Magdoom Kulam Najmudeen1, Malisa Sarntinoranont2, and Thomas H Mareci2
1SQITS/NICHD, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States, 2University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
Synopsis
A new gradient pattern is introduced for performing pre-emphasis by uniform bandlimited
excitation of eddy current and mechanical eigenmodes of the gradient system. The presented pattern is shown to be more effective in eliciting the gradient response than the energy equivalent trapezoidal pulse.
This approach may
allow the design of gradient waveforms that reduce artifacts in PFG experiments, e.g. measuring very slow diffusion and flow.
Introduction
For
pulsed field gradient experiments, characterizing gradient switching is
important for correcting errors in the gradient moments caused by eddy currents
and mechanical oscillations. Errors in gradient moments result in image
distortions in k-space and inaccuracies in q-space imaging, especially while
measuring both very low diffusivities and flow velocities. Current methods to improve gradient fidelity typically involve
mapping the time dependent magnetic field generated following a trapezoidal or
triangular test gradient pulse. Assuming the gradient system is linear and time
invariant (LTI), the measured field is then modeled using a decaying
multi-exponential function to obtain the pre-emphasis parameters used to
overdrive the gradient amplifier [1].
It is well known that accurate characterization
of an LTI system requires the input function (i.e. time derivative of a test gradient
pulse) mimic that of an impulse function which excites all the frequencies
(i.e. gradient eigenmodes) uniformly followed by immediate reception. The
trapezoidal or triangular pulse currently used in literature has a non-uniform
sinc type excitation [see Figure 1], adding bias in the measurement. We introduce
a new test gradient pattern, called the Tukey
windowed shifted sine integral (twSSI) pulse [see Figure 2], whose derivative is a shifted sinc
function, which has a bandlimited uniform spectrum like the impulse function
with an adjustable excitation time to enable reception immediately after
excitation. Methods
MRI
measurements used a 330 mm inner diameter (ID) Oxford 4.7 T horizontal bore
magnet and Agilent VNMRS imaging console, controlled by VnmrJ3.1A software
(Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), with RRI BFG-200/115-S14 gradients
(Resonance Research, Billerica, MA), which has 80 mm diameter linear spherical
volume, driven by IECO GPA-400-750 3-axis gradient amplifiers (International
Electric Co., Helsinki, Finland) and transmit-receive 88 mm ID custom
quadrature birdcage RF coil. Measurements were performed after zeroing gradient
pre-emphasis settings.
Measurements were performed on 0.6%
hydrogel (w/v), in a 66 mm ID round bottom flask, doped with 27 mM copper
sulfate pentahydrate to reduce the T1/T2 relaxation
times. A 3D multi-echo gradient echo imaging sequence was modified by adding the
twSSI pulse with a variable delay time before RF excitation to measure the
residual magnetic field after the pulse. The gradient response was measured using
TR = 250 ms, TE = 0.3 ms, echo spacing = 0.5 ms and 24 echoes with a twSSI
gradient pulse duration of 4 ms, excitation bandwidth of 4 kHz and peak
gradient amplitudes of 480, 300, 240 mT/m on x, y and z gradients,
respectively, chosen to prevent phase wrapping. The delay between the twSSI
pulse and imaging sequence ranged from 0.05-0.45 ms in steps of 0.1 ms to
obtain a field sampling frequency of 10 kHz for a total duration of 12.27 ms.
The field-of-view was 66 mm x 66 mm x 66 mm to
encompass the whole spherical volume, in a matrix of 32 x 32 x 32. The measurement was repeated twice
for assessing the temporal stability and reproducibility of the pre-emphasis
parameters. For comparison, the gradient response was measured using a
trapezoidal pulse of identical duration with the peak gradient strength
adjusted such that the root-mean-square current was the same as the twSSI pulse
resulting in 200, 125, 100 mT/m with ramp times equal to 36, 24, 20 μs on x, y, z gradients, respectively.
This prevents temperature changes in the gradient coil from altering the
response [2].
The 3D time varying residual magnetic field map for
each gradient axis was obtained from the phase resulting from complex dividing
the four Hadamard encoded images (Table 24.1 in [3]) acquired at each delay time. The resulting magnetic field was fit to a
trilinear equation in space to account for the constant and gradient fields
generated after the test pulse whose strengths were then fit to a decaying oscillatory
multi-exponential model in time to obtain the eddy current amplitudes/time
constants and mechanical response.Results & Discussion
In Figure 3, the
modeled time-dependence of the fields generated after the twSSI pulse is shown for
the two repeated measurements showing temporal stability of the gradient system.
The results of the model fit for the y-gradient obtained using twSSI and
trapezoidal pulses are shown in Table 1. The results show that the twSSI pulse
was able to elicit both strong direct and weak cross terms in the eddy currents
along with the mechanical oscillations as exhibited by high goodness of fit
measure, R2, compared to the trapezoidal pulse. The similarity of model
fit across both the repetitions shows reproducibility of pre-emphasis
parameters. For the tested gradient system, the direct gradient eddy current
amplitude was orders of magnitude higher compared to the mechanical
oscillations. However, the mechanical oscillations lasted longer than the eddy
currents. Conclusion
We
have presented a method to characterize gradient switching by uniform bandlimited
excitation of gradient eigenmodes using a twSSI gradient pulse pattern. This
approach may allow the design of gradient excitation patterns that reduce eddy
current artifacts in PFG experiments, e.g. measuring very slow diffusion and
flow. After applying optimal pre-emphasis to the gradient amplifier control,
measurement of the remaining residual eddy current response will allow further
improvements through the design of the pulsed gradient waveform to overcome
these residual fields.Acknowledgements
A portion of this work was performed in the
Advanced MRI/S (AMRIS) Facility at the McKnight Brain Institute of the
University of Florida, which is part of the National High Magnetic Field
Laboratory (supported by National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement DMR-1157490,
the State of Florida, and the U.S. Department of Energy). In addition, this
work is supported in part by the NIH/NCATS Clinical and Translational Science
Award UL1 TR000064.References
[1] M. A. Bernstein, K. F. King, and X. J.
Zhou, Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Elsevier, 2004.
[2] J.
Busch, S. J. Vannesjo, C. Barmet, K. P. Pruessmann, and S. Kozerke, “Analysis
of temperature dependence of background phase errors in phase-contrast cardiovascular
magnetic resonance,” J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 97,
Dec. 2014.
[3] R.
W. Brown, Y. N. Cheng, and E. M. Haacke, Magnetic Resonance Imaging :
Physical Principles and Sequence Design. Chichester, UK: John Wiley &
Sons Ltd, 2014.