Weimin Zheng1, Xiang Feng2, and Zhiqun Wang1
1Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China, 2MR Scientific Marketing, Diagnosis Imaging, Siemens Healthcare Ltd, Beijing, China
Synopsis
This study aims to explore whether the differences
in static and dynamic functional connectivity (s-FC and d-FC) can serve as
potential biomarkers of multiple system atrophy (MSA). 24 MSA patients and 20 normal
controls (NCs) were enrolled. We applied both s-FC and d-FC to evaluate
functional changes in MSA patients and calculated the graph theory attributes
based on s-FC and d-FC. We found that there were significant correlations
between indicators of s-FC and d-FC and clinical performance. Furthermore, the
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the substantially
different FC features can serve as predictors to distinguish MSA from NC.
Background and Purpose
Multiple system
atrophy (MSA) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder1. Recent
advances in neuroimaging techniques provide the opportunity to study the
disconnections (i.e., disruption of functional connectivity) in MSA in vivo. Previous
studies mostly assumed that the functional connectivity (FC) was constant
during the MRI scanning, and ignored its dynamic nature2,3,4. To
fill in the gap, the purpose of this study is to combine the stationary and
dynamic FC in the investigation of the changes of functional connectivity in
MSA.Material and Methods
The study
enrolled 24 MSA patients and 20 age- and gender-matched normal controls (NCs), the
average of age for MSA and NCs is 57.56 and 57.61 respectively. MSA patients contained
11 males and 13 females, while NCs contained 8 males and 12 females. The
diagnosis of MSA was according to the established international diagnostic
criteria of probable MSA defined by the American Academy of Neurology and
American Autonomic Society1.
All subjects
underwent MRI scan on a 3T whole-body MRI scanner (MAGNETOM Verio, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The resting state fMRI data was acquired in axial
orientation using an echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence with the following
parameters: repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE)/flip angle (FA) = 2000 ms/40
ms/90°, field of view (FOV) = 24×24 cm2, image matrix = 64×64, slices
= 33, slice thickness = 3 mm, slice gap = 1 mm, bandwidth = 2232 Hz/pixel. The
data processing was carried out using an in-house developed tool written in Python
and MATLAB. We applied both static and dynamic functional connectivity (s-FC
and d-FC) to evaluate functional changes in MSA patients. Graph theory
attributes were also calculated based on static and dynamic FC.
During network
construction, we adopted a specified brain atlas to define nodes and
constructed brain network for each participant. The atlas consists of
whole-brain Brodmann areas5 and the cerebellum parcellation from the
Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas6. When measuring dynamic
functional connectivity (d-FC), we adopted a sliding-window method, with window
length = 100 TR (200 s) and step size = 3 TR (6s). We
calculated 4 graph theory attributes to reflect the topology of brain networks.
The graph theory attributes are all associated with nodes in network. The
statistical analysis procedure, including comparison and correlation, was
summarized in Figure 1.Results
Dynamic functional states
The healthy
control and patient data were clustered, yielding five cluster centroids as
dynamic functional states. The heatmap of these states and the percentage of
each group stayed in each state were shown in Figure
2. It can be seen that patients tend to spend less time on states featuring
with strong connectivity (State 2 and 4), while staying longer at less
connected states (State 5). Also, the most strongly connected state was rare to
both patients and healthy controls (State 3). The connection within cerebellum
was stronger in State 2 than State 5, but patients distribute mainly in the
latter state.
Graph attributes
For patients, the
clustering coefficient (CCFS), local efficiency (LE) and weighted degree (WD) were
lower than healthy controls in the identified areas and showed mostly negative correlation,
while BC had mixed results and positive correlation respectively. The same
statistical analysis was performed on dynamic graph attributes as well and
similar results were found. The stability of dynamic graph attributes was also
examined. LE and WD of patients were more stable compared with healthy
controls, whereas CCFS of patients was less stable and BC stability was mixed. For each of the significant regions, we
plotted graph attributes and area under the ROC curve (AUC ROC) as time slice
varies. The ROC curve where AUC reaches its maximum was also visualized.
Besides, the correlation of the static and dynamic features related to this
region and graph attributes was generated (Figure 3).Discussion and Conclusion
We applied both
s-FC and d-FC to evaluate functional changes in MSA patients. Graph theory
attributes were also calculated based on s-FC and d-FC. Results showed that MSA
patients differ from NCs in the s-FC and d-FC at the whole-brain level.
Moreover, from clinical perspective, we found that there were significant
correlations between indicators of s-FC and d-FC and clinical performance. Combined
with the above findings and the ROC analysis results, we suggest that the substantially
different FC features can serve as predictors to distinguish MSA from NC.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Beijing natural scientific foundation of
China (No.7182105) and the National natural scientific foundation of China
(Grant No. 81571648).References
1. Gilman
S, Wenning GK, Low PA,
et al. Second consensus
statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 2008;
71(9): 670.
2. Hutchison
RM, Womelsdorf T, Allen EA,
et al. Dynamic functional
connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations. NeuroImage. 2013;
80: 360-378.
3. Mueller
S, Wang D, Michael D, et al. Individual
Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain. Neuron. 2013;
77(3): 586-595.
4. Allen EA,
Damaraju E, Plis SM,
et al. Tracking Whole-Brain
Connectivity Dynamics in the Resting State. Cerebral Cortex. 2014;
24(3): 663-676.
5. Brodmann K. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in
ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Leipzig: Barth. 1909.
6. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, et al. Automated Anatomical Labeling of
Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI
Single-Subject Brain. NeuroImage. 2002;
15(1): 273-289.