Xin Tang1, Jun Xie2, Guobin Li2, Meng Jiang3, and Chenxi Hu4
1Department of Medical Information Engineering, Wuyuzhang honors college, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, 2United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China, 3Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 4Institute of Medical Imaging Technology, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
A novel method was
proposed to accelerate apparent-diffusion-coefficient(ADC)
mapping to shorten the EPI echo-train and/or improve resolution. The method was
based on SUPER--a Cartesian k-space undersampling strategy for parametric
mapping acceleration—and adapted to account for the nonlinear phase variation
in diffusion-weighted imaging at different b-values. In healthy subjects, the
phase-corrected SUPER(R=2) and SUPER-SENSE(combining SUPER and parallel
imaging, R=4) demonstrated similar image quality, reasonable noise
amplification, and similar reconstruction time compared with the non-acceleration
gold standard, despite a 2-fold and 4-fold reduction of reconstruction data.
This suggests that SUPER is a practical and accurate approach for accelerating
ADC mapping.
Introduction
Diffusion
weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ADC) mapping are
important diagnostic imaging tools for various diseases including stroke1 and cancer2, 3. Compared with DWI, ADC mapping is quantitative
but requires a longer scan time. Parallel imaging4, 5 is a common in-plane acceleration method, but the
acceleration rate is often limited by g-factor. Compressed sensing6 is technically challenging for diffusion
imaging, potentially due to the difficulty of incorporating random k-space
sampling into EPI, and incurrence of eddy currents. SUPER (Shift
Undersampling improves Parametric mapping Efficiency and Resolution) is a novel
acceleration method for parametric mapping7. In particular, SUPER is based on uniform
k-space undersampling and thus more robust against eddy currents. Here we
propose a modified SUPER method to accelerate ADC mapping in the presence of
nonlinear phase evolution, and demonstrate its performance in 6 healthy
subjects.Methods
A detailed description of SUPER can be found in Ref 7. In brief, SUPER treats each
contrast-weighted image in a parametric mapping task as a separate “coil”, and
leverages the methodology of parallel imaging to accelerate parametric mapping.
At each b-value, the signal acquired with SUPER is aliased from spatially modulated
signals at voxels uniformly spaced along the phase-encoding direction. The
aliasing is similar to that of Cartesian SENSE4, but with nonlinear “coil sensitivity”
and spatial modulation yielded by interleaved undersampling:$$\textrm{Eq 1}:{y_{ml}} = \sum\limits_{r = 0}^{R - 1} {{w_{rl}}s_{mr}^0\left( {M{0_r}\exp ( - {b_l} \cdot AD{C_r} + i{\psi _{rl}})} \right)}$$where
$$${R}$$$ is the reduction rate, $$${w_{rl}} = \frac{1}{R}\exp (\frac{{2\pi irl}}{R})$$$ the
modulation7 of the $$${r}$$$th
voxel, $$$s_{mr}^0$$$ the
sensitivity of the $$$m$$$th coil
at the $$$r$$$th voxel, and $$${\psi _{rl}}$$$ the
phase at the $$$r$$$th voxel, which changes nonlinearly for each b-value due
to eddy currents8 and bulk motion9, 10.The
goal is to estimate M0 and ADC from the aliased data $$${y_{ml}}$$$.
Phase
correction is needed for accurate estimation of ADC/M0 using $$$\textrm{Eq 1}$$$. In this work, we developed a phase-correction method for SUPER based on the
coil-mapping strategy developed by McKenzie et al11(Figure 1). Specifically, $$$\exp (i{\psi _l})$$$ in $$$\textrm{Eq 1}$$$ was
measured by acquiring 24 central k-space lines for each b-value, and dividing the
corresponding low-resolution image acquired from each coil by the
sum-of-squares image from all coils11.This
was a valid approach given the assumption that phase mainly resides in the
central part of k-space. This method generates an augmented coil map $$${s_{ml}}$$$, which is composed of static coil map $$$s_m^0$$$ and
the dynamic phase:$$\textrm{Eq 2}:{s_{ml}} = s_m^0 \cdot \exp (i{\psi _l})$$Substituting
$$$\textrm{Eq 2}$$$ into $$$\textrm{Eq 1}$$$ leads to$$\textrm{Eq 3}:{y_{ml}} = \sum\limits_{r = 0}^{R - 1} {{w_{rl}}{s_{mlr}} \cdot (M{0_r}\exp ( - {b_l} \cdot AD{C_r}))}$$which can be easily
solved with a least-squares criterion.
