Viacheslav Ivanov1, Anna Hurshkainen1, Georgiy Solomakha1, and Mikhail Zubkov1
1Faculty of Physics and Engineering, ITMO University, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
Synopsis
We propose a double-coil setup for broad-range heteronuclear MRI. The
system designed for an 11.7T scanner comprises two independent coils, one of
them tuned to 1H frequency to perform anatomical imaging, and
another one, wire-array coil, tuned to the X-nucleus (including 2H, 11B,
13C, 23Na, 7Li
and 31P) frequency. In order to tune the X-coil over such a wide
range, both structural capacitance and inductance of the coil are made
variable; narrow range tuning of the 1H coil is achieved via
conventional tuning-matching circuit. The design principle and setup tunability
are investigated in simulations and experimentally.
Introduction
In MRI hydrogen nuclei (commonly referred to as
protons) are most often used to generate a detectable RF-signal. In addition to
hydrogen, several other nuclei present in living organisms provide the magnetic
resonance response. Heteronuclear MR measurements, i.e., experiments using
non-proton nuclei, termed X-nuclei, offer information which is complementary to
that of proton MRI1–4. A particular problem with
conventional coil design for heteronuclear imaging is the low tunability range
of the X-nucleus coil. This manifests in the coils being produced for single-
or dual-nuclei use only, thus severely limiting the applicability range of a
particular coil. This problem escalates
with the B0 growth as the absolute frequency gap between the Larmor frequencies of
two chosen nuclei increases.
Methods
We propose a double-coil setup to allow broad range heteronuclear
experiments: two independent coils, one of them tuned to 1H
frequency to obtain anatomical reference images, and another, a wire-array coil5,6, tunable to a broad range of X-nuclei frequency. 2H
and 31P frequencies were chosen as margin frequencies for the
X-nucleus coil. The frequency gap between these two nuclei Larmor frequencies
at 11.7 T is around 127 MHz (76-203 MHz).
The wire-array coil consists of 5
variable-length brass wires connecting two PCBs with 5 metallization strpis (or
patches) on each side of the wire (Figure 1, A). The patches serve as one plate
of the structural capacitance that provides coil tuning capability. The
opposing plates of the capacitors are formed by four PCBs fully metallized on
one side placed above and below the PCBs with patches, thus forming an array of
two parallel connected capacitances. The four outer boards can be moved
relative to each other to change the overlap between the middle PCB with
patches and outer PCBs, thus varying the total capacity. The variation in the
capacity attached to the wires changes the wire array eigenmode frequency
allowing the coil to be tuned to a particular Larmor frequency.
The second coil is a butterfly loop coil7 tuned to 500 MHz (Figure 1, B). It employs two variable
capacitors for tuning and matching. The coil is implemented as a double-sided PCB.
Such coil configuration was chosen because the RF magnetic field it produces is
predominantly directed orthogonally to the RF magnetic field produced by the
X-nuclei coil which serves to reduce the mutual coil coupling.
The radiofrequency coil design was simulated in
the CST Microwave Studio 2017. Simulations were performed in the presence of
the RF shield model and the phantom imitating average tissue properties of a
small animal8. After determining the system
parameters in simulation, a prototype of the
multi-nuclei coil was assembled (Figure 1, C) and on-bench measurements were made. To prove that the prototype can be
tuned to any frequency in the 76-203 MHz range, the coil resonant frequency
(measured by Keysight PNA E8362C VNA as the coil S11 parameter minimum
position) was recorded at different patch/plate overlap values. Next, to be
sure that the X-nuclei and 1H coils were decoupled S12 parameter
was measured at three different tunings of the X-nuclei coil (76, 125.7 and 203
MНz). Finally, the field distributions at the same frequencies were obtained
experimentally.
Results
Simulation results and experimental
measurements of the system tuning capability are presented in Figure 2, A. Tuning curves in Figure 2, B show that the proposed X-nuclei RF-coil can
be tuned to any frequency in the target 76-203 MHz range with various fields of
view.
The anticipated coil decoupling due to RF
fields orthogonality was confirmed by calculated and measured S12
parameters of the complete double-coil setup for three X-nuclei coil geometries
corresponding to three different system tuning frequencies. S11
value at 1H frequency (Figure 3) was below -30 dB, and the S22 value
at the X-nuclei frequencies was below -12 dB for all three tested frequencies.
S12 value at 1H and X-nuclei frequencies in all three
tuning configurations was below -30 dB.
The magnetic field distribution for both coils
was obtained in simulations and experimentally. Here we demonstrate the field
components for the X-nuclei coil and the proton coil (Figure 4).
Discussion
The designed dual coil setup allows generating
the excitation RF-field and acquisition of signals from protons as well as from
several biologically important nuclei at 11.7 T. The latter include 2H
(76.753 MHz), 13C (125.721 MHz), 23Na (132.256 MHz), 129Xe
(138.302 MHz) and 31P (202.404 MHz).
The S-parameter measurements have shown the
butterfly coil to be uncoupled from the X-nuclei coil. This allows independent
tuning of the two coils, and thus provides a convenient way to obtain both the
reference anatomical 1H images and functional X-nucleus images on
the seleсted frequency.
Field distribution for both coils was shown to
provide large enough FoV for whole-body small-animal imaging. However, the
exact imaging volume has to be determined with animal scanning in an actual MRI
scanner.
Conclusions
A novel RF-coil design was introduced allowing
performing heteronuclear MR-imaging on several different X-nuclei using a
single coil assembly. This prospectively removes the need to interfere with the
animal, when acquiring multiple X-nuclei datasets, thus promising better
precision and diversity of heteronuclear imaging.Acknowledgements
This work
was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (Project 19-75-10104).References
1. Robinson SP, Boogaart A van den, Maxwell RJ, Griffiths
JR, Hamilton E, Waterton JC. 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and 2H-magnetic resonance imaging studies of a panel of early-generation
transplanted murine tumour models. Br J Cancer 1998; 77: 1752–1760.
2. Kurhanewicz J,
Vigneron DB, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Bankson JA, Brindle K, Cunningham CH et
al. Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: Path to Clinical Translation in Oncology. Neoplasia
2019; 21: 1–16.
3. Madelin G, Regatte
RR. Biomedical applications of sodium MRI in vivo. Journal of Magnetic
Resonance Imaging 2013; 38: 511–529.
4. Mugler JP, Altes TA.
Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI of the human lung. Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Imaging 2013; 37: 313–331.
5. Hurshkainen A,
Nikulin A, Georget E, Larrat B, Berrahou D, Neves AL et al. A novel
metamaterial-inspired RF-coil for preclinical dual-nuclei MRI. Scientific
Reports 2018; 8: 9190.
6. Zubkov M, Hurshkainen
AA, Brui EA, Glybovski SB, Gulyaev MV, Anisimov NV et al. Small-animal,
whole-body imaging with metamaterial-inspired RF coil. NMR in Biomedicine
2018; 31: e3952.
7. Kumar A, Bottomley
PA. Optimized quadrature surface coil designs. Magn Reson Mater Phy
2007; 21: 41.
8. Kraszewski A, Stuchly
MA, Stuchly SS, Smith AM. In vivo and in vitro dielectric properties of animal
tissues at radio frequencies. Bioelectromagnetics 1982; 3: 421–432.