Manish Awasthi1, Bansmita Kar1, Neha Vats1, Virendra Kumar Yadav1, Dinil Sasi1, Mamta Gupta2, Rakesh Kumar Gupta2, and Anup Singh1,3
1Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, New Delhi, India, 2Department of Radiology, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, India, 3Biomedical Engineering, All India Institute of Medical Science, Delhi, New Delhi, India
Synopsis
Presence of large blood vessels within tumor region
can mislead interpretation on quantitative T1-perfusion MRI, particularly using
automatic classification approaches. Purpose
of this study was to develop a methodology for automatic blood vessel removal from quantitative
T1-perfusion maps, compare it with previously reported methodology and finally
evaluating impact of blood-vessel removal on tumor grading. In the proposed
approach, signal intensity time curves characteristics, particularly contrast
wash-out rate and peak value provided accurate automatic removal of blood-vessel
from tumor region. Significant differences between T1-perfusion maps
with and without blood-vessel removal were observed and tumor grading were also
influenced.
INTRODUCTION
Imaging based Grading of brain tumors is being
done using radiological features of convention MR images and quantitative maps
such as CBV (Cerebral Blood Volume), CBF1,2 (Cerebral Blood Flow), Ktrans,
ADC, etc. Major blood vessels such as carotid arteries, occipital sinus and
many others may appear around the tumor and if they are included with segmented
tumor region, it gives high values of hemodynamic parameters to cause
misclassification or grading of tumor. So removal of major blood vessels is
essential for accurate measurement of parameters and grading of tumor. Manual
removal of blood vessels from segmented tumors is time taking and prone to
errors. There are methods in the literature which have attempted to remove
blood vessels from tumors2,3. However, sometime these
methods might fails to remove blood vessel or remove tumor part showing similar
value to blood vessel. Method based on DSC MRI3 is also not
applicable in T1-perfusion (DCE) MRI as Area Under Curve (AUC) of blood vessel
and contrast enhancing tumor might exhibit similar value. The current study have
attempted to develop a new methodology based on some new surrogate markers
derived from concentration curves of DCE-MRI data.METODS
Data Acquisition: This is a retrospective study, which included MRI
data from 40 brain tumor patients (20 low grade and 20 high grade classified
using WHO 2016 methodology). This study was approved by Institutional Review
Board of hospital and informed consent was obtained before MRI scanning. All
MRI experiments were performed on a 3 T whole-body MRI system (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, The
Netherlands) using a 15-channel receive-only coil. The MRI protocol for this
study included structural (T1, T2, PD weighted), T1-Perfusion (DCE), FLAIR
images.
Data processing: The registration of images was done using SPM12
software by taking T1-W images as a reference. Registered images were desculped
by SPM software and hence background noise was removed automatically. DCE-MRI
data was analysed using in-house developed routines in MATLAB. Pixelwise DCE MRI data was analyzed to convert signal intensity time
curves to concentration time curves C(t). Pre-contrast T1 required for this
process was obtained using T1, T2 and PD-w TSE images as described previously4. C(t) curves were fitted to piecewise linear model5 , GTKM model. First
pass analysis was also performed to compute relative CBV and CBF maps. Local
AIF was extracted automatically and used for GTKM and first pass analysis. Piecewise
linear (PL) model parameters, particularly Slope2 (wash-out rate) and Peak value
were used in the proposed method for automatic blood vessel removal. Proposed
method is described as follows
Step-1). Slope2 and Peak value maps
were generated for each slice
Step-2). Manually 4 ROIs having
almost uniform shape and size were drawn over blood vessel voxels. Mean and
Standard Deviation(SD) for slope2 and Peak values were calculated. Similarly,
Mean and SD of these parameters in tumor tissues without blood-vessel were
computed.
Step-3). A threshold of Slope2
(Mean±SD) and Peak value (Mean±SD) between tumor and blood vessel voxels were
determined.
Step-4). An algorithm based upon
these threshold was developed to remove blood vessels from tumor region
automatically.
ROIs were drawn by MTech student
and validated by experienced radiologist with more than 25 years of experience in
MR imaging.RESULTS
Box Plots in Fig.1 of different features for
differentiating between tumor voxel (TV) and normal blood vessel voxel (NV)
show that Slope2 and PeakValue are the best feature having no or very less
overlapping values. Three segment piecewise linear fitting for a NV and TV are
shown in Fig.2(b) & 2(c) of Grade-IV patient with goodness of fit (R2)
value 0.88 and 0.98 respectively. It shows a clear distinction between TV and
NV. Slope2 show a positive value and peak value is lower in comparison to NV
which has negative Slope2 value and higher peak value. Tumor tissue overlaid on
T1-W image, as shown in Fig.3(a), without blood vessels after applying proposed
method. Comparision of hemodynamic parameters4 (in Table.1) were done
before and after vessel removal of different grades of brain tumor. Hemodynamic
parameters showed a significant difference between values before and after
removal of blood vessels. Average values of these parametrs for tumors of
different grades also changed. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSIONS
In the current study, it was
observed that proposed method which is based on surrogate markers of DCE
perfusion MRI worked well in removal of blood vessels from tumor region. Proposed
approach weored well in both low and high grade tumors. Box plots of features
used in3 show that these features can’t
be utilized in DCE data for vessel removal. A comparative study has been done
to calculate hemodynamic parameters in different grades of brain tumors. This
shows that calculating hemodynamic parameters without vessel removal, can
misclassify tumors. In Grade-II CBV_norm_corr (90th_perct) value
before vessel removal was 5.52 ± 2.54(which classifies it into Grade-III) and
after applying vessel removal value was 2.69 ± 1.58 and optimized cutoff for between
Grade-II and Grade-II is 3.27 ± 1.21. Similar pattern was observed for other
grades also.Acknowledgements
This work was supported
by Indian Institute of Technology Delhi and Fortis Memorial Research Institute
Gurugram. I sincerely thanks to all my lab mates Ayan Debnath,RafeekT and Suhail Parvez. References
1.
Bailey P, Cushing H. A classification of the tumors of the glioma group on a
histogenetic basis with a correlated study of prognosis. Philadelphia, Pa:
Lippincott, 192.
2.
Sengupta A, Ramaniharan A, Gupta RK, Agarwal S, Singh A. Glioma grading using a
machine learning framework based on optimized features obtained from T1
perfusion MRI and volumes of tumor components.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar 20. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26704.
3. Kyrre E. Emblem, Paulina Due-Tonnessen, John K.
Hald, and Atle Bjornerud. Automatic Vessel Removal in Gliomas from Dynamic
Susceptibility Contrast Imaging Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 61:1210–1217
(2009).
4.
Singh A, Haris M, Rathore DKS, Purwar A, Sarma MK, Bayu G, Husain N, Rathore
RKS, Gupta RK. Quantification of physiological and hemodynamic indices using T1
dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in intracranial mass lesions. J Magn Reson
Imaging 2007; 26:871-880.
5.Singh
A, Rathore RKS, Gupta RK, Haris M, Rathore DS, Verma SK, Purwar A, Bayu G,
Sarma MK, Singh JK. Fitting of the Piecewise Linear Function to Signal
Intensity Time Curve and its Application in improving the Analysis of
Concentration Time Curve of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI Data. Proc. Intl.
Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. Berlin, Germany (2007).