Imaging:
Six healthy subjects (age 26±4, 3 male) were scanned in a 3T scanner (uMR790, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China) after providing written informed consent, with a
diffusion-weighted spin-echo EPI sequence using a 24-channel (17 used in
acquisition) head coil. Eight
axial slices were imaged in the upper-to-mid brain with FOV of 240×240mm2,image
size 80×80, and slice-thickness 5mm.Five
b-values were used: b=0, 200, 400, 600, and 800sec/mm2. Other
parameters were: TR/TE/bandwidth/NEX/interpolation/flip-angle =
4000ms/86ms/1790Hz/pixel/1/2/90°. k-Space data was retrospectively undersampled
for ADC mapping based on non-acceleration, SENSE (R=2), SUPER (R=2), and
SUPER-SENSE (combined SUPER and parallel imaging, R=4). Data along 3 diffusion-encoding
directions was averaged to form the final ADC/M0 maps. Non-accelerated reconstruction was considered the gold standard for image quality assurance.
Results
Figure 2 ows representative ADC and M0 maps in 5 slices of 1 healthy subject. All 3 acceleration methods achieved similar image quality compared with non-accelerated method. Figure 3 shows the ADC
maps from the central slice in all 6 subjects, and the fractional
ADC-difference maps for 3 acceleration methods, calculated by
(ADC_acc–ADC_nonacc)/ADC_nonacc. SUPER showed less aliasing artifacts compared
to SENSE, potentially due to inaccurate coil mapping caused by imperfect EPI
ghost correction12. SUPER-SENSE showed mild noise and aliasing artifacts with a reasonable image quality.Notably, even very
small features in the brain were well preserved in the SUPER-SENSE maps.
Figure
4 shows comparison of bias and standard deviation between the acceleration
methods. There was small bias in ADC and slightly larger bias in M0 for all
methods. SUPER led to better accuracy and precision than SENSE under all
criteria, and this is remarkable considering that SUPER only had 5 effective “coils”
while SENSE had 17. Figure 5 shows retrospectively synthesized DWI images from
the 3 acceleration methods, which were all similar to the raw images. The
average computational time per voxel for non-acceleration, SENSE, SUPER, and
SUPER-SENSE was 3.0ms, 3.8ms, 2.8ms, and 3.0ms, respectively, which are similar between all methods.Conclusions
We demonstrated a
novel development and application of SUPER for accelerating ADC mapping. SUPER with phase correction achieved better
image quality compared to SENSE even with less “coils”, suggesting a better
conditioning of the underlying inverse problem. SUPER-SENSE at 4-fold
acceleration demonstrated reasonable image quality and noise amplification. The
reduced echo-train with SUPER and SUPER-SENSE may improve SNR and EPI distortion,
and may also be traded-off for higher image resolution. Although further
investigation involving prospective undersampling is needed, the preliminary
data suggests that SUPER is a practical and accurate approach for accelerating ADC
mapping.Acknowledgements
The
authors would like to thank Zhaopeng Li at Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare for
helpful discussions on DWI data preprocessing.References
1. Roberts TPL, Rowley HA. Diffusion weighted
magnetic resonance imaging in stroke. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45(3):185-194.
2. White NS, McDonald C, Farid N, et al.
Diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer: physical foundations and applications of
restriction spectrum imaging. Cancer Res. 2014;74(17):4638-4652.
3. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al.
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus
and recommendations. Neoplasia. 2009;11(2):102-125.
4. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB,
et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magnetic resonance in
medicine. 1999;42(5):952-962.
5. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et
al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).
Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2002;47(6):1202-1210.
6. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI:
The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magnetic resonance
in medicine. 2007;58.
7. Hu C, Peters DC. SUPER: A blockwise
curve-fitting method for accelerating MR parametric mapping with fast
reconstruction. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2019;81(6):3515-3529.
8. Van AT, Cervantes B, Kooijman H, et al.
Analysis of phase error effects in multishot diffusion-prepared turbo spin echo
imaging. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2017;7(2):238-250.
9. Bammer R, Holdsworth S, Aksoy M, et al.
Phase errors in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
2010.
10. Elsaid NMH, Prince JL, Roys S, et al. Phase
Image Texture Analysis for Motion Detection in Diffusion MRI (PITA-MDD).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019;62:228-241.
11. McKenzie CA, Yeh EN, Ohliger MA, et al.
Self-calibrating parallel imaging with automatic coil sensitivity extraction.
Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2002;47(3):529-538.
12. Xie VB, Lyu M, Wu EX. EPI Nyquist ghost and
geometric distortion correction by two-frame phase labeling. Magn Reson Med.
2017;77(5):1749-1761.