increase in the MD is shown especially in both the
infarcts.Discussion
In
this study, we have shown that DTI residuals can complement the information of
DTI metrics to describe microstructural changes induced by pathology, as WMHs and infarcts. The mean residuals show no clear significant
differences in the regions of WMHs, implying that the goodness of fit of the
DTI model in WMHs is comparable to that in healthy tissue, and that the
observed changes in FA and MD are likely to be genuine. Conversely, the mean
residuals in the region of the infarct do show significant differences, suggesting
caution in interpreting changes in DTI metrics in these regions. A drawback of
the method used, voxel-wise analysis, is the chance on detecting false
positives. As a result of the multiple corrections applied, it is possible that
less microstructural changes were detected by residuals, for example a lacunar
infarct which often spans a few voxels. Furthermore, the MNI atlas defines a standard
anatomy which is structurally different from our dataset of elderly with
dementia, involving loss of hippocampal volume and changes in ventricular
shape. Conclusions
The
fit residuals of the DTI model can be used to detect microstructural changes
induced by pathology, raising awareness on the reliability of any detected
change in DTI metrics, and potentially allowing to distinguish between
different lesion types.Acknowledgements
References
1. Kristoffersen, A. (2011). Statistical
assessment of non‐Gaussian diffusion models. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 66(6),
1639-1648.
2. Leemans, A. J. B. S. J. J. D. K., Jeurissen, B., Sijbers, J., & Jones, D. K. (2009, April). ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data. In Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med (Vol. 17, p. 3537).
3.
Leemans, A.,
& Jones, D. K. (2009). The B‐matrix must be
rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 61(6), 1336-1349.
4.
Tax, C. M., Otte, W. M., Viergever, M. A.,
Dijkhuizen, R. M., & Leemans, A. (2015). REKINDLE: robust extraction of kurtosis INDices with linear
estimation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 73(2),
794-808.
5.
Klein, S., Staring, M., Murphy, K., Viergever,
M. A., & Pluim, J. P. (2009). Elastix: a
toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE
transactions on medical imaging, 29(1), 196-205.
6.
Collins, D. L.,
Neelin, P., Peters, T. M., & Evans, A. C. (1994). Automatic 3D intersubject
registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. Journal of
computer assisted tomography, 18(2), 192-205.
7. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289-300.