Venkateswara Gogineni1, Dilip Maddirela1, Woo Ram Park2, Jaidip Jagtap1, Abdul Parchur1, Gayatri Sharma1, El-Sayed H Ibrahim1, Amit Joshi1, Andrew Larson2, Dong-Hyun Kim2, and Sarah B White1
1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 2Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
Systemic chemotherapy is the standard of care for the treatment of
unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. However, new drug delivery platforms
are needed to mitigate its associated toxicities. In this study, we develop and
evaluate a liposome formulation that deliver oxaliplatin under magnetic field
stimulus site selectively release in high concentration to alleviate the
off-target effects in a rat model of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
Quantitative MRI enabled assessment of changes in tumor characteristics over
time for confirmation of procedural success and proper catheter-selective tumor
targeting, which allows for high concentrations of oxaliplatin and improves
survival outcomes in CRLM tumor-bearing rats.
Introduction
The American cancer society estimates that in the United States,
colorectal cancer is
the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men and in
women, and the second most common
cause of cancer deaths when men and women are combined. Systemic
chemotherapy is the standard of care for the treatment of unresectable
metastatic colorectal cancer. However, new drug delivery platforms are needed
to mitigate the associated severe systemic toxicities.
The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a liposome formulation
that deliver oxaliplatin under magnetic field stimulus site selectively release
in high concentration to alleviate the off-target effects in a rat model of
colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Our approach integrated nanomedicine,
molecular MRI, optical imaging, site selective delivery and controlled release
to optimize treatment efficacy.Methods
Hybrid liposome-magnetic nanoparticles loaded with Cy5.5 dye and
oxaliplatin (L-NIR- Fe3O4/OX) were fabricated by using
the thermal decomposition method. CRLM (CC-531) cell viability was assessed and
rats orthotopically implanted with CC-531 cells were treated with L-NIR- Fe3O4/OX
or by drug alone via different routes of administration, up to 3 cycles of
alternating magnetic field (AMF).
Wistar rats (n=4), weighing 300-350g, were used for in-vivo scans.
For the inoculation procedure, anesthesia was obtained using 2-3% isoflurane. A
3-cm midline incision was made and both the left and right hepatic lobes were
mobilized to implant sub-capsular tumors. Approximately two weeks
post-implantation, X-ray digital subtraction angiography was performed to
selectively place a catheter into tumor feeding branches of the hepatic artery.
After catheter placement, 500μL of liposomes were infused, after which the
catheter was withdrawn. Optical and MR imaging was performed to assess the
targeted delivery. Biodistribution and histology was performed to determine the
distribution of oxaliplatin.
MRI was performed before and immediately after liposomes infusion,
as well as after AMF triggering using T2* imaging sequence using the following
imaging parameters: repetition time (TR) = 800 ms, 9 echo times (TE) ranging
from 4 ms to 48 ms in 5.5 ms increments, flip angle = 50⁰, matrix = 128x128,
field of view (FOV) = 45x45 mm2, slice thickness =1 mm, acquisition
bandwidth = 586 Hz/pixel, # averages = 2, and scan time ~1 minute/slice. Stacks
of parallel axial and coronal slices covering the liver were acquired using
respiratory gated acquisition to avoid breathing artifacts. T2* maps were
created for all acquired slices by fitting signal intensities from the nine
echoes to mono-exponential decaying curves on the pixel level. T2* values were
measured in the tumors and normal tissues in all slices at three timepoints:
before contrast infusion, after infusion, and after AMF triggering.Results
L-NIR-
Fe3O4/OX presented an increase of oxaliplatin release
(~18%) after the samples were exposed to the AMF. Cell viability after L-NIR-
Fe3O4/OX treatment and exposure to AMF were significantly
lower than those not exposed to AMF (P < .001). Optical imaging
showed a significant release of oxaliplatin in vitro and in vivo
among mesenteric vein (MV) injected group of animals.
MRI
showed that T2* values in the tumors (13.8±0.8 ms) were significantly (P = .0004)
different from those in normal liver tissues (4.7±0.7 ms). The tumors’ T2*
values significantly (P = .003) decreased post contrast infusion to 12±0.6 ms.
T2* further decreased after AMF triggering to 11.3±0.8 ms, which was not
significantly different from the values before AMF triggering (P = .2).
Biodistribution analysis showed significantly higher levels of
oxaliplatin in liver tissues compared to lungs (P < .001) and intestines (P <
.001) in the MV animals that received AMF after L-NIR- Fe3O4/OX
administration. Large tumor necrotic zones and significant improvement in the
survival rates were noted in the MV animals treated with AMF. Discussion
This
study showed the capability of noninvasive assessment of liposome nanoparticles
distribution to liver tumors using MRI imaging. Quantitative MRI enabled
assessment of changes in tumor T2* values over time for confirmation of
procedural success and proper catheter-selective tumor targeting.
The
presence of iron oxide in the liposomes allows for triggered release of
therapeutic agents by external triggers like alternating magnetic field or
heat. Stimulated drug release reduces off-target effects and improves the
efficiency of local high dose release. Further, the amount of therapeutic agent
delivered to the targeted region can be quantitated and the outcome of the
procedure can be assessed.Conclusion
In conclusion, site selective delivery allows for high
concentrations of oxaliplatin and improves survival outcomes in colorectal
liver metastasis tumor bearing rats.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
- American
Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2017-2019.
- Guardia
P et al. ACS nano, 2012. 6(4): p. 3080-3091.
- Bae
KH et al. ACS nano, 2012. 6(6): p. 5266-5273.
- Mikhaylov
G et al. Nature nanotechnology, 2011. 6(9): p. 594-602.
- Tansi,
FL et al. Small, 2013. 9(21): p. 3659-3669.