Ryusuke Nakai1, Seiji Yamaguchi2, Mitsuaki Toda3, Takashi Azuma4, and Hiroo Iwata4
1Kokoro Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 2College of Life and Health Sciences, Chubu University, Aichi, Japan, 3Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Jikei Institute, Osaka, Japan, 4Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Synopsis
Reducing or resolving susceptibility artifacts
is important for development of materials for medical implants. In this study,
we measured and evaluated magnetic susceptibility artifacts for various metals
and ceramics using two MRI systems with different static magnetic field
strengths and multiple imaging sequences. MR images were acquired following the
criteria of the spin echo sequence and gradient echo sequence required in the
US FDA standard artifact evaluation test. The results were used to clarify the
relationships among artifact size in MR images, volume magnetic susceptibility
of samples, and static magnetic field strength of the MRI system.
Purpose
Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) permits noninvasive diagnosis of human disease. Adjustment
of the sequence and parameters of MRI can yield morphological and functional
images of varying contrast. The importance of MRI in diagnostic imaging has
increased yearly. However, in patients with medical devices
made of metal or including metallic parts, such as stents, radiation markers and
emboli coils, artifacts associated with magnetic susceptibility may occur on MR
images. This often makes it difficult to evaluate tissues around such medical
devices and to use MRI for follow-up of patients after device implantation. Therefore,
reducing or resolving susceptibility artifacts is important in development of
materials for medical implants. In this study, we measured and evaluated
magnetic susceptibility artifacts for various metals and ceramics using two MRI
systems with different static magnetic field strengths and multiple imaging
sequences. This study provides useful information for development of artifact-reducing
materials for medical implants.Materials and Methods
Metals
(Ag, Al, Cu, Mg, Nb, Sn, Ta, Ti, Zr) and ceramics (Al2O3,
CuO, Nb2O5, SiO2, Ta2O5,
TiO2, ZrO2) were prepared as materials for MRI tests. The
size of all samples to be imaged was a φ10.0 mm × 0.5 mm cylinder (disk shape).
Metal samples were cut from a metal rod (φ10.0 mm) using a precise cutting
machine with a diamond blade. For the ceramic samples, ceramic pellets were
molded by a mold press machine and pressed at 392 MPa using a CIP (Cold Isostatic
Pressing) machine. The samples were polished with a diamond file to adjust the
size, after they were sintered in an electric furnace at 1450°C for 4 hours. In artifact evaluation experiments, disk-shaped samples were fixed
with agarose gel in a test tube and imaged (Fig. 1). MRI was performed on a 1.5 T whole
body scanner (Magnetom Sonata, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) and a 3.0 T whole
body scanner (Magnetom Verio, Siemens AG) using dedicated small-bore phased
array receiver coils (Takashima Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 2)
for high resolution MRI. MR images were acquired using a spin echo
sequence (TR, 500 ms; TE, 20 ms; pixel size, 0.5 x 0.5 mm; thickness, 2.0 mm;
matrix size, 256 x 256; NEX, 2) and a gradient echo sequence (TR, 250 ms; TE,
15 ms; pixel size, 0.4 x 0.4 mm; thickness, 2.0 mm; flip angle, 30 deg.; matrix
size, 320 x 320; NEX, 2), using the parameters required in the US FDA standard
artifact evaluation test [1]. The artifact length from the sample margin was
measured in the acquired images using in-house software for artifact evaluation.
The sizes of artifacts in the images were evaluated to determine the effects of
static magnetic field strength, imaging sequence, and magnetic susceptibility.Results and Discussion
Examples
of MR images taken with spin echo and gradient echo sequences using a 1.5 T MRI
system and a dedicated small-bore phased array receiver coil are shown in Fig.
3. For pure copper, which has a susceptibility approximately equal to that of
water and human tissue (≈ -9 ppm), the form depicted was approximately a slender rectangle with
both sequences. For pure Ti, which has a different susceptibility to that of water,
smile-type artifacts were noted with the spin echo sequence and large
butterfly-type artifacts were seen with the gradient echo sequence. The relationship
between artifact size and volume magnetic susceptibility of metal samples when
imaged with a 1.5 T MRI system and a dedicated small-bore phased array receiver
coil is shown in Fig. 4. The artifact length was correlated with the measured
magnetic susceptibility of the metal samples. The artifact size decreased as
the volume magnetic susceptibility became close to that of the surrounding
material (agarose gel, water ≈ -9 ppm). The artifact length increased in
the following order: spin echo (1.5 T) < spin echo (3.0 T) < gradient
echo (1.5 T) < gradient echo (3.0 T). The artifact on the 3.0 T MRI system
was 2.3 times larger than that on the 1.5 T MRI system, and the artifact with the
gradient echo was 3.3 times larger than that with the spin echo. In ceramic
samples, ZrO2 had very small artifacts with both sequences, but TiO2
had moderate artifacts. These results show that even similar ceramics can have
different artifact sizes, which indicates the importance of measuring the
magnetic susceptibility of ceramics.Conclusion
The
relationship between material composition and magnetic susceptibility artifacts
using various metal and ceramic samples was investigated in this study. In
metal samples, the artifact size decreased as the volume magnetic susceptibility
became close to that of the surrounding material. The artifact size was larger on
3.0 T MRI than on 1.5 T MRI and larger with a gradient echo sequence than with
a spin echo sequence. In ceramic samples, similar ceramics had different
artifact sizes. The results of this study provide important information for
development of materials for use in implantable medical devices.Acknowledgements
This study was conducted using the
MRI scanner and related facilities at the Institute for Frontier Life and Medical
Sciences and Kokoro Research Center (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan). This work
was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS; KAKENHI
grant numbers JP19H05366 & JP19K22963).References
[1] ASTM
F2119, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 13.01.