Chantelle Y Lim1, Yang Li1, Xirui Hou1, and Hanzhang Lu1
1Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI (GRASP) is a fast
field echo radial acquisition with golden-angle rotation sequence used in
dynamic imaging due to its motion robustness and high temporal and spatial
resolution. In this study, we implemented GRASP for BOLD fMRI during visual
stimulation, which yielded distortion-free images in addition to reliable
activation maps and signal time-courses as compared to EPI-based fMRI. This
initial feasibility study suggests that GRASP could be extended towards other
parts of the brain to serve as an alternative when EPI suffers from signal
distortion.
Introduction
Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI (GRASP)
is an MRI technique that combines compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and
golden-angle radial sampling. GRASP has demonstrated motion robustness and high
temporal and spatial resolution in dynamic imaging, and has been one of the
most notable advances in the MR field in the past few years1. Echo
Planar Imaging (EPI), which is the conventional acquisition method of fMRI, may
suffer from motion artifacts and spatial distortion at air and brain tissue
interfaces2. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the initial
feasibility of using GRASP for BOLD fMRI. Methods
MRI data acquisition
3T MRI scans were acquired in two healthy
controls (1F/1M, 22 yrs). A visual fMRI paradigm was used, consisting of an
initial 40 second black screen as baseline, followed by 4x 20 second flashing
checkerboards and 40 second black screen. The fMRI scan using 2D fast-field-echo
radial acquisition with golden-angle rotation sequence employed the following
parameters (Figure 1a): FOV: 140x140x3mm3, TR/TE: 52.95/25ms, 5292
spokes, voxel size: 0.547mm,
total scan time: 280 seconds. An oblique slice intersecting the calcarine
fissure was used and the slice position is shown in Figure 2a. All acquired spokes were
divided into 251 dynamics, with 21 spokes in each dynamic and a TR of 1.1
seconds. For comparison, an EPI-based fMRI was also performed using identical
scan time and voxel size.
GRASP reconstruction
A flow chart of the GRASP reconstruction method
is shown in Figure 1b. Radial k-space data for each coil were re-sorted into 21
consecutive spokes/frame. The inverse non-uniform fast Fourier transform
(NUFFT) reconstructed image was used as an initial input with the goal of
minimizing the difference between the NUFFT image and k-space data (data
consistency). Additionally, a temporal total-variation operator (Figure 1c) was
used on the l1 norm to minimize differences between adjacent frames
(sparsity constraint)1. This temporal constraint was placed because
1) BOLD signal is relatively slow-changing; 2) only a small portion of the
brain is expected to be activated, thus the majority of the voxels in the image
should be temporally unchanged. To investigate the effect of varying parameters
in the GRASP reconstruction method, we used a range of weighting parameters,
ƛ=0-0.5 (Figure 2b) which controls the degree of tradeoff between data consistency and sparsity
constraint.
fMRI processing
Activation maps (thresholded at p=0.05 and a
cluster size of 20 voxels) associated with visual stimulation were obtained
from a general linear model analysis. An ROI of the primary visual cortex was
manually drawn and activated voxels inside the ROI were used for quantitative
BOLD time-course analysis.
Additional testing of the GRASP reconstruction method
We also implemented a cyclic total-variation
operator that constrains each time point in a cycle to its counterpart time
point across all previous cycles (Figure 4a). This constraint is based on the
notion that the same time points in different stimulus cycles should be minimally
different.
In addition, we tested the effect of spoke
number per image on the final results. We compared 17, 21 and 25 spokes/frame, corresponding
to temporal resolutions of 0.9, 1.1, and 1.3 seconds in the fMRI data. Results and Discussion
Figure 2b (top row) shows a representative
comparison of GRASP and EPI BOLD images of a single dynamic from one subject.
The GRASP images show a reduced amount of aliasing artifacts as the temporal
constraint factor, ƛ increases. Note the absence of distortion in GRASP images.
The activation maps (Figure 2b, bottom row) show an increase in activated voxels
in the visual cortex with ƛ (Table 1). On the other hand, spurious activations
in unrelated regions (e.g. cerebellum) are also seen as the temporal constraint
factor, ƛ became greater (Table 1). It appears that a ƛ of 0.05 yielded the
best tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity in GRASP fMRI. EPI fMRI
revealed a higher number of activated voxels but also showed sizable
false-positives in the cerebellum (Figure 2b and Table 1).
Figure 3 shows BOLD time-courses averaged across
four cycles (shown for both subjects). It can be seen that, as ƛ increases, the
hemodynamic curve becomes increasingly reliable with smaller inter-cycle error
bars. However, there is also a smoothing effect. A ƛ of 0.05 yields a curve
comparable to that of EPI BOLD (bottom of Figure 3).
Figure 4a shows the constraint scheme based on
minimal inter-cycle signal differences. Figure 4b shows the activation map and
the corresponding time-course. It can be seen that the time-course is noisy but
the inter-cycle error bars are artificially small (because of the
reconstruction constraints).
Finally, we tested the impact of the number of
spokes in each frame, by using different spoke number of 19, 21, and 25. Figure
4c shows activation maps and BOLD time-course as a function of spoke number,
which yielded similar results. Conclusion
This is the first report to use a novel
radial-acquisition technique for fMRI brain mapping that demonstrated reliable
activation maps and signal time-courses. Although this initial feasibility
study was performed in the visual cortex, GRASP could be extended to other parts of the brain where
EPI is known to be prone to signal distortion.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Feng, L., Grimm, R., Block,
K.T., Chandarana, H., Kim, S., Xu, J., Axel, L., Sodickson, D.K. &
Otazo, R. Golden‐angle radial sparse parallel MRI: Combination of
compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden‐angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic
volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med 2014; 72:707-717.
2. Glover, G.H. Overview of
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Neurosurgery Clinics of Nother
America 2011; 22:133-139.