Weiguo Li1,2, Kathleen Harris1, Ali Khan1, Simone Raiter1, Monica Matsumoto3, Andrew C Larson1, and Samdeep Mouli1
1Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Research Resource Centers, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 3Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
Management
options for localized prostate cancer have largely remained the same for the
past 30 years. 90Yttrium (90Y) radioembolization is a
novel radiotherapy approach that offers the potential to deliver high-dose radiation
therapy with minimal non-target radiation. However, currently no accurate way exists
to evaluate radiation effects noninvasively following embolization. In this
study, we sought to apply diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI
to investigate assess the effects of treatment following 90Y prostate
artery radioembolization in a dog prostate model.
Introduction
Prostate
cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. Management options
for localized prostate cancer have largely remained the same for the past 30
years.1 90Yttrium (90Y) radioembolization offers
the potential to deliver high-dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer with
minimal non-target radiation.2 However, while this novel approach is
currently being carried out, there is a need to evaluate radiation effects upon
the prostate. The objective of this preliminary study was to assess the
response of prostate tissue to 90Y prostate artery radioembolization
using diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in a dog prostate
hyperplasia model.Methods
Canine model: All the experiments are approved by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Four male 10-14 kg castrated
beagles were treated with hormones for 3 months, per the model for benign
prostatic hypertrophy induction in canines.3
90Y
administration: Each dog was
catheterized through femoral artery approach with a 2.1 F catheter (Merit
Medical, South Jordan, UT) under fluoroscopy. The catheter was used to select
the right or left prostatic artery for delivery 90Y microspheres to one lobe of
prostate gland with contralateral side serving as a control. Under fluoroscopic
control, the microspheres (approximately 100 Gy dose) were administered.
MRI:
All MRI studies were performed using 1.5T Siemens Aera. Beagles were scanned prior
to, 3 and 40 days post-90Y radioembolization and were anesthetized with isoflurane during
MRI measurements. Multiparametric MRIs were acquired with T2-weighted,
T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
T2-weighted turbo spin echo was acquired with the following parameters: repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 4,000/67
ms; field of view (FOV) = 135 x 160 mm2; matrix size = 320 x 270; turbo factor =
23, slice thickness = 1.1 mm. Diffusion imaging was performed using a diffusion-weighted
SE-EPI sequence with b-values of 400, 600, 800 s/mm2 and other
parameters: TR/TE = 4100/64 ms, FOV=137x 200 mm2, thickness = 1.5
mm, matrix size 176 x 256. Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Bayer Healthcare)
was injected intravenously as a rapid bolus (0.1 mmol/kg) at a rate less than
10 mL per 15 seconds. Contrast uptake was followed for 5 minutes with DCE-MRI. The
DCE-MRI acquisition consisted of a 3D VIBE dynamic acquisition with the
following parameters: TR/TE = 4.47/1.81 ms, FOV=159 x 159 mm2, matrix
size = 192 x192, flip angle = 12°, slice thickness = 3 mm, and a
temporal resolution of 2.8 sec. A post-contrast T1-weighed VIBE scan
with fat saturation was performed with scanning parameters: TR/TE = 9/2.38 ms,
FOV = 160 x 160 mm2, matrix size = 224 x 224, flip angle = 10°,
slice thickness = 1 mm, scan time = 4 min.
Image post-processing was performed in MATLAB (MathWorks). Signal-to-noise
ratios (SNRs) were calculated from regions of interest (ROIs) manually drawn in
muscle, normal prostate, center of the treated region, and rim of the treated
region. Initial area under the curve (IAUC) for Gd was calculated with
integration times of 30 and 180 second post–contrast infusion (IAUC30
and IAUC180).4 Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map
was generated with a monoexponential fitting.Results
Representative images of T2-weighted,
post contrast T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and diffusion maps at
pre-, 3 and 40 days post-90Y radioembolization are shown in Fig. 1. Compared
to the pre-treatment images (top panel in Fig. 1), T2-weighted
images (Fig. 1A, E, I) and post contrast T1-weighted images (Fig. 1B,
F, J) showed only weak increase of image intensity in the 90Y
treated lobe of prostate (arrows). As shown in Fig. 2., ADC
was found decreased in the treated lobe and increased at the contralateral
control side at 3 days post-90Y when compared to measurements pre-90Y.
However, an increased ADC was found in the treated lobe at 40 days post-90Y
(Fig 1 and 2). The 90Y treated regions showed more signal
enhancement compared to the contralateral control regions in the DCE T1-weighted
images 3 days post-90Y radioembolization (Fig. 3B) and the rim of
the treated regions showed more signal enhancement at 40 days post-90Y
(Fig. 3C and Fig. 4). The calculated IAUC values showed changes in treated and contralateral
control regions of the prostate with time, while those of neighboring muscle remained
stable (Fig. 4).Discussion
Focal
therapies for prostate cancer represent the next major advancement in prostate
cancer therapy. 90Y radioembolization offers the potential to deliver
high-dose radiation therapy with minimal non-target toxicity. In this study, our results indicated that both 90Y
treated lobe and untreated contralateral control of prostate show changes in diffusion and DCE
perfusion parameters at short-term (3 days) and relative long-term (40 days)
post-90Y radioembolization.Conclusion
90Y radioembolization is a novel radiotherapy
approach that offers the potential to deliver high-dose radiation therapy with
minimal off-target toxicity. This preliminary study showed that diffusion and
DCE MRI are sensitive to 90Y radioembolization therapeutic effects
in the prostate.Acknowledgements
This research was supported by NCI grant Number RO1CA181658 and
grant from BTG.
References
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018.
2018; 68(1): 7-30.
2. Zaorsky NG, Davis BJ, Nguyen PL, et al. The evolution of
brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Nature Reviews Urology 2017; 14: 415.
3. DeKlerk DP, Coffey DS, Ewing LL, et al. Comparison of
spontaneous and experimentally induced canine prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin
Invest. 1979 Sep; 64(3):842-9.
4. Chung WJ, Kim HS, Kim N, et al. Radiology. 2013 Volume
269: Number 2—November 2013 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130016.