Xi Chen1, Wenchuan Wu1, and Mark Chiew1
1University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Three-dimensional encoding methods like
multi-shot 3D-EPI are increasingly being explored as alternatives to multi-slice
2D acquisitions in functional MRI,
particularly in cases where high isotropic resolution is needed. However,
multi-shot 3D methods can suffer from artifacts and reduction of temporal
SNR (tSNR) due to inter-shot variability from motion or physiological
fluctuations. Here, we present a method for reconstruction of multi-shot 3D EPI
data, that is insensitive to smooth inter-shot phase inconsistencies due to physiologically-induced
B0 variations. This approach is based on annihilating filter Hankel structured
low-rank matrix completion, illustrating improved tSNR compared to conventional
multi-shot reconstruction.
Introduction
Three-dimensional
multi-shot data acquisition is an effective way to provide high isotropic spatial
resolution for fMRI1. However, physiological fluctuations like
respiratory motion during the acquisition of multi-shot segmented k-space can
induce temporally varying phase across different shots, which results in phase
cancellation and ghosting artifacts for each frame, leading
to a decrease of tSNR and image quality2,3. This can be particularly
challenging for data acquisition at ultra-high field, and in lower brain regions,
where respiratory-induced phase effects are strongest. In this study, we aim to
solve this problem by using annihilating filter-based Hankel structured
low-rank matrix completion4,5, in which no explicit knowledge about the physiologically induced
phase variation is necessary. Improved robustness and temporal stability are
demonstrated compared to conventional multi-shot reconstructions.Methods
We
formulate our 3D reconstruction problem based on the 2D annihilating
filter-based Hankel-structured low-rank matrix completion methods ALOHA4
and MUSSELS5. The existence
of an annihilation relation is shown in the equations:
$$M(x)_{i}\cdot{}\Phi(x)_{j}-M(x)_{j}\cdot{}\Phi(x)_{i}=0\text{ (1)}\\
M(k)_{i}\ast{}\Phi(k)_{j}-M(k)_{j}\ast{}\Phi(k)_{i}=0\text{ (2)}$$
Where $$$M_{i}=M\cdot{}\Phi_{i}$$$, $$$\Phi_{i}$$$ is the physiologically
induced phase for the ith shot, $$$M$$$ is the complex image without phase
corruption. From Eq. 2, the matrix generated from the concatenation
of k-space Hankel matrices associated with each shot should be low rank, assuming
the physiologically-induced phase is spatially smooth. This enables us to recover or interpolate the
missing k-space values of each shot using a low-rank matrix completion
algorithm.
As the
number of shots in a 3D EPI acquisition can be high, we bin multiple shots into a smaller number of respiratory states
according to respiratory information acquired from a respiratory bellows or
internal navigator. This exploits the fact that respiration induced phase
variation is nearly periodic, and reduces the dimensionality of the problem. Reconstruction
is performed using a constrained optimisation:
$$ argmin_{X}=||E\cdot{}X-Y||_{2}^{2}\\
\text{s.t. }rank(H\cdot{}X)=r\\
\text{and }H\cdot{}X\text{ is Hankel structured}$$
Where X is the multi-state k-space and Y is the
measured multi-shot k-space data. The encoding matrix E performs the composition of the following operators: M·F·S·F'·G', where G is the
linear operator that sorts the shots into different physiological-states, M selects
only acquired k-space locations for each shot, S represents multiplication by coil sensitivities, and F and F' are the forward and inverse
Fourier transform respectively. H·X constructs the Hankel
matrix from multi-state k-space data. This
is solved using an alternating projection method6, cycling through
the projections operations: (i) onto the data consistency set, (ii) onto the set of rank $$$r$$$ matrices, and (iii) onto the set of Hankel matrices. Once the multi-state k-space is
interpolated and inverse Fourier transformed, the image is reconstructed using
a sum-of-squares combination across states, which is insensitive to any
inter-shot phase variation. In the conventional reconstruction, the multi-shot
k-space is simply inverse Fourier transformed (Fig. 1). This procedure is applied independently to each time-point.
We
validated this approach using realistic simulations based on a set of 3T data
acquired with 2x2x1.5 mm3 resolution using a 64-channel receive coil.
