Md Shahadat Hossain Akram1, Takayuki Obata2, and Taiga Yamaya1
1Advance Nuclear Medicine Sciences, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS-QST), Chiba, Japan, 2Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS-QST), Chiba, Japan
Synopsis
For parallel transmit coils, maximum field-intensity is seen for the ROI close to each coil and, peripheral imaging region in between the coils usually show minimum field-intensity. For this reason, a compact orientation of multiple coils is usually
used to surround the ROI. An approach of field extension to the
regions in between coils is presented here for a 4-channel microstrip coil. Multiple narrow floating copper strips (width 4 mm) were used in between coils. For three such strips, image signal intensity between the coils almost
doubled, that resulted in 20% increase
in image homogeneity and 25% increase in SNR.
Introduction
In
an attempt to develop PET insert for ultra-high field (UHF) (e.g., 7 T) MRI
system, we previously developed a prototype 4-channel microstrip transmission
line RF coil [1] that included the RF shield box of PET detector modules as the
ground conductor of the coil and tested the coil with our available 3T MRI
system. To cover the whole imaging region of diameter 150 mm, we needed four
extra coils (total 8-channel), that could not be developed due to budget limitation.
In that study, it was clear that the peripheral imaging region in between coils
had minimum and very low image intensities (also can be seen in the Result
section of this summary). To improve image intensities in between coils of the
4-channel coil, in this study, we used parallel extra floating strip conductors
on both side of the coils to extend the RF field from the coils to the regions
in between the coils. The extra strips acted as antennas that induced and directs
the RF field from the microstrip coil to farther imaging regions. This approach
may find similarities with the functions of directors used to further extend
the field in the famous Yagi-Uda antenna, although no mathematical formulation was used for the positioning of the strips. We did experimental study in the same 3T
clinical MRI system with a homogenous phantom.Materials and Methods
The
microstrip coils were previously developed using 35 mm copper PCB. Each coil was 250 mm long (Fig.
1(a)) that was constructed with a 10 mm wide microstrip conductor and a 40 mm
wide RF shield box (height of 30 mm) that was used as the ground conductor of
the coil. The extra floating strips were made of 35 mm thick copper tape. Fig. 1(b) schematically
illustrates the field induction from the microstrip coil and extension to
farther regions by extra floating strip conductors. The radial gap between the
microstrip conductor and extra strips was about 20 mm. Three patterns of extra
strips were studied (Fig. 2): (1) pattern 1 – one extra strip positioning close
to each outer boundary of the shield box; (2) pattern 2 – with pattern 1, one
extra strips in between the coil center and the first strip; and (3) pattern 3
– with pattern 2, one extra strip outside the 40 mm wide shield box regions.
Experimental study was conducted in a 3T MRI system (Siemens MAGNETOM Verio)
using a homogeneous (NiCl2.6H2O and NaCl solution) cylindrical phantom
of dia. 115 mm and length 200 mm. Gradient echo (GE) images were taken for
flip-angle = 30 deg, TR = 300 ms, TE = 4 ms, Slice thickness = 5 mm, FOV = 150
mm and image matrix = 128X128. To calculate RF field
using double angle method [2], two GE images were taken with flip-angles 30 deg
and 60 deg and TR of 3000 ms, with all other parameters as above.Results and Discussion
Fig.
3 first row illustrates GE images for the only-coil and the three different
patterns of extra strip orientations, respectively. SNR values were calculated
for the central approximate 70% ROI and for visual clarity these ROIs are given
in the second row of Fig. 3. Signal intensity between coils almost doubled for the pattern 3. The corresponding SNRs [3] and image homogeneities
shows maximum increment of respectively 25% and 20% that was achieved for the
pattern 3 configuration. Three separate line diagrams are given in Fig 4 with
the corresponding lines marked in Fig. 4(a). From the all three line diagrams,
it is clearly seen that the signal intensity increased for the whole imaging
region for any of the three extra strip patterns. Fig. 5 illustrates the RF transmit
field responses. Compared to the only coil case, reduced RF power was required
to get similar flip-angle response for the case of extra strips, whereas for
equal power to the only coil case, flip-angle values increased. Use of more
than three extra strips did not show significant improvement for this case.Conclusion
This
study is a pilot study towards a preliminary confirmation of this approach.
However, further detail study including simulation would be required. With this approach we expect that a reduction
in transmit channels, for example, 12 or a smaller number of channels instead
of 16 channels for the case of brain imaging with parallel transmit microstrip coil
would be possible. Using dielectric materials in between coils might work
similarly, but not good for PET, as it would attenuate the gamma photons.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] M.S.H.
Akram et al. Microstrip transmission-line array coil dedicated for PET insert
for MRI system, Conference record, IEEE-NSS-MIC 2018.
[2] E. K. Insko, et al, J. Magn. Reson. Series A, 103, 82-85 (1993).
L.
Kaufman, et al, Radiology 173, 265-267 (1989).
[3] L. Kaufman, et al, Radiology 173, 265-267 (1989).