Niklas Wehkamp1, Philipp Rovedo1, Elmar Fischer1, Jürgen Hennig1, and Maxim Zaitsev1
1Radiology - Medical Physics, Medical Center - University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Synopsis
Manipulating the Larmor frequency of a
frequency-adjustable 1H field probe provides interesting new
possibilities to excite and record the probe’s signal. Here, we
present first proof-of-concept experiments that demonstrate the
feasibility of selective off-resonant excitation of the probe. Free
induction decays with the applied resonance offset current were
recorded and characterized.
Purpose
Magnetic field probes offer a great promise
to improve MRI measurements.[1] Hydrogen-based field probes provide
the highest signal but can interfere with the imaging process.
Therefore, fluorine, deuterium or chemically-shifted field probes
have been proposed.[2,3] This work presents selective off-resonant
excitation of frequency-adjustable field probes.[4] This
allows to use hydrogen-based field probes in cases where the commonly
used fluorine-based field probes are impractical.Methods
Frequency adjustable magnetic field probes were
built as described in reference [4]. The resonance frequency of these
field probes can be changed by running a current through its B0-field modification coil.
MRI
experiments were performed on a 3 T MAGNETOM PrismaFit
system with a 20-channel head coil (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen,
Germany). Figure 1 shows the position of the phantom and the
frequency-adjustable field probe. The RF coil of the probe was
connected to the MRI system with a custom-built T/R switch and a
low-noise preamplifier (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The
field probe’s RF coil was operated in the receive-only mode.
The
current in the B0-field modification coil of the field probe was
controlled with a power supply located in the control room of the MRI
system connected via a 7 m long coaxial cable. A
choke balun and a low pass filter were used
to suppress both RF coupling and external noise associated with the
cable.
The
Pulseq framework [5] was applied to implement a custom gradient echo
(GRE) sequence. Trigger signals were added to control the current in
the B0-field modification coil. The MRI system supplied the trigger
signals via an optical output, controlling a custom built trigger box
that switched the current provided by the power supply on and off. A
solenoid driver IC (ULN2003B, Texas Instruments, USA) was used as
switch. The power supply was set to a current of 20 mA at a max.
voltage of 20 V.
Additionally,
the GRE sequence was extended by using a Gaussian pulse for field
probe excitation. The Gaussian pulse for probe excitation was set to
the shifted resonance frequency of the field probe (i.e the frequency of
the probe when the B0-field modification current is on). For measurement presented here, the frequency was shifted by +2265 Hz
compared to the center frequency of the MRI system.
The
frequency encoding direction was in
Z direction of the laboratory frame.
Three
pulse sequences were implemented to demonstrate the selective
off-resonant excitation of the new field probe. The
first sequence was implemented without main pulse and with the
trigger turned on during the Gaussian pulse. In the second sequence
the trigger was only turned on during the main pulse and was turned
off during the Gaussian pulse. The third sequence had the trigger
turned on for the duration of both the main and the Gaussian pulse.
Corresponding schematic sequence diagrams are depicted in figures 2 -
4.
In
addition, free
induction decays (FIDs) were recorded both after excitation at the main RF-frequency and after off-resonant
excitation. This means
the RF frequency offset was set to 0 Hz when no current was applied
and to 2265 Hz during the measurement with a current of 20 mA. The
FIDs were recorded with the receive coil of the field probe only. The
MRI phantom was removed during these measurements in order to
prevent interference with background signals in the recorded spectra.Results and Discussion
The GRE image in figure 2 shows a bright dot at
the location of the field probe. In order to obtain a substantial
signal from the probe, the excitation frequency has to be closely
matched to the frequency shift induced by the B0-field modification
coil of the field probe. After the frequency shift has been applied it is possible to hide the field probe from the excitation
pulses as shown in figure 3. Figure 4 shows the case, when probe and
phantom were excited by independent RF pulses and recorded
simultaneously.
The
FIDs and the corresponding spectra at a modification current of 0 mA
and 20 mA are depicted in Figure 5.
At
0 mA B0-field modification current, the T2* of the field probe was
17.1 ms. Measured FIDs from the probe at 20 mA modification current
and off-resonant excitation showed a
shorter T2* of 9.3 ms at a frequency shift of 2.2 kHz. The reduction
in T2* is probably caused by inhomogeneities on the B0-field of
the used B0-field modification coil. The homogeneity of the
relatively short solenoid coil used in the present proof-of-concept study is certainly not
optimal. It can potentially be improved by additional wire windings
and the optimization of the winding pitch. Alternative approach to
improve the field homogeneity across the sample volume at the cost of
SNR is to reduce the droplet size. Since the materials used to build
the probe were not susceptibility matched, the T2* is relatively
short compared to the probes presented in [1]. The manufacturing of
susceptibility matched-prototypes is planned in near future.Conclusion
The selective off-resonant excitation of
frequency-adjustable magnetic field probes was demonstrated.
Findings can be beneficial in manifold ways leading to a more
flexible measurement design and eventually allowing the integration
of probes within the RF coils or the gradient bore.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Barmet et al. Spatiotemporal magnetic field
monitoring for MR. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:187–197.
2.
De Zanche et al. NMR Probes for Measuring Magnetic Fields. Magn Reson
Med 2008;60:176-186.
3.
Jorge J et al. Tracking discrete off-resonance markers. Magn Reson
Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):160-171.
4. Wehkamp et al. Frequency adjustable magnetic
field probes. ISMRM 2019 (Abstract 0923)
5. Layton et al. Pulseq: A rapid and hardware-independent pulse sequence prototyping framework. Magn Reson
Med 2017;77:1544-1552.