We applied a periodically varying linear phase in the superior-inferior
direction, at low and high temporal variances. The max
off-resonance of the added phase variation assuming TE=30ms was 1.4Hz (low variation) and 5.7Hz (high variation) . Then we synthesized the data at the acquired k-space
locations for each shot with added complex noise. An inverse Fourier transform was performed first along Kx and
each 2D Ky-Kz slice was processed separately. Reconstructions were performed
with rank threshold 65 and kernel size 10, for 50 iterations. The sampling patterns and ground
truth data are shown in Fig. 2. Segmented sampling with a ∆=1 CAIPI shift was
used so every consecutive 24 shots had nearly uniform 3D k-space coverage. We
simulated a 96 shot, 32-time-point high-resolution 3D EPI acquisition with binning of shots
across 4 respiratory states, and evaluated the reconstruction performance by
examining tSNR compared to a conventional reconstruction.
Results
Fig. 3 shows representative
magnitude images for both low and high temporal phase variations reconstructed
with the conventional and the proposed method. In contrast to the phase
variations induced by multi-shot diffusion encoding, physiologically induced phase variability does
not result in obvious artifacts, although subtle ghosting can be observed.
Separate temporal mean and
standard deviation images are shown in Fig. 4, for low and high phase variation. We see that the mean images are very similar, while the standard deviation
images show marked reduction for the proposed method. In Fig. 5, tSNR is shown
as the ratio of the temporal mean and standard deviation images, highlighting
improved tSNR in the proposed method, due to reduced sensitivity to inter-shot
phase errors. The improvement is particularly high in inferior regions that
would be more
sensitive to respiratory-induced phase, like the brain-stem and cerebellum.
The mean tSNR improvement between proposed and conventional reconstruction across
the whole brain is 43.2% for
the low phase variation case, 51.6%
for the high case. Conclusion
The
proposed method uses recently developed annihilating filter low-rank
interpolation methods to improve the tSNR of multi-shot 3D EPI data. As
multi-shot 3D acquisitions are increasingly being used, particularly for
ultra-high resolution fMRI at ultra-high field strengths, reducing
susceptibility to inter-shot physiological variations will be a key step
towards robust, high fidelity 3D multi-shot fMRI.
Acknowledgements
The
Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging is supported by core funding from
the Wellcome Trust (203139/Z/16/Z). MC and WW are supported by the Royal
Academy of Engineering (RF201617\16\23, RF201819\18\92).References
1. Poser, B A, P J Koopmans, T Witzel, L L Wald, and M Barth. “Three
Dimensional Echo-Planar Imaging at 7 Tesla.” NeuroImage 51, no. 1, 2010:
261–66.
2. Tijssen, Rob H N, Thomas W Okell, and Karla L Miller. “Real-Time
Cardiac Synchronization with Fixed Volume Frame Rate for Reducing Physiological
Instabilities in 3D FMRI.” NeuroImage 57, no. 4, 2011: 1364–75.
3. Zwaag, W. van der, J. P. Marques, T. Kober, G. Glover, R. Gruetter,
and G. Krueger. “Temporal SNR Characteristics in Segmented 3D-EPI at 7T.” Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 67, no. 2, 2012: 344–52.
4. Lee, Juyoung, Kyong Hwan Jin, and Jong Chul Ye. “Reference-Free
Single-Pass EPI Nyquist Ghost Correction Using Annihilating Filter-Based Low
Rank Hankel Matrix (ALOHA).” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 76, no. 6,
2016: 1775–89.
5. Mani, Merry, Mathews Jacob, Douglas Kelley, and Vincent Magnotta.
“Multi-Shot Sensitivity-Encoded Diffusion Data Recovery Using Structured
Low-Rank Matrix Completion (MUSSELS).” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 78, no. 2,
2017: 494–507.
6. Shin, Peter J, Peder E Z Larson, Michael A Ohliger, Michael Elad,
John M Pauly, Daniel B Vigneron, and Michael Lustig. “Calibrationless Parallel
Imaging Reconstruction Based on Structured Low-Rank Matrix Completion.”
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 72, no. 4, 2014: 959–70.