Viacheslav Ivanov1, Alena Shchelokova1, Anna Andreychenko1,2, and Alexey Slobozhanyuk1
1Faculty of Physics and Engineering, ITMO University, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 2Research and Practical Clinical Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Heathcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation
Synopsis
We propose a concept
for targeted bilateral breast imaging. A practical demonstration of the concept
features a pair of hollow dielectric cylindrical resonators based on a
composite material with very high permittivity. The resonators are
electromagnetically coupled to the body birdcage coil and each other. Electromagnetic
simulations demonstrated that symmetric B1+ field
mode, inherent in interacting resonators, can be efficiently excited at 123 MHz
via the body birdcage coil. Simulations with realistic voxel models let us
estimate transmit efficiency and radiofrequency safety of the proposed device
and demonstrated that the concept promising for clinical applications.
Introduction
Here we describe and demonstrate through
electromagnetic simulations, a concept of targeted bilateral breast MRI, as a
way to increase specificity of breast imaging for screening purposes. The idea
is based on a local redistribution and passive focusing of the radiofrequency
(RF) magnetic flux of the birdcage coil (BC) using electromagnetic coupling
with subwavelength dielectric resonator surrounding the target area (Figure
1A). Proof-of-concept unilateral targeted
breast imaging was numerically and experimentally approved in our previous work.1 In this work we introduced two coupled resonators for bilateral imaging, moved
to appropriate size of hollow ceramic cylinders and estimated RF safety with
realistic voxelised models, thus making a step towards clinical application.
Methods
A proposed concept was
based on a passive focusing of B1+ field of a body birdcage coil using a high
permittivity dielectric resonators.2,3 Each resonator was
constructed of four ceramic rings with relative permittivity ε≈900 and tanδ
≈0.0004 (at 1 MHz) and the following dimensions: inner diameter 128 mm, outer
diameter 150 mm, the height of each ring 25 mm. Distance between the centres of
the resonators was 160 mm. The placement of two cylindrical resonators next to
each other causes magnetic and electrical field mode splitting due to the
electromagnetic coupling. In other words, resonator’s TE01δ-mode4
was split into asymmetrical (lower frequency) and symmetrical (higher
frequency) modes. The frequency difference between asymmetrical and symmetrical
modes was about 10 MHz. As far as distribution of B1+ field in left and right
breasts should be the same, it is necessary to excite symmetrical magnetic
field mode of the coupled resonators. The frequency of the symmetrical mode was
tuned to 123 MHz (3T MRI) by changing the spacing between the ceramic rings. We
have used several thin rings made of plexiglass with ε~3.5 and
σ=0.02 S/m as spacers, which had
the same inner and outer diameters as the ceramic rings. To preserve the
efficiency of the ceramic resonators with proximity to the chest a thin
metallic plate of 35 μm-thick copper with two holes (with the same diameter as
the outer diameter of ceramic rings) was added. All numerical simulations were
performed in CST Microwave Studio 2017. Mode splitting was investigated as a
function of the distance between the resonators. Here we used a loop coil
placed at the centre over one of the resonators to excite TE01δ-mode (Figure 3A, B). Then electromagnetic modelling
of the resonators was performed using voxelized female human body models placed
in a standard birdcage coil (Figure 1B).
We considered three voxel models5 with different ratio between glandular and fatty tissue and its distribution over
the breasts: Phantom #1 from ACR Class 1, #3 from ACR Class 2 and #1 from ACR
Class 4 (Figure 2). Breast shape
and position of the models corresponds to the physiological configuration
during conventional breast imaging. For a reference, the birdcage coil was
simulated with the same body models at the same position, but without the
resonators. The B1+ field distributions were normalized to 1W of total accepted
power. The SARav.10g distributions were normalized to the same B1+ averaged in
the central XY slice in the breast area. The effect of the resonators on the birdcage
coil transmit performance was evaluated by comparison of the ratio $$$\frac{|B1+RMS |}{\sqrt{psSARav.10g}}$$$, denoted by RF safety , in the presence of the
resonators to the ratio with the BC alone, where the field
value was spatially averaged over the targeted area (RMS=root mean square), and psSARav.10g is
the 10-g-averaged peak spatial SAR.
Results
Figure 3 demonstrates mode
splitting for the different distance between the resonators: 16, 18, 20 cm. The
closer the resonators are, the stronger is coupling between them, and the
bigger is frequency gap between the modes and the lower is the quality factor
of the symmetrical mode. Consequently, ceramic
resonators efficiency became 15% lower for 20 cm case than for 16 cm. Figure 4 show that the ceramic resonators, being tuned to the symmetrical mode, coupled
effectively to the birdcage coil and focused its B1+ field in the breasts’
areas. Figures 5 demonstrate
peak spatial SAR value decrease. RF safety grew by 6.6 fold to reference case
for mostly fatty breast (Figure 2A), by 11.7 fold for scattered fibro glandular
breast (Figure 2B), and by 14.1 fold in case of very dense breast (Figure 2C).
Discussion
and conclusions
A couple of high permittivity ceramic resonators can
be used for targeted bilateral breast MRI at 3T. The resonators effectively
redistribute the electromagnetic field of the body birdcage coil and localise
it around the areas of interest that boosts both transmit efficiency and RF
safety of the breast imaging. 16 cm distance
between the centres of the resonators was chosen considering average anatomical
dimensions, and it is not optimal regarding the symmetrical mode quality factor.
Nevertheless, such configuration already gives significant benefits in terms of
transmit efficiency and RF safety (up to 23.8 and 14.1 fold respectively
in case of the very dense breast). Further investigations (for example, B1+
field inhomogeneity improvement over the region of interest) of the resonator
and MRI experiments with volunteers are ongoing.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 18-75-10088).
The authors are grateful to Dr Arthur W. Magill for providing realistic voxel
models.
References
1. Shchelokova A, et al. Dielectric
resonator for targeted breast MRI at 3T. Proc.
Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2019; 27, 0435.
2. Mett R R et al. Dielectric microwave
resonators in TE011 cavities for electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Rev Sci Instrum. 2008;79:094702.
3.Webb A. Dielectric materials in magnetic
resonance. Concept Magn Reson A. 2011 ;38A: 148-184.
4. Webb A. Cavity- and waveguide-resonators in electron paramagnetic
resonance, nuclear magnetic resonance, and magnetic resonance imaging. Prog
Nucl Mag ResSp. 2014;83:1-20.
5. The UWCEM Numerical Breast Phantom Repository http://uwcem.ece.wisc.edu/phantomRepository.html
6. Tissue
properties https://itis.swiss/virtual-population/tissue-properties/overview/