4352

Acceleration of diffusion ADC mapping with phase-corrected SUPER
Xin Tang1, Jun Xie2, Guobin Li2, Meng Jiang3, and Chenxi Hu4
1Department of Medical Information Engineering, Wuyuzhang honors college, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, 2United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China, 3Department of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 4Institute of Medical Imaging Technology, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Synopsis

A novel method was proposed to accelerate apparent-diffusion-coefficient(ADC) mapping to shorten the EPI echo-train and/or improve resolution. The method was based on SUPER--a Cartesian k-space undersampling strategy for parametric mapping acceleration—and adapted to account for the nonlinear phase variation in diffusion-weighted imaging at different b-values. In healthy subjects, the phase-corrected SUPER(R=2) and SUPER-SENSE(combining SUPER and parallel imaging, R=4) demonstrated similar image quality, reasonable noise amplification, and similar reconstruction time compared with the non-acceleration gold standard, despite a 2-fold and 4-fold reduction of reconstruction data. This suggests that SUPER is a practical and accurate approach for accelerating ADC mapping.

Introduction

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ADC) mapping are important diagnostic imaging tools for various diseases including stroke1 and cancer2, 3. Compared with DWI, ADC mapping is quantitative but requires a longer scan time. Parallel imaging4, 5 is a common in-plane acceleration method, but the acceleration rate is often limited by g-factor. Compressed sensing6 is technically challenging for diffusion imaging, potentially due to the difficulty of incorporating random k-space sampling into EPI, and incurrence of eddy currents. SUPER (Shift Undersampling improves Parametric mapping Efficiency and Resolution) is a novel acceleration method for parametric mapping7. In particular, SUPER is based on uniform k-space undersampling and thus more robust against eddy currents. Here we propose a modified SUPER method to accelerate ADC mapping in the presence of nonlinear phase evolution, and demonstrate its performance in 6 healthy subjects.

Methods

A detailed description of SUPER can be found in Ref 7. In brief, SUPER treats each contrast-weighted image in a parametric mapping task as a separate “coil”, and leverages the methodology of parallel imaging to accelerate parametric mapping. At each b-value, the signal acquired with SUPER is aliased from spatially modulated signals at voxels uniformly spaced along the phase-encoding direction. The aliasing is similar to that of Cartesian SENSE4, but with nonlinear “coil sensitivity” and spatial modulation yielded by interleaved undersampling:$$\textrm{Eq 1}:{y_{ml}} = \sum\limits_{r = 0}^{R - 1} {{w_{rl}}s_{mr}^0\left( {M{0_r}\exp ( - {b_l} \cdot AD{C_r} + i{\psi _{rl}})} \right)}$$where $$${R}$$$ is the reduction rate, $$${w_{rl}} = \frac{1}{R}\exp (\frac{{2\pi irl}}{R})$$$ the modulation7 of the $$${r}$$$th voxel, $$$s_{mr}^0$$$ the sensitivity of the $$$m$$$th coil at the $$$r$$$th voxel, and $$${\psi _{rl}}$$$ the phase at the $$$r$$$th voxel, which changes nonlinearly for each b-value due to eddy currents8 and bulk motion9, 10.The goal is to estimate M0 and ADC from the aliased data $$${y_{ml}}$$$.

Phase correction is needed for accurate estimation of ADC/M0 using $$$\textrm{Eq 1}$$$. In this work, we developed a phase-correction method for SUPER based on the coil-mapping strategy developed by McKenzie et al11(Figure 1). Specifically, $$$\exp (i{\psi _l})$$$ in $$$\textrm{Eq 1}$$$ was measured by acquiring 24 central k-space lines for each b-value, and dividing the corresponding low-resolution image acquired from each coil by the sum-of-squares image from all coils11.This was a valid approach given the assumption that phase mainly resides in the central part of k-space. This method generates an augmented coil map $$${s_{ml}}$$$, which is composed of static coil map $$$s_m^0$$$ and the dynamic phase:$$\textrm{Eq 2}:{s_{ml}} = s_m^0 \cdot \exp (i{\psi _l})$$Substituting $$$\textrm{Eq 2}$$$ into $$$\textrm{Eq 1}$$$ leads to$$\textrm{Eq 3}:{y_{ml}} = \sum\limits_{r = 0}^{R - 1} {{w_{rl}}{s_{mlr}} \cdot (M{0_r}\exp ( - {b_l} \cdot AD{C_r}))}$$which can be easily solved with a least-squares criterion.

Imaging: Six healthy subjects (age 26±4, 3 male) were scanned in a 3T scanner (uMR790, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China) after providing written informed consent, with a diffusion-weighted spin-echo EPI sequence using a 24-channel (17 used in acquisition) head coil. Eight axial slices were imaged in the upper-to-mid brain with FOV of 240×240mm2,image size 80×80, and slice-thickness 5mm.Five b-values were used: b=0, 200, 400, 600, and 800sec/mm2. Other parameters were: TR/TE/bandwidth/NEX/interpolation/flip-angle = 4000ms/86ms/1790Hz/pixel/1/2/90°. k-Space data was retrospectively undersampled for ADC mapping based on non-acceleration, SENSE (R=2), SUPER (R=2), and SUPER-SENSE (combined SUPER and parallel imaging, R=4). Data along 3 diffusion-encoding directions was averaged to form the final ADC/M0 maps. Non-accelerated reconstruction was considered the gold standard for image quality assurance.

