Marc Dubois1,2, Lisa Leroi3, Zo Raolison4, Redha Abdeddaim1, Tryfon Antonakakis4, Julien De Rosny5, Alexandre Vignaud3, Pierre Sabouroux1, Elodie Georget4, Benoit Larrat3, Gérard Tayeb1, Nicolas Bonod1, Alexis Amadon3, Franck Mauconduit3, Cyril Poupon3, Denis Le Bihan3, and Stefan Enoch1
1Institut Fresnel, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Marseille, France, 2CRMBM, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Marseille, France, 3CEA, DRF, JOLIOT, NeuroSpin, UNIRS, Gif sur Yvette, France, 4Multiwave Imaging, Marseille, France, 5ESPCI Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Institut Langevin, Paris, France
Synopsis
We show that hybridized meta-atom can be used to improve transmit homogeneity in a 7T head birdcage coil equipped with a 32-channel
receive array. Our results demonstrates the enhancement of transmit
signal in vivo with
the possibility to fill one of the gap usually observed in the brain
temporal
lobes. This metamaterial based passive shimming strategy provides a cost
effective, long-lasting solution without any impact on
the
patient’s comfort during the examination.
Background
Ultra-high field scanners benefits in terms of signal-to-Noise ratio
(SNR) and Contrast-to-Noise ratio (CNR) are undermined by the inhomogeneous
propagation of the radiofrequency (RF) field in the human body at 7T. Parallel
transmission technique using multi-channels RF coils is being explored to solve
this issue 1,2. Our aim is to tackle this hardware problem via passive RF shimming, i.e. inserting high dielectric constant
materials 3,4,5 or metamaterial structures 6 around the
subject to tailor the B1+ amplitude. We demonstrated in vitro that the hybridization of four
parallel metallic wires arranged on a square unit cell provides the ability to
control RF field inside a 7T head birdcage equipped with a receive array
(1Tx/32Rx - Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA, USA) 7. Here, we show the
first in vivo testing of the
hybridized meta-atom (HMA) on two healthy volunteers with safe sequence
protocols designed for RF prototype assessment at 7T 8.Methods
Four 1-mm-diameter brass wires are assembled at the four corners of a
1-cm-side square to form the HMA structure. The latter is then placed between the birdcage
used for transmission and the receive array. Figure 1 presents a schematics of
the experimental setup. MRI acquisitions were performed using a SC72 gradient
dedicated 1Tx/32Rx proton head coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA, USA) in a 7T
Magnetom MRI scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Figure 2 presents the parameters of the in vivo
protocol used. It includes a localizer (Proton density weighted), a B0
mapping and a flip angle (FA) mapping (XFL sequence 9). These parameters were
enforced such that even if all the input power was focused and absorbed within
10g of tissues, the SAR would not exceed the regulatory limits (global and
local SAR). The localizer and FA maps were acquired on three orthogonal slices sequentially.
In vivo acquisitions have been done
under local IRB rules on two healthy volunteers.Results
Results
on the first volunteer are presented in Figure 3. It shows the FA map obtained
for the reference scan without HMA in the three orientations (Vref 250V) and
the same maps acquired when a 42-cm-long HMA is inserted (Vref 320V). The
bottom row presents the relative gain between these two scans in percentage. Within
the coronal slice, the right hemisphere of the brain indicates a 28% average
gain in FA whereas the left one shows a reduction of 10%. The axial slice
located at the eyes level exhibits an increase of +17% on the HMA side and a
reduction of 27% on the opposite side. Meanwhile the loss in the cerebellum
region is 34% on average. Figure 4 displays the results obtained on the second
volunteer. The same methodology is applied, a reference scan was done first
(Vref 250V), followed by two scans: one with a 40-cm-long HMA (Vref 275V) and another
one with 44-cm-long HMA (Vref 325V) in the same location. Relative FA gain in
percentage is presented in comparison with the reference FA map in each case.
The relative gain in the coronal slice with 40-cm-long HMA is + 9% (similar for
44cm) on the HMA side and -2% (-9% for 44cm) on the opposite side. The loss in
the cerebellum area is around 10% in each case. The effect in the axial slice
is more localized than for the previous volunteer and the 40-cm-long HMA shows benefits
on a larger brain volume.Discussion
The
relative FA gain observed in Figure 3 is consistent with the observation made
on specific anthropomorphic phantom 7. While the opposite side of
the HMA shows some significant loss, the improvement on the HMA side is significant
considering the poor FA distribution in the reference map, as usually
encountered at 7T due to the volunteer’s head diameter. The second volunteer,
displayed in Figure 4 presents a smaller head diameter which yields a more
homogeneous FA distribution from the coil alone. In this case, we tested two
different HMA lengths. First, we observe that the 40-cm-long HMA only increased
the reference voltage by 10% which is positive regarding the transmit efficiency
of the coil (FA with respect to the input power). Moreover, the size reduction
(44cm to 40cm) does not affect strongly the performances of the HMA in terms of
relative FA gain. The results indicate that a reduced length HMA should be a
better solution but also show that the relative gain of the HMA depends on the
head diameter as the load of the birdcage coil changes.Conclusion
The
HMA solution previously studied in vitro
was successfully tested on two volunteers. This technique features the ability
to enhance locally the FA distribution together with the possibility to fill
one of the gap usually observed in the brain temporal lobes. Future work will
target the homogenization of FA in the whole brain with possibly the use of
multiple elements of various dimensions. Finally, let us stress the benefits of
the HMA is an ergonomic, cost effective, long-lasting solution
without being in direct contact with the subject’s body. This last point is
crucial for improving the patient’s comfort during examination.Acknowledgements
This work has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020
Research and Innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 736937. It is also supported
by the Leducq Foundation (large equipment ERPT program, NEUROVASC7T project).References
1 Katscher U. et al, NMR Biomed 2006; 19: 393–400
2 Grissom W. et al, Magn. Reson.
Med. 2006; 56: 620–629
3 A. G. Webb,
Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 2011; 38A, 148
4 T.
P. A. O’Reilly, A. G. Webb, and W. M. Brink, J. Magn.
Reson. 2016; 270, 108-114
5 A. L. Neves, et al, Magn. Reson. Med. 2018; 79,
1753
6 M. Dubois, et al, Phys. Rev. X 2018; 8, 031083
7 M. Dubois, et al, Proc. Intl.
Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2019; 27, 1491
8 A. Vignaud,
et al, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2018; 1092 012159
9 A. Amadon, et al,
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2015;
23, 2377