G. Wilson Miller1,2, Yekaterina Gilbo2, Stephen Dodd3, Alan P Koretsky3, Hatem ElBidweihy4, and Mladen Barbic5
1Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States, 2Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States, 3National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States, 4United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD, United States, 5HHMI - Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, United States
Synopsis
We describe the use of MRI-compatible focused ultrasound
(FUS) for selective fast focal switching of high-contrast-ratio magnetocaloric
MRI particle labels. Lanthanum-Iron-Silicon (La-Fe-Si) particles that have
sharp first-order magnetic phase transitions at physiological temperatures and MRI
field strengths were used as MRI labels. Non-invasive rapid thermal switching
of these magnetocaloric MRI particle labels with focused ultrasound was clearly
demonstrated at physiological temperatures within a clinical 1.5T MR scanner. We have thereby shown that high differential
contrast ratio magnetocaloric MRI labels can be switched non-invasively,
rapidly, and selectively under conditions relevant to clinical MRI.
Introduction
Magnetocaloric
materials previously developed
for magnetic refrigeration1,2, data storage3,
and spintronics applications4 were recently proposed as novel high-contrast
labels for MRI5-7. Proof-of-concept MRI experiments
have shown that the sharp first-order magnetic phase transitions of these
materials at physiological temperatures and Tesla-scale DC magnetic field
values provide an ideal match to the requirements for switchable MRI labels5-7.
A drawback of prior experiments was the necessity of thermally cycling the
entire phantom at slow ramp rates to induce the embedded labels’ magnetic phase
transitions. Here, we explore the potential of using focused ultrasound (FUS)8-11
to locally, selectively, and rapidly thermally switch Lanthanum-Iron-Silicon
(La-Fe-Si)12-14
MRI particle labels at physiological temperatures in a 1.5 Tesla magnetic field. Methods
A Lanthanum-Iron-Silicon (La-Fe-Si) powder sample (100 μm-250 μm
particle size) was obtained from a commercial vendor (Calorivac H product line
from Vacuumschmelze). Temperature dependent magnetic properties of the powder
sample were measured in a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) (Versalab System
from Quantum Design, Inc.) at 1.5T, to match the operating field of a 1.5T MR
scanner (Siemens Avanto). For the MRI characterization, individual La-Fe-Si particles
were placed ~15 mm apart, sandwiched between two layers of Zerdine hydrogel phantom
material. An MRI-compatible focused ultrasound system10 (FUS
Instruments) was used for
focused delivery of ultrasonic energy (35W for 20s, 1.1 MHz continuous-wave) to
individual particles embedded in the phantom, while MR imaging was simultaneously
performed to monitor image contrast. A spoiled gradient-echo pulse sequence (TR/TE/FA
= 39 ms/2.4 ms/20°; voxel size = 1 mm×1 mm; FOV = 128 mm×128 mm; readout bandwidth = 1185 Hz/pixel; 5 s per image) was used
to acquire a time series of 24 consecutive images of a single 3 mm slice at the
location of the particles during the time period spanning each 20s sonication. Due
to rapid dephasing of the MR signal in the vicinity of each particle, it was
not possible to use MR thermometry to monitor FUS-induced temperature changes during
thermal switching. Instead, the magnitude and time course of FUS-induced
heating were quantified separately by sonicating a spot away from the particles
while measuring the proton resonance frequency shift8 using the
same imaging pulse sequence but with longer TE (5 ms). Results
Figure 1 shows the VSM measurements of the magnetic moment of
La-Fe-Si powder sample as a function of temperature in the bias DC magnetic
field of 1.5T. The sample exhibits a sharp magnetic transition with narrow hysteresis over a narrow range of physiologically relevant temperatures (~37°C
= 310 K).
Figure 2 shows a sequence of representative gradient-echo
images, illustrating the effect of sequential delivery of focused ultrasound energy
to individual La-Fe-Si particles in the phantom. Rapid and selective magnetocaloric particle
MRI label switching is evident in the time course images.
Figure 3 shows MR
thermometry results, including peak temperature evolution at the hottest pixel
(red curve) and mean temperature over surrounding pixels (blue curve).
