Jun Ma1, Xinqiang Yan2, Bernhard Gruber3, Jonathan Martin1, Zhipeng Cao2, Jason Stockmann3, Kawin Setsompop3, and William Grissom1
1Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
Synopsis
To fully utilize the potential of a new cortical
imaging-optimized 7T scanner with Gmax= 200 mT/m & Smax=700 T/m/s gradients,
128 Rx channels, 16 Tx channels, and an AC/DC B0 shim array, we describe a
tailored parallel transmit inner-volume-suppression (IVS) pulse design, which
can enable highly accelerated functional and diffusion imaging by reducing
g-factor and suppressing physiological noise from ventricle CSF. 3D IVS pulses
were designed using simulated B1+ maps for the scanner’s 24-element coil.
Simulation results demonstrated uniform inner volume suppression for 3D and 2D
imaging. A 2D in-vivo IVS pulse design experiment demonstrated
IVS’s ability to reduce g-factor.
Introduction
MR
Corticography (MRCoG) is a developing imaging technique that will use inner
volume suppression (IVS) to enable highly accelerated functional and diffusion
imaging of the cortex, by reducing g-factor and suppressing physiological noise
from ventricle CSF. A new 7T scanner is being developed for MRCoG with Gmax=
200 mT/m & Smax=700T/m/s gradient
performance, 128 Rx channels, 16 Tx channels, and an AC/DC B0
shim array 1. Here we describe a tailored IVS parallel transmit pulse design for
the scanner, which could be applied before each excitation and readout. Methods
RF
pulses were designed for the 24-channel loop Tx array (Fig 1) that will be
built for the system and compressed to 16 channels using acpTx 2, using B1+
maps that were simulated in a human head model using Ansys HFSS (Canonsburg,
PA, USA). RF pulses were solved using a magnitude least-squares design that
alternated between RF and target phase updates 3,4. Figure 2 shows the target
pattern for pulse design which was an ellipse centered on the ventricles with AP/HF/LR
semi axes of 4.8/3.2/3.2 cm. All voxels in the cerebrum were considered in the
design, except for a transition band around the ellipse. Pulses were designed
both to excite the entire ellipse which would be applied before 3D acquisition
(“Joint”), and to excite only one slice at a time within the ellipse, while
treating voxels within the ellipse but in other slices as “don’t care” regions
(“Slice-by-Slice”), which
could provide improved suppression for 2D acquisitions. Both designs
targeted zero excitation in voxels in the cerebrum but outside the ellipse. We
also adapted a highly parallelizable k-space-based parallel transmit pulse
design that has low memory and computational requirements 5. A 7 ms SPINS trajectory 6 with 0.67 cm max resolution was designed for the
pulse subject to the scanner’s gradient amplitude and slew rate constraints
(Fig 3). To demonstrate the value of the scanner’s gradient performance, we
also designed 7 ms pulses with conventional Gmax= 40 mT/m & Smax=200 T/m/s gradient limits,
which reached the same spatial resolution but required higher excitation
k-space undersampling. To demonstrate the potential value of the AC/DC array, pulses
were also designed using an ideal B0 shim pattern in which
the target suppressed region was on-resonance and everywhere else was 500 Hz
off-resonance.
To demonstrate how IVS enables highly
accelerated imaging with low g-factor, we designed a patient-tailored 8-Tx-channel 2D
IVS pulse for a healthy subject, on a Philips 7T Achieva scanner (Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, Ohio,
USA).
The target pattern was an ellipse
covering the ventricles in a mid-brain transverse slice, with 4.9/2.8 cm
semi-axes in the AP/LR dimensions. The excitation trajectory was a 9.3 ms 2D
spiral with 2x undersampling and 1 cm max resolution.
The RF pulse was solved using the iterative
magnitude least-squares design and the B1+ maps
measured in the human subject. The target pattern matrix had resolution 3.5 mm. The
designed excitation pulse was played immediately before a gradient spoiler and a
non-selective excitation pulse, followed by a 3D gradient-recalled echo
sequence. 32-channel receive sensitivity maps were calculated with and without
the IVS pulse, and those 120-by-96 receive sensitivity maps were used to
calculate g-factor maps for R=2x, 4x, 6x, and 8x uniform undersampling in the
LR dimension. Results
Figure 4 shows that the joint design achieved 11.87% NRMSE, compared to 26.97% NRMSE
with conventional gradient specifications. Most of the errors appeared at the
edges of the transition band, with other errors lower than 5% of the target
flip angle. The
k-space-based design gave similar performance with the spatial domain method,
except for the edges of the transition band. The slice by slice design reduced the NRMSE to 4.75%. The ideal B0
shift further reduced the NRMSE to 4.40% and 2.31% for the joint design and
slice by slice design, respectively. Figure
5a shows the in-vivo sum-of-squares images with and without IVS. Figure 5b lists
the simulated 1/g maps and SNR-gain maps with different acceleration factors. IVS
improved SNR in locations where the inner-volume would alias, to the left and
right of the region. Figure 5c lists the mean and max g-factors for each acceleration factor. Conclusion
We have proposed a new tailored
parallel transmit pulse design for inner volume suppression in MRCoG, utilizing
the MRCoG scanner’s high performance gradients, 24-element Tx array, and AC/DC
B0 shim coils. Simulation results demonstrated uniform inner volume suppression
while maintaining the outer volume intact, which can in turn decrease g-factor
in highly accelerated imaging.
Discussion
In future work, we will numerically optimize
the excitation trajectory 7, apply acpTx to compress the array to the
scanner’s 16 channels 2, jointly optimize realistic AC/DC shim coil patterns
with the RF pulse, and verify g-factor improvements.Acknowledgements
This work
was supported by NIH grants U01 EB 025162 and R01 EB 016695.References
1.
Stockmann, Jason P., et al. "A 32‐channel combined RF and
B0 shim array for 3T brain imaging." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 75.1 (2016): 441-451.
2. Cao,
Zhipeng, Xinqiang Yan, and William A. Grissom. "Array‐compressed parallel transmit pulse design." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 76.4 (2016): 1158-1169.
3. Grissom,
William, et al. "Spatial domain method for the design of RF pulses in
multicoil parallel excitation." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 56.3 (2006): 620-629.
4. Setsompop,
Kawin., et al. "Magnitude least squares optimization for parallel radio
frequency excitation design demonstrated at 7 Tesla with eight
channels." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 59.4 (2008):
908-915.
5. Grissom, William. k-Space Domain Parallel
Transmit Pulse Design. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Paris,
France, 2018. Abstract 3396.
6. Malik,
Shaihan J., et al. "Tailored excitation in 3D with spiral nonselective
(SPINS) RF pulses." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 67.5 (2012):
1303-1315.
7. Davids,
Mathias, et al. "Fast three‐dimensional inner volume
excitations using parallel transmission and optimized k‐space trajectories." Magnetic resonance in medicine 76.4
(2016): 1170-1182.