Chan-A Park1, Ju-Yeon Jung2, Yeong-Bae Lee3,4, and Chang-Ki Kang2,4,5
1Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 2Department of Healthy Science, Gachon University Graduate School, Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 3Department of Neurology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 4Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 5Department of Radiological Science, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
The
purpose of the study is to examine the difference of the functional
connectivity between the nasal and mouth breathing conditions in healthy
subjects using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging via
seed-based correlation analysis. “Mouth>Nose” contrast had 5 seeds and 23
connecting pairs, however, 6 seeds and 14 pairs in the “Mouth<Nose”
contrast. Especially, caudate had the most number of connections of salience
networks, supramarginal gyrus, insular cortex, central opercular cortex,
supramarginal gyrus, and parietal operculum in “Mouth>Nose” contrast. These
indicated that the limbic system regulates the resting-state functional
connectivity during the voluntary mouth breathing compared the nasal breathing.
Introduction
Pathological
or habitual mouth breathing leads to face deformation, a higher prevalence of
asthma, and low academic achievements in children. 1,2 Although
various side effects are associated with such a condition, fundamental research
on the changes in brain activity caused by mouth breathing has hardly been
conducted. 3 Furthermore, there is little investigation about
alterations of the resting-state functional connectivity (FC) in the
whole-brain regions in the voluntary mouth breathing condition using the
resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The aim of the study
is to examine the difference of the whole-brain FC network between mouth and
nasal breathing conditions in the resting-state fMRI via seed-based correlation
analysis.Methods
Twenty-three
healthy subjects (male:female = 10:13; age = 22.43 ± 1.34 years) participated
in the study and provided written informed consent. The study protocol was
approved by the institutional review board (IRB). The experiment was performed
using a 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner (Siemens Verio, Erlangen,
Germany) with a commercially available 12-channel radio-frequency (RF) head
matrix coil. All participants underwent two imaging sequences in MRI, that is,
a high-spatial-resolution T1-weighted anatomical imaging sequence of
three-dimensional (3D) magnetization–prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo
(MP-RAGE); and a blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI sequence of
two-dimensional (2D) echo planar imaging (EPI) with repetition time (TR)/echo
time (TE) = 2000 ms/30 ms, and flip angle (FA) = 90°. The participants were
asked to breathe voluntarily only through their mouth or nose at the beginning
of each session. Subjects were instructed not to move their head as much as
possible with eyes closed and stay awake throughout the scanning. Each subject
put nose plug on their nostrils during mouth breathing condition in order to
prevent nose breathing, whereas they took off the nose plug during nasal
breathing condition to induce a natural nasal breathing with the mouth closed.
The CONN (version 18b) FC toolbox (www.nitrc.org/projects/conn)
is a MATLAB-based software for the calculation, display and analysis of
resting-state FC in resting-state fMRI studies. The CONN was used to calculate
the strength and significance of the bivariate correlation among region of
interest (ROI) pairs within all subjects’ data in the “Nose” and “Mouth”
breathing conditions. To measure the level of linear association of the BOLD
time series, a bivariate correlation was used to conduct the first-level
analysis, in which the effect size is the correlation coefficient. 4
In ROI-to-ROI analysis, we tested both “Mouth>Nose” and “Mouth<Nose”
contrasts to create connections between whole ROIs and to perform networks analysis
with one-sided inferences. The connectome ring maps were constructed as the thresholded
intensity of ROI-to-ROI connection with one-sided positive seed level
correction and permutation tests. The significance of ROI-to-ROI connection was
determined through the false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected P < 0.05 with seed-level correction.Results
ROI-to-ROI
FC connectome ring (Fig. 1) showed more connections in the “Mouth” breathing
condition than the “Nose” breathing condition. The “Mouth>Nose” contrast had
significantly stronger connections in 19 ROIs (Fig. 2a) and 5 ROI-to-ROI
networks (Fig. 3a). Among them, the left and right lateral sensorimotor area
had the most significant connection (P
< 0.05, T = 5.67), and the left caudate had the biggest intensity value (P < 0.05, Intensity = 35.96) and 10
connected seeds which had the most number of connection pairs between other seeds
including salience networks (anterior cingulate cortex and supramarginal gyrus),
right supramarginal gyrus with posterior division, left and right insular
cortex, left central opercular cortex and supramarginal gyrus with anterior
division, and parietal operculum (P
< 0.05, Size = 10). However, the “Mouth<Nose” contrast had 10 significant
stronger ROI-to-ROI connections (Fig. 2b) and 6 networks (Fig. 3b). Among them,
the left lateral sensorimotor area and superior sensorimotor area had the most
significant connection (P < 0.05,
T = 6.86). The superior sensorimotor area had the biggest intensity value (P < 0.05, Intensity = 33.89) and 7
connected seeds which had the most number of connection pairs between other
seeds including the left and right lateral sensorimotor area and precentral
gyrus, left postcentral gyrus, left and right central opercular cortex (P < 0.05, Size = 7).Discussion
The
results showed that when compared with the nasal breathing condition, the mouth
breathing condition showed higher functional connections in the whole-brain ROIs.
Among them, basal ganglia, especially left caudate, exhibited the most number
of connections with other regions in the “Mouth>Nose” contrast. According to
the previous study, the caudate has a significant relation with the respiratory
sensation and motor process. These indicated that the limbic system could regulate
the resting-state functional connectivity during the voluntary mouth breathing compared
to the nasal breathing in healthy subjects.Conclusion
In
the present study, we demonstrated that the resting-state FC during voluntary mouth
breathing condition could significantly induce different connections of ROIs
compared to during nasal breathing condition in healthy subjects. These
findings suggested that FC of the voluntary mouth respiration was much more
associated with mouth sensation and motor process.Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Basic Science
Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded
by the Ministry of Education (grant number: NRF-2019R1I1A1A01058253).References
- Izu SC,
Itamoto CH, Pradella-Hallinan M et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS)
in mouth breathing children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(5):552-556.
- Jefferson
Y. Mouth breathing: adverse effects on facial growth, health, academics, and
behavior. Gen Dent. 2010;58(1):18-25.
- Park CA, Kang CK. Sensing the effects of mouth
breathing by using 3-tesla MRI. J Korean Phys Soc. 2017;70(12):1070-1076.
- Whitfield-Gabrieli
S, Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and
anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125-141.