Comparison with the time-course images in Figure 2 indicates that the
magnetocaloric particles switch “off” at approximately 15-20° above the room
temperature of ~21°, which corresponds to a
range slightly above body temperature. Discussion and Conclusion
Non-invasive and selective fast focal switching of
high-contrast-ratio magnetocaloric La-Fe-Si particle MRI labels was
demonstrated at physiological temperatures and MRI field strengths using focused
ultrasound. Development of novel contrast mechanisms and agents
for MRI is critical for further advancements in label readout of physiological
conditions, non-invasive cell imaging, and
tracking in vivo15-19. Our
results provide further impetus for the development of high differential
contrast ratio switchable MRI labels using magnetocaloric materials in microparticle
form and establish a practical avenue for non-invasive activation. Future work
will include preparing such materials for multi-functional imaging by tuning
their physical properties through materials science techniques as well as
developing MRI-compatible instrumentation for controlled switching of these
materials in vivo. Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical
Institute, United States Naval Academy, University of Virginia Focused
Ultrasound Center, and the NINDS Intramural Research Program of the National
Institutes of Health. We thank Brian Bell and Kevin Ackerman of Vacuumschmelze
company for generously providing us with the Calorivac H samples of La-Fe-Si
powder. References
[1] V. Franco, J. S. Blazquez, B. Ingale, A. Conde, The Magnetocaloric Effect and Magnetic Refrigeration Near Room Temperature: Materials and Models. Annu Rev Mater Res 42 305 (2012). [2] X. Moya, S. Kar-Narayan, M. D. Mathur. Caloric materials near ferroic phase transitions. Nature Materials 13 439 (2014). [3] J. U. Thiele, S. Maat, and E. E. Fullerton, FeRh/FePt exchange spring films for thermally assisted magnetic recording media, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2859 (2003). [4] X. Marti, I. Fina, C. Frontera, J. Liu, P. Wadley, Q. He, et al. Room-temperature antiferromagnetic memory resistor. Nature Materials 13, 367 (2014). [5] M. Barbic, T. D. Harris, S. Dodd, H. D. Morris, A. P. Koretsky, B. Marcheschi, A. Huston, and N. R. Dilley, Magneto-Caloric Materials as Tunable and Switchable Labels for MRI, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017) 0999, 25th Annual Meeting of ISMRM; 2017; Honolulu, HI, USA. [6] M. Barbic, S. Dodd, H. D. Morris, N. R. Dilley, B. Marcheschi, A. Huston, T. D. Harris, and A. P. Koretsky, “Magneto-Caloric Materials as Switchable High Differential Contrast MRI Labels” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 81, 2238 (2019). [7] M. Barbic, H. ElBidweihy, S. Dodd, H. D. Morris, and A. P. Koretsky, “Magneto-Caloric Materials as Symmetric Reverse-Contrast Switchable MRI Labels” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27, (2019) 3977, 27th Annual Meeting of ISMRM; 2019; Montreal, Canada. [8] Cline HE, Hynynen K, Hardy CJ, Watkins RD, Schenck JF, Jolesz FA. MR temperature mapping of focused ultrasound surgery. Magn Reson Med. 1994;31(6):628-36. [9] Kennedy JE. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(4):321-7. [10] Chopra R, Curiel L, Staruch R, Morrison L, Hynynen K. An MRI-compatible system for focused ultrasound experiments in small animal models. Med Phys. 2009;36(5):1867-74. [11] Jolesz FA. MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Annu Rev Med. 2009; 60:417-30. [12] Fujita A, Fujieda S, Hasegawa Y, Fukamichi K. Itinerant-electron metamagnetic transition and large magnetocaloric effects in La(FexSi1-x)(13) compounds and their hydrides. Phys Rev B. 2003; 67(10). [13] M. Katter, V. Zellmann, G. W. Reppel, and K. Uestuener, Magnetocaloric Properties of La(Fe,Co,Si)13, Bulk Material Prepared by Powder Metallurgy, IEEE Trans. Magn. 44, 3044 (2008). [14] B. R. Hansen, L. T. Kuhn, C. R. H. Bahl, M. Lundberg, C. Ancona-Torres, M. Katter, Properties of magnetocaloric La(Fe,Co,Si)13 produced by powder metallurgy, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 322, 3447 (2010). [15] E. M. Shapiro, S. Skrtic, K. Sharer, J. M. Hill, C. E. Dunbar, and A. P. Koretsky, MRI detection of single particles for cellular imaging, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 101, 10901 (2004). [16] J. W. M. Bulte, D. L. Kraitchman, Iron oxide MR contrast agents for molecular and cellular imaging. NMR Biomed. 17,484 (2004). [17] G. Zabow, S. Dodd, J. Moreland, and A. P. Koretsky, Micro-engineered local field control for high-sensitivity multispectral MRI, Nature 453, 1058 (2008). [18] E. T. Ahrens and J. W. M. Bulte, Tracking immune cells in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging, Nature Reviews Immunology, 13, 755 (2013). [19] G. Zabow, S. Dodd, and A. P. Koretsky, Shape-changing magnetic assemblies as high-sensitivity NMR-readable nanoprobes, Nature 520, 73 (2015).