Results

Figure 2 ows representative ADC and M0 maps in 5 slices of 1 healthy subject. All 3 acceleration methods achieved similar image quality compared with non-accelerated method. Figure 3 shows the ADC maps from the central slice in all 6 subjects, and the fractional ADC-difference maps for 3 acceleration methods, calculated by (ADC_acc–ADC_nonacc)/ADC_nonacc. SUPER showed less aliasing artifacts compared to SENSE, potentially due to inaccurate coil mapping caused by imperfect EPI ghost correction12. SUPER-SENSE showed mild noise and aliasing artifacts with a reasonable image quality.Notably, even very small features in the brain were well preserved in the SUPER-SENSE maps.

Figure 4 shows comparison of bias and standard deviation between the acceleration methods. There was small bias in ADC and slightly larger bias in M0 for all methods. SUPER led to better accuracy and precision than SENSE under all criteria, and this is remarkable considering that SUPER only had 5 effective “coils” while SENSE had 17. Figure 5 shows retrospectively synthesized DWI images from the 3 acceleration methods, which were all similar to the raw images. The average computational time per voxel for non-acceleration, SENSE, SUPER, and SUPER-SENSE was 3.0ms, 3.8ms, 2.8ms, and 3.0ms, respectively, which are similar between all methods.

Conclusions

We demonstrated a novel development and application of SUPER for accelerating ADC mapping. SUPER with phase correction achieved better image quality compared to SENSE even with less “coils”, suggesting a better conditioning of the underlying inverse problem. SUPER-SENSE at 4-fold acceleration demonstrated reasonable image quality and noise amplification. The reduced echo-train with SUPER and SUPER-SENSE may improve SNR and EPI distortion, and may also be traded-off for higher image resolution. Although further investigation involving prospective undersampling is needed, the preliminary data suggests that SUPER is a practical and accurate approach for accelerating ADC mapping.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Zhaopeng Li at Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare for helpful discussions on DWI data preprocessing.

References

1. Roberts TPL, Rowley HA. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in stroke. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45(3):185-194.

2. White NS, McDonald C, Farid N, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer: physical foundations and applications of restriction spectrum imaging. Cancer Res. 2014;74(17):4638-4652.

3. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia. 2009;11(2):102-125.

4. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 1999;42(5):952-962.

5. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2002;47(6):1202-1210.

6. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2007;58.

7. Hu C, Peters DC. SUPER: A blockwise curve-fitting method for accelerating MR parametric mapping with fast reconstruction. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2019;81(6):3515-3529.

8. Van AT, Cervantes B, Kooijman H, et al. Analysis of phase error effects in multishot diffusion-prepared turbo spin echo imaging. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2017;7(2):238-250.

9. Bammer R, Holdsworth S, Aksoy M, et al. Phase errors in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging. 2010.

10. Elsaid NMH, Prince JL, Roys S, et al. Phase Image Texture Analysis for Motion Detection in Diffusion MRI (PITA-MDD). Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019;62:228-241.

11. McKenzie CA, Yeh EN, Ohliger MA, et al. Self-calibrating parallel imaging with automatic coil sensitivity extraction. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2002;47(3):529-538.

12. Xie VB, Lyu M, Wu EX. EPI Nyquist ghost and geometric distortion correction by two-frame phase labeling. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(5):1749-1761.

Figures

Figure 1. Outline of phase-corrected SUPER for acceleration of ADC mapping. Two sets of data were acquired at each b-value: the interleaved k-space undersampling provides data for reconstruction with SUPER, and the central k-space sampling provides data for generating augmented coil maps. The resultant aliased images and the augmented coil maps were substituted into Eq. 3, which was solved for each block of aliasing voxels to reconstruct the ADC and M0 maps.

Figure 2. Comparison of reconstructed ADC and M0 maps from non-acceleration (gold standard), SENSE (2-fold undersampling), SUPER (2-fold undersampling), and SUPER-SENSE (4-fold undersampling) in 5 slices of 1 healthy volunteer. All 3 acceleration methods achieved similar image quality compared with the gold standard despite reduction of reconstruction data.

Figure 3. Comparison of ADC maps from non-acceleration (gold standard), SENSE (2-fold undersampling), SUPER (2-fold undersampling), and SUPER-SENSE (4-fold undersampling) in the central slice of all 6 subjects. The left panel shows the ADC and right panel the fractional ADC-difference for each acceleration method. SUPER showed fewer aliasing artifacts compared with SENSE. SUPER-SENSE showed mild noise amplification and aliasing artifacts, with a reasonable image quality and map-SNR.

Figure 4. Comparison of bias and standard deviation of the fractional ADC and M0 difference. SUPER was superior to SENSE under almost every criterion, and this was remarkable since SENSE had 17 physical coils while SUPER only 5 “effective coils”. Note that SUPER-SENSE used only half of the data used by SUPER or SENSE, and thus incurred a sqrt(2) increase of noise standard deviation regardless of other causes.

Figure 5. Comparison of synthesized DWI images based on reconstructed ADC and M0 maps to the raw images acquired at b=0, 400, and 800sec/mm2. There were only very mild differences between the raw and synthesized images from both SUPER and SUPER-SENSE, despite each k-space was sampled with only a half and quarter of data, respectively.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28 (2020)
4352