Lei Guo1, Aurelien Destruel1, Mingyan Li1, Haiwei Chen1, Ewald Weber1, Feng Liu1, and Stuart Crozier1
1School of ITEE, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Synopsis
At ultra-high field (UHF) MRI, dipole-based
antennas have deeper field penetration but increased specific absorption rate
(SAR) levels than loop-type coils. In this work, a novel RF coil is proposed
based on layer-configured dipole and multiple radiating elements. The designed
RF coil is compared with a conventional dipole antenna in electromagnetic simulations
and it is observed that more than 30% SAR reduction can be achieved with
improved B1+ efficiency.
Introduction
Radiative dipole antennas are widely used
in multi-channels transmitting radio frequency (RF) coil designs at ultra-high
field (UHF) MRI because of their attractive features, such as the increased
field penetration and symmetric field 1-3. However, these advantages
are accompanied with drawbacks such as the concentrated $$$B_1^+$$$ field near the surface and high specific
absorption rate (SAR) level causing increased risk of RF-induced heating. To
reduce the SAR level, a slot dipole array was proposed 4. The slot antenna
has a similar radiation pattern compared with its complementary dipole antenna
but produces lower SAR distribution and improved $$$B_1^+$$$ efficiency. In this work, a novel RF coil is
designed using a dipole antenna with multiple radiating elements. Similarly to
slot antennas, the proposed RF coil can significantly reduce the SAR level, but
with the advantage of broadening the field distribution and homogeneity of the $$$B_1^+$$$ field distribution. Methods
Inspired by the classic Yagi-Uda antenna
array5, multiple radiating elements (MREs) were used in this work to build
the novel RF coil. As the MREs divide the coil current distribution into
several segments, the radiated electromagnetic (EM) wave and RF energy are
evenly distributed, and thus a flattened RF field pattern and reduced SAR level
can be achieved. The coil was designed with two layers (Fig. 1C) on opposing
sides of a dielectric substrate. The top side of the substrate is a
conventional dipole with two inductors, which are used to tune the resonant
frequency and reduce its electrical length (Fig. 1A). On the bottom side, a metal
structure with five slots enables the MREs, which were passively excited by the
conventional dipole (Fig. 1B). The concentrated electric field normally radiated
from the dipole can be distributed and re-radiated by the MREs. Because the SAR
level is in direct proportion to the electric field intensity, the distributed
electric field could significantly reduce the SAR concentration and flatten the
RF field pattern. The designed RF coil was fabricated using RO4360G2 substrate and
RO4460G2 prepreg with dielectric constant of 6.15 and total laminated thickness
of 9.65 mm. The dimensions of the coil were optimized in CST (Microwave Studio,
Darmstadt, Germany) to improve the matching of the coil, RF field pattern and
SAR level. The design was evaluated using a phantom with tissue-like properties
($$$\epsilon_{b}$$$=34 and $$$\sigma$$$=0.4) (Fig. 1C) and the
human voxel model Emma from the bio-model library in CST. The 10g-averaged peak
local SAR (SAR10g) and $$$B_1^+$$$ field were used to calculate the $$$B_1^+$$$ efficiency as $$$B_{1;eff}^+=B_1^+/\sqrt{max{SAR_{10g}}}$$$. A conventional dipole
antenna with lumped inductors was also simulated for comparison. The coils were
tuned to 297 MHz for 7T MRI, with inductor values of 21 nH for the proposed
design and 47 nH for the conventional dipole. The specific dimensions of the proposed
coil are shown in Fig. 1A-B while the length and width of the conventional
dipole antenna are 250 mm and 10 mm, respectively. Results and Discussion
The simulated $$$B_1^+$$$ efficiency and SAR10g distribution in
three planes (axial, coronal, and sagittal) are shown in Fig. 2A-B. The $$$B_1^+$$$ field was normalized to 1W of accepted power
at the excitation port. It can be seen that the penetration depth with respect
to $$$B_1^+$$$ efficiency was improved by using the MREs compared
with using a single dipole. The SAR10g was substantially reduced
especially close to the surface of the phantom. Figures 3 shows line plots extracted
from the dashed lines in Figure 2, to quantitatively compare the designs. It
can be observed that enhanced $$$B_1^+$$$ efficiency was achieved particularly at the
deeper region of the phantom (100-200 mm away from edges of the phantom). It
can also be seen that the SAR10g was reduced at the shallow region
of the phantom (maximum local SAR10g was reduced from 1.662 W/kg to 1.235
W/kg on the selected axial plane), where maximum SAR10g is typically
present. It is also worth mentioning that the maximum SAR10g in the entire
phantom volume was reduced from 1.85W/kg to 1.29W/kg which corresponds to
30.27% reduction. In addition to the comparison of $$$B_1^+$$$ field efficiency, $$$B_1^+$$$ intensity at the central point of phantom using
the same stimulated power of 1 W was also compared. Simulation results
indicated that the central $$$B_1^+$$$ intensity was 0.182 uT for the conventional
dipole while it was improved to 0.19 uT for the MREs coil. The Emma voxel model
from CST was further used to evaluate the performance of the proposed coil, and
the results are shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that the proposed
coil achieved higher $$$B_1^+$$$ efficiency at all the three planes than that
of the conventional dipole. The maximum global SAR10g of the
proposed coil (1.39 W/kg) had a 58% reduction compared to the conventional
dipole (3.3215 W/kg). Conclusion
A novel RF
coil was designed using a dipole with multiple radiating elements. Compared
with a conventional dipole, $$$B_1^+$$$ efficiency can be enhanced and the SAR10g
can be reduced.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Raaijmakers AJE, Ipek O, Klomp DWJ, Possanzini C,
Harvey PR, Lagendijk JJW, den Berg CAT. Design of a radiative surface coil
array element at 7 T: The single-side adapted dipole antenna. Magn Reson Med.
2011; 66:1488–1497.
2. Raaijmakers AJE, Italiaander M, Voogt IJ, Luijten
PR, Hoogduin JM, Klomp DWJ, van den Berg CAT. The fractionated dipole antenna:
A new antenna for body imaging at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2016; 75:1366–1374.
3. Oezerdem C, Winter L, Graessl A, Paul K, Els A,
Weinberger O, Rieger J, Kuehne A, Dieringer M, Hezel F, Voit D, Frahm J,
Niendorf T. 16-channel bow tie antenna transceiver array for cardiac MR at 7.0
tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2016; 75:2553–2565.
4. Alon L, Lattanzi R, Lakshmanan K, Brown R, Deniz
CM, Sodickson DK, Collins CM. Transverse slot antennas for high field MRI. Magn
Reson Med. 2018; 80:1233-1242.
5. Yagi H, Uda S. Projector of the sharpest beam of
electric waves. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy. 1926; 2: 49-52.